kobra500

Right the title is a bit of a misnomer because you do actually need one piece of software for this; but it is a software you all should have call "unlocker" which can be downloaded from the link given. Now for those of you who what unlocker is it is quite frankly one of the best pieces of software in existence because this software can remove those files that have been getting on your nerves. The corrupt file etc that you just can't get rid of, you can also use it to copy and move files that just don't want to move because they are locked down by softwares etc.

 

Now since I count this as a software no one should be without when I say without annoying software I really mean those rubbish youtube downloaders of which there are thousands but also that this is specifically for videos you've watched already and want to download without the inanity of redownloading it with some piece of rubbish software. Now if you wanted you could use this is place of downloading through software as I often do, all you have to do is open the video and let it run until the loading bar is fully red and the video is loaded.

 

So imagine this, you have just watched a youtube video, perhaps a music video or perhaps you might want to watch it later offline or maybe as in my case your cousin likes to play world of warcraft and therefore, his raid will be coming up soon and he'll be whining that he wants the internet to himself; whatever your reason it is useless downloading the video again or downloading any software at all (with the exception of the God of software's unlocker) so here's what you do. As all windows users should know you have a folder simply called "temp" which holds temporary files (go figure). for those of you who like me are on vista (and probably windows 7 it will be located at "C:\Users\YOURNAME\AppData\Local\Temp" and at a similar address for XP and older versions I am sure. if you visit this folder you will see a sea of oddly name files with odder extensions and one of these is your youtube video. Now if you want a mp4 version of the video you are better off with some rubbish software than with this trick, this is for people like me who use and love the worlds best mediaplayer "VLC media player" which you can find by googling the term. It is, no joke absolutely magnificent.

 

Now flash files always are name fla......... where the "dot dot dots" are replaced by a random string of numbers and possibly a letter or two as well, now if you're browser is like mine when you close the tab with the video (or the window) the temporary file disappears to never be seen again, so you should (assuming you still have the youtube video open and no other flash content) only have one fla.... file. If you have multiple make sure to close any other flash content and attempt to copy each in turn into a folder of any description, if it succeeds simply undo. The one you want will throw and error should you try to move it as it is still tied in with your browser of choice (google chrome in my case). Here's where God Unlocker does it's magic, right click on the file and click unlocker, there it will bring up a menu, it the bottom left corner click the drop down box and select copy and the choose the folder you wish to save it to, you're not done yet. Rename the file to the *.flv extension. You can now peruse the video at your leisure without expelling more bandwidth or having to be connected to the internet at all. You can if you so wish also change that file into another type of video of your choice with other free software's but really if your going to do that there are plenty more easier ways to do this. This doesn't just work with youtube but with all video players that I have used and possibly with flash games also, the key is that fla....... file in your temp folder which can be copied elsewhere.

I found the video, I had to change what I was searching for. I won't embed it, I'd rather actually link it, it's funny at least.

[http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/

I will PM you the video also Truefusion, or perhaps I'll post it here now it supports embedding videos straight in, Incidently you don't need to quote biblical verses I did read your post, I'm normally too lazy to quote but I will here:

 

Homosexuality implies lack of production on its own; it is incapble of producing young on its own. This is an absolute consequence of homosexuality. Creatures were designed to produce and multiply, and so homosexuality deviates from the natural?which implies that it is impossible to be born gay. Such a natural production brings joy and other positive feelings to the now family which would otherwise not have been present with homosexuality. Such a natural production is required for any such joy to be present and for any advancement of the race.

