csp4.0 1 Report post Posted April 26, 2007 Nobody will ever know when the dimensions stop, there are infinite dimensions possible, we are just imagining a few. Trying to travel to and from universes will be virtually impossible, unless you can build some kind of space craft that can travel through the void. To make void travel possible the ship will have to have an atomic mass of 0 for it to survive entering into the void.Reference - Doctor Who BBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hitmanblood 0 Report post Posted May 18, 2007 Nobody will ever know when the dimensions stop, there are infinite dimensions possible, we are just imagining a few. Trying to travel to and from universes will be virtually impossible, unless you can build some kind of space craft that can travel through the void. To make void travel possible the ship will have to have an atomic mass of 0 for it to survive entering into the void.Reference - Doctor Who BBC I wouldn't really agree what if our society that is human specie it self is working out some way to imporve itself or even to increase itself or to develop on the natural basis and that so our minds are more developed and so on that our brains develop in such way that we might see or even experience new dimension in this way we would be able to work out something with these relations.You get what I am speaking or shell I say writing about Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
amit nigam 0 Report post Posted May 23, 2007 hi friends,i think that the theory is quite coool, interesting and researchable..that is what i feel because it makes a lot of sense... i think it is just one more, easier one though, way of telling the theory of relativity....since everything is relative you cannot say that this is big and this is small....and then when you start looking at things like proposed in the given theory it makes a lot of sense...seriously...if i were a Phd Physics student then i would have given it a shot... a serious shot...maybe what if we are sort of a molecule in another bigger world of bigger people...or maybe there is another world of bacterias or viruses or things like that which are smaller than even quarks which we are not able to see through today's microscopes....so if keeping this theory in mind we start wandering our mind in the direction of microscopes, that is the smallest, and telescopes, that is the farthest, then we have many opportunities....i may feel like not making sense right now but i am not able to express myself correctly right now...that is it....still lovely theory....i would like to see some more replies on this topic...ok bye...keep writing....signing off..Amit... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matak 2 Report post Posted May 30, 2007 I think this is the intro you were reffering in first posthttp://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Striker9099 0 Report post Posted July 6, 2007 Interesting theory. Although you lack some of the latest psychics information regarding the creation of the universe. First quarks are not considered smallest particles that create whole universe anymore. Quarks are made from Quantum theories and are small particles which make protons, or neutrons, which then make atoms, which form molecules which form matter in 4 known forms to man. Liquid, Solid, "Boiling", and Plasma state.Your theory is interesting beacouse of how you feel that universe acts, i mean how you see other dimensions of space and time. The latest theory of unification called Superstring Theory proves that there are no only 4 dimensions in which we live in but rather there are 11 dimensions (there is a posibility that there is even more, but i didn't get to that part yet). So you see we are living in 11dimensional universe, although we are only aware of 4 dimensions. 3 dimensions of space, and 1 dimension of time.Trying to visualize 10 dimensions of space is really hard, and maybe only few ppl in the whole world can do it, so most of the people have free mind when they want to visualize other dimensions. Also one more thing that this new theory says that it is quite possible that after Big Bang this wasn't the only universe created, and possibly there were many other universes created also. Just it is beyond our near minded perceptivnes to visualize those universes.There is a possibility that we are just "cought" in 3 dimensions by some ways of nature, and that we ourselves need to open our minds to wide variety of perceptions of other dimensions, which can sometimes result in great visions, you can have about your Beeing in this place called universe. One of those visions homer simpson had that day, and you liked it a lot. I saw that same thing and i liked it too. But you can say also that maybe there is more to it, other than going really small, then really big and then getting back to really small. Although i find that idea very attractive. Yeah I've heard about this theory before (in my physics class actually) and the teacher tried to explain in to us but we all got perplexed, the teacher himself actually did as well. I think understanding such concepts is beyond our mind abilities and only a few people (like Einstein for example) can actually comprehend and visualize such concept. Ok now these dimensions are all limited inside what we call "the universe" which is a huge being that consists of particles. But what about the "void" where no particles are there? So taking in to consideration the the idea of this topic, when you zoom out and keep on zooming out, eventually you'll have to be standing in the "void".Now, take a point in space... a point has no dimensions right? but take another point at a distance from the first one, you'll have a straight