cloud28 0 Report post Posted September 25, 2005 Well, cs source has alot of potentials, but cs 1.6 is much better in gameplay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbeek04 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2005 Source just looks so much more realistic... while 1.6 is like a cartoon. I personally liked both but source just appeals to me more because of it's overall gameplay and look. The only problem is... source is starting to give me, as well as many others, skipping problems. My gameplay skips... or more like... stutters, locks up, "lags" if you want to call it... even though my ping is perfectly normal. It usually happens when I first load and when I fire my weapon. People claimed it to be fixed with the new patch... but mine still does it. I'm still looking into how to fix it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
João Vitor 0 Report post Posted October 29, 2005 CS 1,6 is good... but we have that to admit that this new engine and very good^^ Only I want the shield of the CTs in return! xD heheheheheheheh!Bye Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint-Jimmy 0 Report post Posted November 4, 2005 ugh, the shield made it all crappy, CS Source rules, it's really exploitable too, which is kinda funny, but when I play CS 1.6 (which is in my opinion the game for poor people who can't afford powerful PCs), I ask the players why they like this and they don't get Source, and all of them say laggy hitboxes or they have a crap PC... but i never notice the hitbox problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
acheron 0 Report post Posted November 18, 2005 I started playing CS around the 1.2 version. And I've played on and off until 1.6. Then when my friend started playing CSS, I kinda started too.Sure it was kind of dreadful going from those ugly models and such in CS, but once you get used to CSS you can't go back. It's more balanced, AWP isn't as good as it was for CS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted December 3, 2005 anyone seen purepwnage??? its really funny go http://www.purepwnage.com/ its about these hardcore gamers!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
initial 0 Report post Posted December 5, 2005 When CSS first came out, I wasn't too sure about it. I mean the graphics were just so much better, but if it didn't go well with the community then hardly anyone would play it, such as with EQ and EQ2. But over time I realized that it was in fact more realistic, and balanced better then the previous release. After getting use to it, I have stuck with CSS since. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wowclub 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2006 i perfer cs1.5.....dont play for cs, since 1.6 arrives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x2crazy4shadyx 0 Report post Posted January 26, 2006 LOl who ever has 1.6 just doesn't want too upgrade... if source was called 1.7 then no one would be playing 1.6.... just buy a better computer and start source you will be amazed by how much better it is... cal main =) source Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pUcKeR 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2006 LOl who ever has 1.6 just doesn't want too upgrade... if source was called 1.7 then no one would be playing 1.6.... just buy a better computer and start source you will be amazed by how much better it is... cal main =) sourcehahaha I agree... visual and gamplay comparison in Source BY FAR EXCEEDS 1.6I've played since 1.5 and at least source makes logical sense when you shoot objects... I mean in 1.6 you can shoot through walls... That's SOOOOOO REALISTIC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x2crazy4shadyx 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2006 hahaha I agree... visual and gamplay comparison in Source BY FAR EXCEEDS 1.6 I've played since 1.5 and at least source makes logical sense when you shoot objects... I mean in 1.6 you can shoot through walls... That's SOOOOOO REALISTIC 1064336590[/snapback] You got a great point. When i use too play cal for 1.6 i would always die or kill ppl threw like a 5 inch wall kinda sad. And when is the last time they upgraded 1.6? Source is just the way too go if you don't got cash just steal it from your friends lol. Its a great game UPGRADE ALREADY ****!!!! And if you do have source pm me for my server info so you can get pWN! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clear 0 Report post Posted February 15, 2006 i think this game rocks alot of people like different kinds of games tho Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted September 28, 2007 Today I played cs 1.6 then I played cs source. source is my pick. you actually feel like your bullets are hitting your enemy because he bleeds when he gets hit and doesn't bleed only when he dies like in 1.6. and the good graphics add a better feel to the game. also, the amazing physics engine makes grenades more fair.-lulz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted February 21, 2008 Hey, I play CS:S alot and I was just wondering what CAL stands for as I have noticed alot of the people here using itThanks,Oli Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jc804 0 Report post Posted March 7, 2008 (edited) I used to play 1.6 all the time and when source was released I was like.. I don't want to change. When I finally made the switch around two years after it's release, you know it took some getting used to. I occasionally went back to 1.6, but I noticed that each time I went back to 1.6 I realized how much better css was. Now I play source every time. It seems headshots are even more common in source than 1.6 and there are still some hitbox lagging behind the model issues to be resolved. I love the increased sound support and graphics. I am a pub awp hater, but thats easy to deal with.. plenty of no-awp/auto pubs out there to play on. Steam name: Destructor hope to see you around Edited March 7, 2008 by jc804 (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
