Tyssen

What's a cutter (apart from a type of boat)?

What you have to do is link back to the same page with either a post or a session variable now included. So your code for the website would stay the same except you would have an if statement checking to see if _SESSION[...]  or _POST[...] existed. If it did then would now just run the function you wanted to run. So all you have to do is make the href="yourpage.php?login=yes"

Eh? Why would you have to do that? If the function is based on a session or post variable, you might have to, but if it's not you wouldn't. For instance,

<?php  function display($x){echo ($x - 10);  }?>

No need for any session variables in there.

This example from the MySQL site:

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE column1 = (SELECT column1 FROM t2);

Wouldn't it be something like this?

<a href="<? = nameOfYourFunction(variablePassedToTheFunction) ?>">Display items</a>

This is the error I get:

Warning: main(view.php?id=1) [function.main]: failed to open stream: Invalid argument in C:\server\xampp\htdocs\test\index.php on line 1

 

What's on line 1 of index.php?

IE5/Mac is trouble to work with and there is no good reason to still be supporting it especially as Microsoft themselves now recommend Mac users to ditch it in favour of Safari.
That's probably not going to help in your situation, so I'd suggesting posting your question at CSS Creator as there's people over there who use Macs who know what they're talking about when it comes to CSS.

It can be HTML too but you have to be careful what attributes you use and stuff because Firefox sometimes doesn't recognize them or just doesn't use them.

 

Unless you're talking about Microsoft proprietry code (in which case, all browsers, not just Firefox won't display those attributes correctly), Firefox recognises and uses exactly the 'attributes' as IE.

If we're talking about HTML as laid down in the W3C specifications, then Firefox follows the rendering of those elements closer to the letter than IE does.

i do not think the world evolves around me

 

The world may not revolve around you, but it certainly does evolve around you, just as it does around everyone else.

I don't buy that stuff about the sandbox. I just got 4mx.biz indexed in less than a month.

I did too for a site with a very uncompetitive search term. But if you want your site to show up in search results for competitive terms, expect to be affected by the sandbox and/or ageing delay.

hey when did you view the site?, i was changing some code on it last night,so maybe thats when you got those errors,cuz i am i am not seeing it now.

Look at the time of my post - that's when I looked at your site. I checked it in FF 1.5, IE6 and Opera 8.5. FF & Opera both had a blank scrollbar (meaning the scrollbar space was there but not the bit you'd use to drag left & right).

..it is not 100% complete

When you say it's not 100% complete, does that include the huge white space at the top and your navigation links? I hope so. Your links are unreadable in their normal state and only barely readable on rollover.
Also, you get a horizontal scrollbar in Firefox & Opera at 1024 x 780 even though the width of your content area must be less than 700px wide.

This site should only be viewed with Internet Explorer with Screen Resolution of 800 x 600 or Higher.

Any site that dictates which browser I should be using automatically gets 0/10 in my book (even if it does display OK in a non-IE browser).

I agree with michaelper22. I've tried this version of Netscape browser and find it rather bulky as well.

I've always found NS to be bulky - the download files are always huge. I think it's better for you to have the option to include stuff like you can with Firefox than to have a bunch of stuff you may not want included as default.

Yes, it does work in Opera too

Which version? Doesn't work in 8.5.

What additional feature does NS8 have?

About this Tyssen, I am a big fan of it, I hate that IE doesnt know the hover pseudo element but in an anchor. This is the way those list and sublist menus work in the good browsers right?

And is it normal that the installers are 80 MB? The installers for IE 501 and 55...

 

Menu items are links. I said I'm not a fan of it on things that aren't links, e.g., you've got it on your heading. Most people know that links change colour when you roll over them, so they come to your header and it changes colour and think it must be a link too, but it doesn't.

As for the installers, are you looking at Windows or Mac installers cos I'm sure the Windows ones weren't that big.

As for the Mac-only hack, does your site work if you take them out?

What's a prep?

I'll take a look with those older browsers... do you know what could be happening? As far as im concerned I did everything just right, using that IE only css hack...

IE5 browsers implement a different box model from IE6 in standards mode. You also need to apply text-align: center to the containing element to get the site to centre (you have to set it back to left on a descendant element).

Your Inicio menu moves vertically when you hover over it. The word 'Inicio' moves too when you hover over it (looks like increased letter spacing). I'm generally not a fan of elements changing colour on rollover if they're not links (except for form elements).
As for the browsers:
http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit
and how to set them up right:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/multiIE.html

Have you tried it without any styles? If it works, you know it's something wrong with your stylesheet.By the way, site shows up in IE5.01 & IE5.5 Windows but it's got some serious problems in both. And in Firefox you've got problems with content moving around when you hover over it.

I didnt know you could set % or pixels when positioning a background

You can also mix them up - you can have pixels for one value and % for another (although I don't think it works as well if you're using words and values together, e.g. center 50%).

And do you know if a style sheet with filters on it is a valid W3C style sheet?

No, they're not. Same goes for Mozilla properties that are preceded by -moz-.

The only javascript at the business end of the stick will be DHTML navigation.  But as for my site, everyone who'll be visiting that uses firefox with java enabled, so it's all good.

How do you know everyone will be using Firefox with js enabled? There's no way you can possibly know that unless you hand out invitations to your site and password protect it to prevent people who aren't invited using it.
As for using js for navigation, if you decide to go down that route, then you need fallback measures in place for those people who do have js turned off or they won't be able to access areas of your site.
If this is just a personal site, then it probably doesn't matter so much, but if you're intending it to be a business site, you're effectively losing customers by not covering all the bases.

Any style with 'filter' in it is MS only.

Edit your ScrollBar colors

Keep in mind that this is MS proprietry (read non-standard) code and doesn't work in other browsers.