line of the 1st dimension. now take another point in the same plane of the first 2 points, we'll have a triangle of 2 dimensions. now take another point outside that plane and we'll get a tetrahedron of 3 dimensions... so basically WE ARE CREATING DIMENSIONS! Dimensions are relative, they don't really exist but we make them there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetraca 0 Report post Posted July 6, 2007 Um, but those theories are taken from weird movies that only think about getting viewers. Scientific TV program (like doctor who or stargate) are more reliable sources of theories. Take Doctor who for example, who says that everything is all happening at the same time even though time itself does not exist. every decision we make creates a different parallel universe, so if i were to accidentally type accidentally wrong then that would have created a universe. In between universes is the place called the void. People that program know that void means nothing, so in the void there is 100% vacuum, no particles, no color, no shades so thats why nobody knows what the void looks like. To people we might actually be living on their quark and them living on another specie's quark. We won't know until we can use FTL travel or build quantum network tunnels like the ones from Supreme commander or Stargate TV shows are never a good place to extract scientific information. For example, Star Trek bases itself on many scientific theories, but it itself comes into fallacies. Transporters cannot exist because of Heisenburg's Theory of Uncertainty. The "Warp bubble" that allows the Enterprise to travel past the speed of light would require more energy to maintain than the output we could get from contained antimatter-matter reactions that occur in the Warp nacelles, and this was probably the most plausible scientific theory from any TV show for interstellar travel that has been in part actually explained, next to the wormhole. Alternate dimensions/universes have never been proven to exist. Physics allows for them to exist but they have never been proven to exist, and we don't have a theory of Quantum Gravity yet so we don't really know if black holes could transport us to these dimensions spaghettified. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mermaid711 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2008 Introduction: I have always had a theory on what is outside the universe where we have never been and telescopes cannot see. I actually saw a variation of this in the beginning intro to a Simpsons episode where they zoomed out until you could see all of the galaxies and then kept zooming out until there were lots of galaxies and that turned into molecules which turned back into Homers forhead where at that point he says "woahhhh" in a stupid sort of way which makes me laugh. Hmmmm you saw this on the Simpsons. . . wow should I even bother reading this? My Theory: We don't know whats smaller than a quork (think i spelled that wrong) and we do not know whats larger than a galaxy. So my theory is that if we zoom out passed all of the galaxies the galaxies become the next smallest thing to quorks which as you continue to zoom out you see molecules and so on until it forms a shape which could be anything since everything is made of atoms (except light... and energy..). This works the same way vice versa where if you zoom in you start seeing things that resemble galaxies if you zoom in and eventually you start seeing universes and more detailed things such as other worlds. Ummm, yes we do. There is only one universe as far as man knows. (Hince the term UNIverse.) So can you explain to me something? Do I have little people floating around inside of me? Do I have planets, stars, and nebulas in my body? Didn't think so. . .  If you didn't understand this brief explanation of the universe don't feel stupid because this is one of the hardest things to explain and this is just my theory which could be completely wrong but since we don't know all we can read about is the theories.I like the disclaimer "If you don't understand this, don't feel stupid." . . . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ViableMarket 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2008 WOW I love this topic and discussion...everyone has put through some really good veiws.Quite a long time ago I did 1st and 2nd year uni studies in Computer science. One subject I studied was called basic maths A.I found it a very difficult subject and I failed and then quite the course. This maths subject was about a form of math the was used to discribe multi-dimensional space, and was called Linear Algebra using Matrices and Vectors.This form of math is nowadays most commonly used to calculate complex math for the reproduction of 3D images on 2D computer screens, like most good games and CAD/CAM/CAE software.The reason I found the subject so difficult was not because I had trouble understanding or visualising 3D, 4D spaces or concepts, but rather that I found it impossible to visualise or understand a level of dimensions up the nth dimension and beyound. And that is the type of calculation it is used for.The lecturer for the subject made this statement in one class "As a pure mathematician I can discribe any three dimensional object using Linear Algrebra". It blew my mind and I said to myself "woahhhh".Since then I have done other uni studies in science and really enjoyed chemistry and physics. In chemistry their are a number of very intimate bonds that exist between components of each of the molecules that make up the "compound"I think that Quantum physics and the string theory together may lead us to understand the delicate balance that exists between "Sub-Quark" (thats my