Jump to content
xisto Community

Tyssen

Members
  • Content Count

    1,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tyssen


  1. P.S. Amezis your "Keyword stuffing, long title tag etc" I think is slightly wrong, please check Narutofan.combefore you flame me. View its sorce, because it is rank 1 in all Naruto Related keywords, and he Has about 70 - 80 key words at least.

    No, Amezis is right - keyword stuffing is not something that is recommended. Go to any online automatic meta tag generators and they won't let you enter that many. Penalties for keyword stuffing may not be as severe as they once were because nearly all SEs except Yahoo pay very little regard to meta tags anymore. Keeping that in mind, even if it doesn't penalise you, you're pretty much wasting your time putting all those words in due to the lack of importance attached to them.
    As for why the site ranks well for say 'naruto' - it could be that there is very little competition for the keywords featured on that site.

  2. For HTML 4 doctypes, it's actually invalid to have the trailing /.As far as rushing towards XHTML, some would argue that using an HTML 4.0 strict doctype is probably better than using one with XHTML 1.0 and serving your pages as content type text/html rather than the intended application/xhtml+xml.


  3. May I recommend using CSS, it will make your website a whole lot better, also make a nicer navigation, go to https://www.milonic.com/index.php and get a free navigation bar.

    You recommend using CSS (good) first and then recommend using a javascript menu like Milonic (bad). :lol:
    Search engines spiders don't like those complex javascript-generated menus because the links aren't actually there in the source of the page for them to be able to follow.
    So yes, use CSS, but if you're going to use it, use it properly and build your dropdowns with CSS as well.

  4. FireFox, not IE.Please Make Sure You Read The Post Properly Before Responding!
    FireFox version is currently 1.5

    Don't construe your lack of understanding for me not reading properly. :lol:
    What I meant is that all browsers since versions 4 of IE & Netscape (so, in other words, years ago) have been able to understand shorthand CSS. Your claim that it 'sometimes' works is wrong - I use it all the time and my sites check out fine in Firefox, IE5-7 (including IE5/Mac*), Mozilla, Netscape, Opera, Safari, Konqueror and Camino.
    If you find it not working for you 100% of the time, you're doing something wrong.
    Oh and smartbei, using inline styles is as bad as using font tags - CSS is intended to separate presentation from content, and by using inline style, you're just doing the opposite.

    * The only browser I've come across that requires the long hand version of CSS is IE5/Mac when specifying left and right margins.

  5. I can't do the online tutorials anymore. They're just too succint, they gloss over things that I have to go to a different tutorial to find out, and I just don't think that they are teaching me at the level that I want to be taught.

    Same could be said of books too - they might include examples that you find aren't relevant to your situation. Each person is different but I find the easiest way to learn is to have a certain project in mind and then go out to find out how to do it. I've learnt just about everything know about web related stuff online and have only ever bought one book which was about javascript (and which I probably know the least about).

  6. You need to float #content left and give it an appropriate width. Then, remove the absolute positioning from #linkList and give it a margin-left wider than the width of #content.Ideally both those two columns should go inside their own wrapper div which should have overflow:hidden applied to it so that Firefox expands to contain the floats (IE does this incorrectly by default).


  7. Thanks rvalkass. It works except that you have to press enter after hitting CTRL + Access Key but it's okay. Thanks again. :huh:

     

    It's alt + access key actually and it's perfectly acceptable that someone should have to press two keys for site navigation, I mean, that's the way 99% of all program functions work when not using the mouse. About the only programs I can think of where pressing a single key produces a result is graphics programs when selecting different tools, so for most people, pressing a single key and suddenly being take to a different page would actually be unnatural and unexpected behaviour.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.