Tyssen

Google is the next Microsoft.

A more up-to-date version of the Suckerfish dropdown can be found here.

Try it with the background in place. If it looks OK, then there's no need to worry about selecting colours to be transparent. I've actually done a couple like that recently and I've found it's easier to do with the background in place. Then you just have to match up the position correctly which is easy to do if you're using CSS.

I asked this ages ago and don't think I ever got a reply (or maybe I forgot to check). But really, there's no need to make too big a deal out of it. Just make sure you've got enough credits regardless of what plan you're on.

I think he got it backwards: moral fibre's when the hot chick keeps going out with the ugly guy even when everyone else says she should leave well alone.

I know exactly how people in London must be feeling. I lived there for about 7 years and I used to travel regularly on the #30 bus. I was there on Sept. 11 and so had to deal personally with a similar fear to what people must be feeling now. Both my wife & I worked in the City and there were several scares in London in the days following 9/11 cos people thought it might've been just the start of a global campaign. We left to come back to Oz at the beginning of 2002 and were pretty glad to leave by that time cos London had definitely become a much tenser place in the period between September and February.

You'll have to include the full path so it will probably be something like '/public_html/yourdirectory/myframe.htm'.

You shouldn't use laptops for graphics and design unless you can connect them up to a desktop monitor cos laptop monitors distort colours/aspects.

Mate, you get today's award for most nonsensical rambling I've read. Odd choice to single out - Australia doesn't need birth control. In fact, we need the opposite of what is in place in places like China because Australia's population is ageing rapidly due to the fact that the older generations are living longer while the younger generations aren't producing as many children.

That's the thing though - take away the nice image from the 2nd one and it's a fairly bog standard sort of layout. It's the image in that one that really makes it look better but as you say you're gonna replace all the images, then it really will depend on what you replace it with. You might find that the 1st one would ultimately look better depending on what images you use. Not everything with Flash looks nice. Flash can look pretty cheesy itself if it's overdone or not done very well.

Can I just point out that the reason why Cascading Style Sheets are called that is cos the styles cascade down from one element to another.If you set a style on your <a> tag, all states of the tag will pick up that style. You only need to add additional rules for when you want something different to occur. So taking the above example, you would be better off doing: .inhoud a { color:#ffffff; text-decoration:none; font-size: 13px; }.inhoud a:visited { color: red; }.inhoud a:active { color:green; }.inhoud a:hover { color:black; text-decoration:underline; }Also, you've specified a font in your .titel and .inhoud classes, whereas if you do this: body { font-family: verdana; }it will flow down through every element in your document and you don't have to keep repeating it.

LOL, that's what I thought too.

It's not Frontpage's Flash-support which makes it flawed, it's the overbloated, messy code it produces that makes it flawed.

There's generally two ways to upload stuff to web servers: 1. You use your web browser and an upload manager or control panel page provided by your ISP/web host. Usually with this you'll click on a 'browse' button to locate the images on your hard drive and then click 'upload' or something like that. 2. You use an FTP program which, once you know how to use one, is a lot less hassle than trying to do it through your web browser. It essentially does the same thing but FTP programs are more powerful/flexible and you can drag and drop your files etc. There's loads of programs out there but some of the more common ones are SmartFTP, WS_Pro, CuteFTP, AceFTP. You'll need to go on to http://download.cnet.com/windows/ or something similar, find a program, download it, install it and then enter your ISP's server details to be able to connect. Once all that's done, uploading/downloading should be a lot easier.

You can use this site to create a favicon from any image.

If the site's xcitem.com, isn't there an 'm' missing from text in the large logo?

That's a technique called 'hidden text' and search engines can actually penalise you for that because it's considered spam. There shouldn't really be any instances whereby you need to have content on your site that's not viewable by users.

I hardly think he's gonna make the whole thing a single image - what's been posted is just a preview image.

Not very often you get a security flaw that affects *nix but not Windows.

This topic on CSS Forum has a good discussion about text HTML editors.

You should Google 'session variables'.

Your best first move would be to find out more about why the site's inaccessible. It could be that it's just down temporarily.

You want to unlearn that one - it's simply not true.

And if you use a CSS image replacement technique, you can still have the text in your HTML as well as using an image.

You can do it with ASP. Instead of sending the form to another page, you send the form to the same page to check the login. If it doesn't work, the page prints the error message and then the form to fill in again. If it does work, use response.redirect to go the relevant page.