term for it) particles, although I would not be suprised if this relationship is one based on pure energy rather than matter. And I think that is very exciting.I also agree that "Time" is a concept man uses to discribe the rate of change for all things. Everything changes, it helps to realise the rate of change for the object we happen to be studying.Many years ago while scientists where trying to prove their theory of the existance of the Quark, they can to realise an important fact of nature and the nature of the universe. At the time they tried to track the movement of the Quark and predict where and when it would be at a certain place so that they could "Capture" evidence of it's existance. What they discovered was that it was never where they predicted, and infact the harder the tried to find it the more difficult it was to "capture".I think this principle is now well documented. It has also been in at least one of the Stargate episodes :)I think that once we understand the energy component of matter then we will find a new direction and new technologies for it.Have any of you heard of "The Secret"? It has apparently been used by successful people for centuries, and an explaination is now available on DVD.Basiclly it says that if you truly want something for your future then you should put your dream/desires out to the universe. In reply the universe will put events into play in your life that will lead you to that result sometime in the future, even if you don't realise it is happening.I think our perception has a very big role in what we are able to understand. If we try to learn something new we need to take on a new perception of things. Any new discovery demands this.Success in most things requires 2 basic things of us, burning desire and persistance.I had an experience a few years ago that supported my belief that we exist here in a part of space that is multi dimensional.It is always easy to think of the multi dimensional space being out there somewhere, out in space. But if that principle exists out there, then it also exists here too.One night I woke from a restful sleep to hear the sound of shuffling feet, it was a warm night and I was sleeping on the sofa bed. When I sat up to try to find the source of the noise I saw three(3) opaque ghostly human type figures wondering through my house! They disappeared like wispy clouds on a breezy day.And yes, I may have been still dreaming, but thats what I saw.If we are to travel from one place in the universe to another place many light years away, then clearly we have to find a way to take time out of the equation. Folding space is not a new concept but maybe there is another way.And if humans are to travel in this way then clearly we need to take acceleration out of the equation also, at least the the duration of the journey in this way. No-one could survive that type of acceleration and deceleration.Maybe de-materialisation and re-intergration will be the key to traveling long distances like these, maybe not.But I think projects like the Human Genome project, Dark Matter project (underground test facility), Quantum Theory and String Theory will all play a major roll in unfolding the secrets we will need to enter the next leap in Human discovery.Love your work Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbafactory 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Â Â Â Edited February 22, 2009 by mbafactory (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbafactory 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Nice Discussion! I want to contribute as well; I would like to discuss "Reality", What is reality? Consider an island, people living on it, completely isolated from the rest of the world. They have been developing their culture in such a way that they think, the color of leaves of trees is black, and they take it to be black rather than green which is a reality for all of us. What happen when we come in contact of them or vice versa. We are into conflicts of each other, so does the reality change? Not at all! Leaves of trees remain of the color they are! All that changes is our frame of reality or rather Relativity. We are human beings, (*person*-Sapiens to be precise!) and in the past 2000 years we have evolved in a continuous manner, forming current form of our culture. We have advanced a lot when we compare to similar human civilizations which evolved on this earth during our known knowledge of time. Technologically, scientifically, culturally and in any other way we can think of- We have an observatory science which works as per the Newtonian frame of reference, and all that we see or observe is according to the perceptions we have developed during our evolution. With the rate of our growth as calculated above, we need around 2500 years to travel an light year with the highest speed we have. So till the time someone from the space comes to travel us back in the time, or we have a miraculous scientific break through technology invented, we will have a narrower stage of our vision which we have.One thing which is just evident, most of us have a similar view, that we are in nescent phase of existance of civilization, lets hope for better!So What we see as our reality, is a local and temporary phenomena. Everything keeps on changing as we evolve. Edited February 22, 2009 by mbafactory (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kittycatlover763 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 even though the simpsons are pretty much stupid the developers of the show actually taught you something there huh? in one of my years of college one of the teachers told us that everything was made of atoms. so as i could see your theory as relevant it is lacking in somewhat knowledge. here is the cycle of well the universe: Â earth(planet) milky way(galaxy) cluster of galaxies more clusters other stuff,(lol) Â everything got created by the thing scientists call the big bang whheee,big bang bada boom bang and everything was created! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
