Jump to content
xisto Community

snlildude87

Members
  • Content Count

    2,350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by snlildude87

  1. Oh. My. Cod. That is dark. (thought I use that before anyone else uses it ) And there's something wrong with Photobucket, too. An image will NOT load if you're attempting to open load a page and an image simultaneously. That means that I have to stop all other page from loading. As for the sig: Can't tell what's happening on the left. It looks like a pillow is resting on a flashlight which is on a box. That's how weird it looks The brushing is kinda simple. Maybe that's because you brushed too much. I don't know. Good use of dots. Gave it depth. Anyone up for a game of Dots? The text is weird. Lose the inward bevel. 7.5/10
  2. [1]Hey! That's the amount of time it took me to make it! That means that this sig was made for you. Your welcome. [2] Why would I put your middle name on the sig? Silly Brooks, Trix are not for Nguyen (it has a crappy taste). [3] Yeah, but I was trying to make it look like a sea of jellyfish. I'll try your program to see what I can come up with. [4] Yeah sure.
  3. [1] I know that, but one of my brushes came with it.... [2] Tricky Brooks [3] Yeah sure whatever don't mention it.
  4. Did you just quote yourself?! Maybe why my scanlines are dominating the sig is that the opacity is set to 100%....I'll try to apply some at 20% - 40% to see what happens.
  5. ...or maybe there's something wrong with the "Kween".
  6. [1]Dude, that has to be like 400 MBs. Why don't you save them all to a disk? [2] What Brooks said. It's monotone, and it's kinda hard to tell what's happening in the background. It looks like there's a tiger floating by the render's arms. [3] If you're gonna put text on your sig, make sure it's not too transparent. I always use 60% - 80% opacity for my text.
  7. Did the fractals come with the grid or was that the work of Brooks? There are several black spots that I don't like, but it's still good.8.9/10
  8. What do you think? It kinda looks like a sea of jellyfish. The font was originally in the bottom left, but that made it hard to read.
  9. Simple yet awesome.How did you make the grids like that? I tried something like that, but it came out weird -- grid dominated the sig. :D9.8/10
  10. I like the font. It may not be visible at first, but it's elegant.
  11. Half a frickin' hour?! I spend like 5 minutes on mine, and there are no thinking. I just do whatever looks good. :-/ Go with the flow, but if you flow too much, you might end up on a waterfall, and that's no good.
  12. Michael may be great in graphics, but sometimes he makes ridiculously ugly sigs. Makes me wonder what's in his head. By the way, his templates uses tables for positioning, and that's a big no-no. [2]It's jay kay. Two words. If you're gonna do it, do it right. [3]Gotta love freeware. Thanks for the link, I'll try it out.
  13. Whoa! Nice ones, dude.Are these from the brushes on deviantart? I love the green one because it's my favorite color.
  14. Thread closed. Go to serverph's link/thread instead.
  15. Oh, that is good. Nice touch on the fancy font, too.The background is a little simple, but it doesn't matter.9.9/10
  16. Is that because she's not very busty? *refers to your sig* Nah, I like abstract backgrounds, and the round stuff in the background sort of looks like wheels. :-/
  17. There...are no renders, and no Gift from Johnny/Brooks, but it's an awesome sig nonetheless. Is that all brushing?*adds to collection of rotating sigs*
  18. What did it tell you to do? I think it says to contact an administrator. We have to admins here: NilsC and OpaQue. PM one of them.It seems like you cannot do that, so I took the time to do that for you.Thread closed.
  19. Good job, Kubi!Should we give this one to Kubes, now? Or do you think more people will vote for Phyre?
  20. Umm, I can make a rating system, but I can only do it on my site. If I'm displaying a sig on my site, then it's possible, but it's not possible Invision Power Board.... I hoped that made sense....
  21. [1]You spend at least half and hour on a sig?! That's hardcore. [2]I have yet to see one like that [3]I think I was referring to Michael's scale...not yours, but thanks for the information. [4]That's what I kinda do.... [5]I'm not sure either....Michael is cucoo for cocoa puffs.
  22. The background is pretty awesome, but the colors are a little bit too bright for me. You should have made the chesty girl another color though.6.5/10
  23. Moderators will manually lower your warning level when we see that you have followed the rules, and help others for at least 30 days. And how can you say that you "accidentally" started a thread in the wrong forum? The rules are pinned. You should have read that. Even the description of the What Is...? forum is clearly stated: OpaQue even took the time to capitalize the important words: "Read pinned topic." I don't think that other members can see you warning level. Only moderators can see, but we do not judge members based on their warning level. If we see a member with a warning level higher than 0%, we check their history, and make the decision to adjust the warning.
  24. Problem solved -> thread closed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.