Right Okay, the key sentence is

Creatures were designed to produce and multiply

Creatures were not designed, they evolved. Okay you could argue that being Gay isn't an evolutionary advantage in terms of spreading your genes because obviously homosexual couples can spread said genes. But how is it impossible, it's possible to be born mentally ill, even if you conclude that homosexuality is like this then it is still possible. It's possible to be born infertile, and I repeat are you saying that infertile people or people who cannot have children are lesser, is the ability to reproduce with your partner make you lesser. Creatures evolved to multiply because evolution requires that creatures reproduce for it to work, but that doesn't make people who don't reproduce lesser, evolution doesn't make the Best survive but the ones that work in their environment. Of course I'm not saying that Environmental factors don't affect people, but people love who they love and it's clear that gays have always existed and will always exist as part of ALL mammals at least and we're just animals as well. But you ask why I appear to assume the bible? I don't think It's a red herring, it's easy to call something a red herring. You cannot give an argument that isn't religious which is a good argument against homosexuality, okay you've said that "Creatures were designed to multiply" but the concept of design is supernatural in of itself, Creatures weren't designed, that implies and intelligence, I can hear the biblical undertones, your opinions are almost always biblical.

 

And Joy to be present for advancement of the race? what does that even mean? Also I didn't quite get your last two sentences. And as for the video, I can't find it, it's on youtube I think one of the person I'm subbed to favourited it so I'll look through it.

I agree with Rob, it doesn't really effect British English because we already use 'S' in analyse etc. Or should I say that American-English uses 'Z' instead of 'S' since it is that way around. But although I don't see the point 'Z' is a pretty useless letter which mostly can be replaced by an 's' and 'x' in terms of xylophone but I'm pretty sure this wont happen.

Here's the Deal, people who deny right clicking to users should not make websites, secondly, I could print screen you image or use keyboard shortcut's for content, if you don't want something to be stolen or used well then you will rather have to not put them on the internet, as soon as you upload them to where people can see them then you are automatically subject to the idea that it can be stolen. obviously copyright law makes this process illegal but it's impossible to make people want to visit your website whilst having right click block on.

And Yet Capitalism works which is more than can be said for other systems, it's not perfect and whilst humanity remains imperfect (i.e. forever) it will stay like this. Maybe your alternative works but what then is the purpose of working hard and striving. People work hard because everyone wants wealth, it keeps the system working as the ambitious and the brilliant keep the system afloat. I don't disagree with you but I don't see another system working sufficiently well and I don't see it working from a political standpoint, democracy wouldn't allow for it I'm afraid and democracy is again the best flawed system we have! We need to stabilise the economy, the economy is based on buying and selling, people aren't buying and only selling so we hit recession. Thats what Obama is saying, he's saying put money into the economy to get out of the recession.I will admit the system is imperfect but no system is perfect and you'll just have to accept it, of course keep standing up for what you believe in, but in this case you are in the minority of people standing I'm afraid which is a shame.

No Truefusion, but since the ONLY real issues against homosexuality are derived Directly from religion, Name one Good argument AGAINST homosexuality that doesn't involve your interpretation of a Holy book that tells you that you can't eat shellfish or wear clothes of different fabrics, are they transcendent too? If that is your only argument then the laws forbidding homosexuality would directly go against the first amendment of your Country and Concerning overpopulation, sure moderation is a fairly comfortable when you are sitting snug at 6 billion but even if we embrace this lack of selfishness, which btw we won't the graph is getting steeper, so what about 7billion, 8 billion 10 billion human, 20 billion 100billion, homosexuality doesn't cause a problem by not having children because we don't need a bigger population it in no way benefits humanity and as medicine and science grows and lives extend and I note that you aren't complaining that your not living just 30 years no matter what eternity you believe in. Are infertile people lesser men and women too because they can't reproduce, are infertile people allowed to have sex if not for procreation? They are good candidates for adoption to save all those poor children born of the parents who rather couldn't look after them rather monetarily or they couldn't cope and who probably got into the situation because religion is sooo against teaching of safe sex. Especially the Catholic Church and I don't know about your views on the subject. Religion is a virus that spreads from Person to Person from indoctrination and broken promises, consuming minds so they are willing to believe that the mountains of evidence for one view or another is just a dung heap in a field somewhere, the sort of people who run "answersingenesis.com" which uses out of date science papers, often out of context to back up that there is a scientific conspiracy against religion and creation. The trouble is that for all the talk of being unselfish if you believe in Creation then you must believe that God created us flawed, it's nought to do with free will, psychopathics don't kill because they moved away from God, they kill because their mind is not functioning correctly, they are flawed before the fact. They aren't going to read the bible and it will be all better they will still be psychopaths and no matter how sorry I feel that they've been forced to live such an existence they need to be locked up for the safety of others, but your God according to you created them, he created them broken, and he wants them to burn for ever. How sick and twisted is that, you create life and then you torture it like a kid with a magnifying class to borrow a line from Bruce Almighty. Overpopulation is an issue and religion is not solving it, it is going against it, okay Catholicism and Islam mostly by telling people to do things that they are going to do, regardless and then not teaching them how to at least do it properly when they inevitably do. God must have created us flawed, because if we weren't then we wouldn't even consider going against Gods word even with free will, and psychopaths wouldn't exist, it has to be the this way around. @Bani, there is plenty of Evidence for Biological Causes of Homosexuality, I'll pm you the video when I found it that is really good at addressing the points. As for Moral absolutes, I will say that some morals whilst not innately wrong are certainly very close to it. But there are some which are breakable should you need to, or if you were put in a situation with a choice where the lesser of the evils is to break one moral. The source I would agree with you, isn't a book but I still say that Morals are based on society and on what is good for it and what is detrimental.

The French and the Spanish like to call everything HE & SHE and I find it ridiculously annoying because it makes learning which is which from an outsider all the more difficult, apart from the fact that inanimate objects and stars and clouds are completely asexual. Of course English too has its stupid rules and regulations which make it a pain for an outsider. Saying all this I will answer your question."she's" Sun, Earth, Clouds and Stars I would say"He's"by process of elimination Wind, Rain, Sky, Moon are he'sthough as I said, I don't like assigning genders to genderless things or spirits to well.... anything.But dualism is always a flawed concept to me, no matter how much we try to assign meanings to things, although we can successful do so that doesn't make them more than just atoms and molecules, not to say things are meaningless; far from it but that the meanings that we assign are not transcendent and are not reality they are just a concept or idea.

I would say this as an overall post: Maybe Jesus existed or maybe he didn't, for the most part it is irrelevant. If he did exist and if any of the story of him are true then he is truly a great man, but the question really is "is he the son of god" because even if you could prove he existed it's irrellivent, he most certainly didn't walk on water, he didn't cure the blind. What he did do is say things like turn the other cheek; which is pure gold in terms of morals, but he also said things like leave your family so he isn't perfect, he is JUST a man and nothing more or less. He often talked about God as a different person which makes me feel that Christianity has a cheek calling itself a monotheism and I don't care how the theologians try to spin it, you have 3 distinct Gods. I believe Jesus may or may not have existed but he certainly didn't defy physics or perform miracles. He is Just a man in history who has been written up to something he isn't or he is just a myth in history much like the ones of Greek mythology.

That is the single most awesome thing I have seen today, as for whether or not it's cruel, if it doesn't hurt or alienate the dogs then I think it's cuter than it is cool. If the dying process is harmful then obviously I disagree, but I doubt those sort of things would hurt the Dog, he looks happy in the picture. But I personally wouldn't do it but I do like it, it is interesting and a bit different.

Hi Sukhi and welcome to the "Sutra of Knowledge" enjoy your stay and I hope you will post great things from your routine life, the strict rules are there for a good reason and really make sure the content is good quality, the mods and users are really helpful as well, one thing though don't sign your name at the end of your posts, you'll get a telling off from the mods if you do, include any relevant info in your profile and then we can still all see it. Thanks and enjoy your stay at Xisto!

humans are very drawn to supernatural explanations and I don't know why, what I will say is I find it hard to believe that you ACTUALLY believe in what you say you do Mad, believing in something because you feel that believing in it gives life meaning is irrational to the highest degree. In life you draw your own meaning if you want to, why does life need a factual meaning, why can't you just live and enjoy it; or failing that just explore it, maybe that is a meaning to life, to live. The trouble is it's not fair to yourself to believe in God because you believe in God. Why don't you doubt your own experiences, I'm not saying you should doubt you had them, no one is calling you dishonest but until someone can show you why you had that experience you should at least be agnostic, how many times in the dark have you seen a figure and it was just a hoover or something else, the human mind can create the most complex faces and shapes imaginable (literally) so their not reliable evidence for God or any supernatural agent.I don't just get this human fixation with believing in the supernatural, if it's not God it's something else. If you think life has no meaning without God then you haven't thought about it, no the meaning will be bland and it won't be transcendent but it will hold meaning to you if no one else. If death isn't a fun concept, join the club, if you need someone to talk to consult someone who actually understand and actually can listen to you, if someone close is ill, don't pray for them, donate money to a research charity or do something, even if it won't save your love one it will go to hopefully helping people in your position rather than wasting your time, hands together praying for a miracle, there are miracles but there's nothing miraculous about them, just skill, luck and duct tape.

That's a complicated question. Some say that Evolution cannot change one species to another, of course they are wrong and we have mountains of evidence for this. But the other way of looking at it is "Can Evolution create a fire breathing dragon?" and I don't know, I'm not scientist. Evolution has to act within the laws of physics and mostly acts by natural selection, in a completely forced and falsified environment would it be possible to make a fire breathing dragon? I don't know. So my answer is a resounding I don't know and I don't know if an evolutionary biologist really knows, though they could give a better hypothesis than I could. All Evolution is tied to is the limits of natural laws and we haven't seen all what evolution can make, I know I haven't really said much but I really don't know.

The only thing wrong with the *new* forum is it's pretty dead at the moment, but that is an issue of users not of the software, it loads faster, I'm sure it's more efficient and when mycents are back up it will be great but these things take time and while it's down there is no reason not to post, to my knowledge you will be credited for the posts you make now and you might as well post and keep the forum active and alive. This is a great community so stop complaining it has been up pretty much continuously without hitch since I joined over 2 years ago now; it's understandable that sometimes that these things have to happen. So post people!

Actually the fact that Homosexual couples can't have children is a non-issue, our population is so high that lowering the number of people who actually have children turns out to be good and not bad to society. Moral absolutes don't exist in any innate way like you think they do, no action is wrong for the sheer fact it is wrong, you are right it is based on consequences, I will admit that within a society there are rules and laws which if everybody were to follow it would be good. But let's look at do not steal.Do not steal is a pretty good law, stealing anything is usually a bad Idea as it negatively affects the person you steal from.Stealing a loaf of bread to feed your starving family morally is acceptable, and yes it negatively affects the baker by lowering his profits but it saves a families life. Truefusion how does homosexuality affect society, as I discussed their are consequences, and those consequences is the effect it has on society. In fact scrap that how does it affect you personally? I'm not asking how it affects your holy book, I know for a fact in the same chapter it tells you not to eat shellfish but think about it from a secular viewpoint, What your holy book says shouldn't and doesn't mean anything to a society like your own, in fact disallowing homosexuality on the basis of religion is unconstitutional, and outside of religion and moral absolutes what real negative to homosexuality is there. I'm not just bashing your religion but it seems religion in general and that's all homophobic religions are the only thing standing in the way of this.As I said above, I didn't really mention much about consequences and as I said in this text consequences weren't mentioned by word, the consequences are effects that it has. I also believe that children with exception if brought up with a relatively unbias education who are taught the facts will mostly make the correct decision in life, namely choose to go for the one that is beneficial to society.

My stance as I was telling Baniboy in the chatroom is fairly similar but has a few key differences.

Now like Baniboy I don't believe in moral absolutes, I believe that the concept of right and wrong however, is within all of us biologically, even babies LINK, and these were placed in through evolutionary conditioning, much in the way of instincts where animals can find their way to a place they've never been before or not been since they hatched, turtles for example are like this. I would say that as we have evolved into a society based species relying very much on a society and authority figures the society is the key thing in deciding right or wrong, things that help a society therefore, are right and those things that are detrimental to the society are wrong such that there is a clear basis for right or wrong and such that the words are in fact interchangeable, saying something is detrimental to society is the same as saying it is wrong. I believe that laws are very much a collective opinion of what is good for society and what is bad which are generally held for the majority at large. Of course ideas can be influenced by outside sources which have been passed down through things such as religion which are people own individual and often unjustified biases and these have an effect on what is considered right and wrong but these are usually indoctrinated into people from birth, essentially overriding the opinions they would otherwise take having looked at the evidence so much so sometimes that they are immune to changing opinion. An action can be innately right or wrong in general terms but obviously there are exceptions such murder is okay in self defence, but killing a killer actually benefits a society and is not detrimental, meanwhile killing an innocent is detrimental.

The following is an example of how what benefits a society ultimately wins out but also where people biases come into it but also how biases change what people interpret to be right or wrong but there is an overall answer to whether something is right or wrong.
Now Gay Marriage, let's analyse the arguments.

All animals of which we are one almost without exception have shown homosexual behaviour in the wild therefore it IS natural.
Homosexuality is shown by studies and evidence to in fact be biological and not in fact a choice. (you are born like it most of the time)
It doesn't negatively impact anyone at all in anyway.
Gay couples are the same as straight couples and both sets love each other in the same way.
it's unfair for straight couples to have more rights than gay couples.

Now let's look at the arguments against

Some peoples personal biases mean they rather have something against Gay marriage because their Holy text says so or because their parents told them it is wrong
If anyone can think of more let me know.

As you can see the positive outweigh the negative and the positives are backing in statistics and peer reviewed studies, where the against is almost entirely religious and are entirely formed out of preconceived bias and cannot explain how it will negatively affect society which I have discussed is the key to whether or not something is right or wrong. Except maybe God's wrath but again there is no evidence outside of scripture.

It is definitely beneficial as people who are gay can enter into wedlock and are not alienated as being lesser than straight people and lets face it, everybody loves a wedding!

and yes I've been harsh on religion here but really, what religion has to say on what is right or wrong is irrespective of what is right or wrong in my opinion. since I am basing Morals on society and not on a holy book written by fallible human hands.

You're a moderator now Anwii? god their just letting everyone in now and yes I did have truefusion in mind when I wrote that, only because I really wanted peoples takes on what I said, more than the bibles with no real input from the individual, saying that it didn't mean that I didn't want any biblical stuff providing it was relevant and I still say that an "irresistible happiness" which sounds more like "forced happiness" to me seems to take away something from me, which makes me, me. It just all sounds, for want of a better word: "eh"

Up until this point it was easy to follow you. But if i can understand anything, i would assume that you assume that life in, say, heaven will pretty much consist slightly of the same things that are now with the exception that you will be given just about anything that pleases the self. This only supports the assumption without much if any change. But the proper way to look at it all may involve assuming that in heaven you can only be glad. For reference's sake, you may call this "irresistable happiness." It cannot be contradicted or denied; it cannot be devalued or degraded. It is as if it is a law that everyone follows which they cannot act against. This does away with any dilemma which you might assume would exist.

 

 

This assumption is clearly refuted by any religion that claims a heaven and hell (though merely the concept of hell is all that is needed, but where there is a hell there is bound to be a heaven too), for if the reason for the creation of the religion were so as to remove the fear of dying, why would they amplify any fear of dying (which is another assumption; that is, assuming that there is a fear of dying) by introducing hell? Don't ask me why people don't see this, as it is a question more proper for those who assume that religion is born do to fearing death rather than anything it states. What makes things more interesting is when you find scripture that likewise contradicts such an assumption (e.g. Ecclesiastes 7:1).

 

Sorry, I don't think that religion is JUST born out of fear of death, there's more factors than that however, look at the religions, how many of them say that when you die, that's it. That at some point there isn't something or that you are reborn or whatever, every religion that I can think of including the ones you don't believe in and including the first religions has something to say about death. The hell part is simple, you need a threat keep people in line, hell is a deterrent of infinite volume but that's all it is, an empty threat but I think I'm write in saying that heaven came before hell, and I'm talking about in the heads of the fallible humans who are the parents of Christianity and all other religions. I don't think it's been refuted sufficiently enough the trouble with philosophy and theology is that they work on assumptions, even my own rebuttals at least to things that scientifically have no answer can be argued fully against and visa versa meaning although you can argue both sides, neither side can win. I think that the mere fact that all religions are so similar in there tales of a supreme afterlife is pretty sharp evidence for my point but I work as someone who already believes religion is man made and am simply interpreting the author(s) you see it as something more.

 

Your explanation is too easy from my perspective and an irresistible happiness as I said though maybe not degrading certainly deals away with, in my opinion what makes me, me. and I will also add that your argument is simply, you will be happy and this deals away with anything you've said, I don't want to be eternally happy, I don't want to be eternally damned either, I want to be eternally dead.

This doesn't set out to be offensive, it doesn't really set out to do much more than convey my opinion, and I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts on what I have to say, but don't just quote scripture at me, I want people own, individual thoughts on the subject and what I have to say.Now this post won't really delve deep into a religious debate, that's not what I'm after, I just want to draw on a few things about the concept of eternal bliss after death and this apply's to all religious that hold that concept. I'm going to base this on assumptions, and this is opinion not science, the first is as follows. In life without suffering it's impossible to really not take for granted the good things, if you have infinite wealth you don't value your money whereas someone with £5 to their name will likely value that £5 a lot more, especially if they've got to live on that money. The same concept apply's, if you work in a morgue you become immune to the trouble that seeing death and seeing the dead gives to most people, is the same not true of happiness, eternal bliss. If you never suffer the value to you of the experiences you have that would be significantly lower, almost to the point perhaps as just plain boredom, where you will take things for granted and it works both ways, someone who escaped the slums of Africa due to charity will value their good experiences much more than I value mine at the present, they don't take the good things for granted at all because they have the knowledge of their own suffering which leads on to my second point.If you die and go to heaven, you meet all your long forgotten relatives the idea that the you won't suffer, that all your suffering and emotional baggage will just disappear, and of course it can't disappear else it would be a cold shell of your former self that went to heaven since we are the product of our experiences, secondly nothing has changed, your relatives and friends that outlived you are the equivalent of dead to you, you may as well be alive and the others dead, the only thing you've done is swap one set of people for a different set and you would have accepted that one set was dead already leaving you with more people to now accept and I don't think that now because you KNOW you'll see them again when they die it makes it any better because time will have passed and they will have moved on, it's impossible to recapture the same effect after it has passed, I think everybody had tried that and I doubt it has ever been the same the second time round. Then we come back to my first point, if heaven is eternal bliss then that seems to me to be incredibly dull, an eternity of the same anything well get boring and the lack of suffering will in my opinion devalue the experience you do have, sure you still have your baggage but after 1 million years that will be so far behind you it will be ridiculous.Isn't it easier to just die, religion is clearly born out of this fear of dying, surely even the most religious people will accept that the religions that they believe are false have death as a factor to there existence or at least they should. Though I'm talking about the God's they don't believe in. But I don't get the huge fuss around death, sure it doesn't sound fun but it is inevitable and you should accept that, acceptance shows you are healthy, wouldn't it be easier to just not exist, except as part of everyone no matter how briefly you have touched in your life, as part of their experiences however, small passed down generation to generation but never truly dieing out just becoming less and less significant. Why can't you just rest? why don't people want to? before you were born never bothered anyone before! what is wrong with the idea of the end? the end is peaceful, less than sleep, less than blackness, "nothing" a concept no one truly can understand. why not? what is so bad about it? Why do you need eternity? I would choose death any day!

I don't know what book your authoring but mine is vastly different from yours, I'm trying to think of a suitable analogy.

 

The expression 'the best things in life are free' is an expression and should be treated as such, I think you are looking too deep into it, what it's saying is the BEST, the truly great and things people derive meaning from within life are those things that you can't buy in a supermarket, on Amazon. or bid for on ebay. My laptop for instance, using it I enjoy, maybe your right maybe it is just contentment, but happiness and contentment are not exactly add odds with each other, are you happy whilst content and content whilst happy? the definitions are ambiguous at best.

 

Anyway I do distinguish between "do material possessions bring happiness" & "do material possessions lie at the root of happiness" are different questions in my opinion. one is very shallow and to me asks: "does my bicycle bring me happiness" well sure I love riding my bicycle, I would go as far to say my bicycle makes me happy. The latter asks "yes but does it truly make you happy" it is a much deeper question and here I'd have to agree with your point to some degree, It's all very well having a bicycle but eventually I'll get bored of riding it, but you know what never gets tiring, riding my bicycle for hours with friends, I could do that forever and it would never get old, friendship it seemed you can't get bored of, that's more what I meant, and maybe I meant what you said, material possessions make you content and they bring happiness to you for the time you use them but the "free things" in life never get old, never get tiring, and sure you fall out with friends, you fall out of love and there are sad bits and angry and annoyed bits, No one is truly happy 24/7 regardless, life has to have suffering else how do you understand the truly good bits, a perfect world would be dull at least in my opinion. But yeah food for thought. I suppose I can conclude with the question stated above "are you content whilst happy and happy whilst content?"

As many will know I'm not religious, nor am I spiritual but I fancy myself a philosopher. To summarise the title "do material possessions bring happiness". Well the answer is a resounding yes of course they do, If I buy a game I have fun with that video game I am happy and therefore, the possession has brought me happiness. But I'm being unfair, taking a literal interpretation to a question which isn't asking "do material possessions bring happiness" but is more asking "do material possessions lie at the root of happiness" or at least that's how I choose to interpret it. Well they say the best things in life are free and I'd have to agree, love, hate emotion in general, social interaction, family, sex (unless you pay for it in which case it isn't free), and friendship etc. these things are more important and bring more jubilation than sheer wealth of possessions. Me and my friend walked to the pub and back today in a lovely village 4 hour round trip today and I had more fun talking than any of my possessions could provide for example.So in conclusion, no possessions do not lie at the root of happiness and while they do bring happiness they are far lesser than many of the more social and free experiences you can have in life. I will also add you don't need God or to believe in some other spirit or supernatural agent to come to this conclusion, you can get what people take from God, namely encouragement, strength, willpower from those around you and give it back also, and you will be a happier individual for it!

I don't think $100 a year is that bad, for one I can easily earn $1 a day by posting so over if you can get $1 every 3 days your laughing, and also

This hosting is best for my members who are interested in giving a lot of data, graphics, music and videos for download

- I'll hold you to that opaque. $100 dollars for hosting is no biggy and while the lack of addon domains is a shame I'll admit, I think perhaps opaque should perhaps open them up as a feature (It may help him sell more domains).

Short, Sweet and to the point, I like it. Firstly Hello and welcome to Xisto, enjoy your stay. Secondly a formality: Please check out the readme for more information on the rules etc of Xisto. You can also find this link above the shoutbox.

If you want to know anything else about Xisto, the forum or Mycents then feel free to ask. Otherwise with repetition, enjoy your stay, make good quality posts. I hope you will be a real asset to this forum.

I was on farmville and played it religiously, but now day I don't play any facebook games, I use facebook as facebook to connect with friends, I admit some people do spend there lives on the various facebook games, my aunt in particular plays: Country Life, Farmville, Petville, and countless others everyday. It's kinda sad in a way but hey. Whatever boats your float.

Well that weird, I don't think I can think of a time when Windows Troubleshoot actually fixed the problem, though actually the connections issue resolver on vista is actually quite impressive how it actualy gets to the bottom of issues.