networker 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 I guess what your saying is it's all cyclical and circles backto itself so to speak.It makes sense since nature by itselfis cyclical.It's possible.though pretty general. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ackotheadvertiser 0 Report post Posted February 23, 2009 Ok, now listen to my theory. It's more like a few 'stupid' thoughts, but it does makes some sense.Everything is made by atoms, and it's endless. It's like you are zooming in and you'll see a lot of different planets in one molecule(few atoms=few planets). Then again, you zoom in and the people(subjects, anything) in the planet(atom) are also made by atoms. And those atoms are planets too. And everything is predicted, when we push a button of the keyboard, galaxies(or planets) are diing. But their time isn't like ours. One second of ours is like a million of their years. And while things are happening around us(in the space), somebody might just be moving their finger-very slowly for us. And it's endless, or it's just repeating the same thing over and over again. And our Solar System is actually an atom with electrons around it(the planets). That's another thought. And since no theory is proven, why we shouldn't believe in this one? It's sure a fun thing, to fresh us up a little. And now here are a few questions:-Who created the universe?-Who created the one who created the universe?-Is there really a life outside ours(money, noise, jobs-you get the picture)?-Or we should just stay 'cool'(without any knowledge) and see only what we can?-Something can come out of... nothing? -How?-Why we keep wondering, it sure won't be discovered while we are alive. And if there's paradise, hell, God, or something, we should discover that once we die-don't we? Or our souls will just be lost and time(whatever that is) will keep moving on and we'll just disappear-which is something I don't want to believe, but what's the point in staying 'immortal' if you have nothing to look forward for? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rpgsearcherz 5 Report post Posted February 23, 2009 These are all pretty interesting views, and some are more believable than others(obviously) but really we do not know what is and what is not true.I do not really have much of a view on the subject, being that there is no solid proof one way or the other.So for me, I just hope that at some point in time we end up finding out the truth.Any of you want to hold bets as to what view of yours is possibly correct?:DFor me, I guess the best I could do is relate everything to religion. There is a god(God) and he is the one that does everything, made everything, etc. But aside from that, I really do not know what else to say, nor what to think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Cicala 0 Report post Posted March 25, 2009 Try to analyze this.Humans : Noobs trying to solve their existence through their basic science based on number of assumptions.Their Science is entirely based on their *OWN* senses. (eyes, nose, ears etc.) Smallest particle matter : You go on zooming over any particle. You finally land up with Atoms which contain nucleus and electrons revolving around it.You zoom in even further, you find that that the sub-atomic particles can be further classified. You see mesons rotating inside the nucleus and I don't think in present day, Humans have the technology to go past this limit.Anyways, my point is, you go in deeper inside matter and you see particles getting differentiated into even more fundamental objects. Lets Zoom Out now :In early days, humans discovered that moon rotates around Earth.Then, Earth around sun with other planets.Then Solar system itself rotating inside the galaxy and the galaxy iteself is also rotating.Even after defining the largest possible body (Universe), they still say its ever expanding, moving and rotating. I hope, you get what I have to say. Its a never ending loop until you find nothing zooming in further, or you will become infinitesimally small zooming out.I even don't agree with the CONCEPT of life which is defined by Humans saying that it requires X chemicals to be active.When life itself is a mystery beyond science, how can they define it and prove its existence on other planets. Life is something I define as a light which brings life in non-living (defined by us) things. In this case, Life is possible on moon, mars, sun or anything. If I bring every chemical present in a human cell and somehow manage to re-construct it. Where is the guarantee that it will become alive and start growing ?The only thing possible till date is cloning in which, everything starts with a living cell. :-) Nice info....Another idea, which is fact currently. Look into the sky long enough you'll be looking into the past. Distant starlight and the time it takes to get here is than calculated in years. [this is as simple as Sol [our sun] which is currently 8 light minutes away from earth, which is simple as saying look into the sun. "ur looking 8 minutes into the past". I believe the Universe we live in is theorized as 14.4 billion years and our solar system as 4.5 billion with a predicted 5.5 billion yrs to go hehe.....But if we were to keep looking.... What would we find?Just take this statement...... "When you look into the sky your looking into the past" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites