pat23 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2005 (edited) Which of this two antivirus programs are better? NORTON or KASPERSKY? My copy of Norton is going to expire in a month, and i am just getting something esle. But i want to know which is better?Norton is well known the antivirus world, and are okay.Kaspersky has been recommeded by a few freinds and my prevouis webhost. So which one do you all think is better? Edited October 24, 2005 by microscopic^earthling (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abhiram 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2005 Kaspersky as an anti-virus is excellent. It's detection methods are much superior to Norton. Norton's database uses an exact copy of the viruses to cross check against with the files on your computer whereas kaspersky uses a method which looks for characteristic parts in the code which can be used to identify a virus. But Kaspersky's real-time protection is very memory-hogging. I've tried it and it eats away your RAM like crazy. Norton is pretty good for everyday use, but on my comp with 256 MB RAM, I had to chuck it in favour of PC-Cillin which though is not as good as Norton, it uses less memory and it gets the job done. Why don't you try out one of the free anti-viruses available like AVG or something? Try googling and see if you can find any. I've never tried any of them, but if they do their job well, you can save some money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pat23 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2005 Thanks for the info, but i think i am going to go with KASPERSKY, i will see how it does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grafitti 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2005 Good Choice!!! Kaspersky is worlds better than Norton, though I say that as an out-and-out enemy of Norton products. Forget about actually USING your computer if you're running their stuff. That said, Kaspersky is quite the hog as well. I tried them both and came away dissatisfied. Than after trying eztrust, mcafee, panda, and others, I found my latest baby... NOD32. Anti-virus program with (so far, in my experience) the lowest resource usage, even with full real-time scanning enabled, updates at least once a day for the latest viruses, and has won awards for best detection of wild viruses. Can't get better than that. ...though they could, with a firewall included. That's the only downside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
derouge 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2005 I use AVG now .. however, I used to use Norton and it never really impressed me. "Kapersky" sounds interesting, though. Maybe I'll look into that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pat23 0 Report post Posted October 17, 2005 I got Kapersky today and so far i beleive it is better than Norton, but it is a memory hog. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WeaponX 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2005 I personally use AVG also. I have used this free edition of AVG for years now and haven't ran into any problems that it can't handle.If you want a paid antivirus program NOD32, mentioned by Grafitti, should be pretty good also. I seen users saying (here at Xisto I think even ) that it's a great antivirus. I guess you can give their trial download a test drive before you buy it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted October 21, 2005 I think that Norton Antivirus is the Most depending anti virus all over the world i use it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nctspawn 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Personally, I have used Kaspesky for years and I feel that it is realiable and the virus detection was really fantastics and i even got hook by this antivirus & i am even using it till this days. Last time I was using Norton Antivirus but i feel that Kaspersky is better in sense of virus detection and it always update regularly in a single day itself. So, I would recommend Kaspersky Antivirus Personal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
twitch 0 Report post Posted November 3, 2005 According to the results of AV, Kaspesky is by far the best anti-virus solution. However, don't load all your eggs in one basket. I use CA eTrust Antivirus, and nothing gets on the machine. However, this does not mean it can't. I suggest you get two or three antiviruses (if you can), that way you keep your system going. I know antiviruses can conflict, but I have only seen that happen with Norton rubbish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted December 5, 2005 i would go for kaspersky which has quality virus scan, but is't slow on full system scan. Narton eats to much RAM and it's not realy reliable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pina 0 Report post Posted January 19, 2006 Kaspersky seems to be the better choice. Norton is a lot of heavy to the pcs and really slow down your machine. Kaspersky is even better and I thing is a great solution to the present and future.At the moment I don't use a anti-virus and believe I don't have any problem. I only use ad-aware SE to spyware and the firewall of windows. All free and without any problems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Killer008r 0 Report post Posted January 19, 2006 I use the combination of Spybot S&D, AVG, and HijackThis. They work good for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
romulo1405241517 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2006 these antiviruses sucks ! they used a lot mo memory ! and they don't clean all the viruses ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Find3r 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2006 Kaspersky all the way!!i use kaspersky for over one year now.never fails. Go for Kasperskyyy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites