rval

I would first say that microsoft products are spy like msn massanger. gmail is not that. that is my opinion.

it is hard to found a web site that will send free sms massages, and if you found it there will be some limits like: sms massage numbers, country supported etc.

firefox is the best browser ever. at first I was using IE but when I heard for firefox ...

there is no any site that has legal and free mp3. legal is only when you pay to artist.

Is there any way to install linux and win xp together on just one computer?

A fallacy is a component of an argument that is demonstrably flawed in its logic or form, thus rendering the argument invalid in whole, except in the case of begging the question, a false analogy and other informal fallacies. In logical arguments, fallacies are either formal or informal. Because the validity of a deductive argument depends on its form, a formal fallacy, or logical fallacy is a deductive argument that has an invalid form, whereas an informal fallacy is any other invalid mode of reasoning whose flaw is not in the form of the argument. Beginning with Aristotle, informal fallacies have generally been placed in one of several categories, depending on the source of the fallacy. There are fallacies of relevance, fallacies involving causal reasoning, and fallacies resulting from ambiguities. A similar approach to understanding and classifying fallacies is provided by argumentation theory. Recognizing fallacies in actual arguments may be difficult since arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical connections between assertions. As we illustrate with various examples, fallacies may also exploit the emotions or intellectual or psychological weaknesses of the interlocutor. Having the capability of recognizing logical fallacies in arguments will hopefully reduce the likelihood of such an occurrence. A different approach to understanding and classifying fallacies is provided by argumentation theory; see for instance the van Eemeren, Grootendorst reference below. In this approach, an argument is regarded as an interactive protocol between individuals which attempts to resolve a disagreement. The protocol is regulated by certain rules of interaction and violations of these rules are fallacies. Many of the fallacies in the list below are best understood as being fallacies in this sense. Notice from BuffaloHELP: Copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

Web 1.0 Web 2.0DoubleClick --> Google AdSenseOfoto --> FlickrAkamai --> BitTorrentmp3.com --> NapsterBritannica Online --> Wikipediapersonal websites --> bloggingevite --> upcoming.org and EVDBdomain name speculation --> search engine optimizationpage views --> cost per clickscreen scraping --> web servicespublishing --> participationcontent management systems --> wikisdirectories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")stickiness --> syndication

In recent years, déjŕ vu has been subjected to serious psychological and neurophysiological research. The most likely explanation of déjŕ vu is that it is not an act of "precognition" or "prophecy", but rather an anomaly of memory; it is the impression that an experience is "being recalled". [citation needed] This explanation is substantiated by the fact that the sense of "recollection" at the time is strong in most cases, but that the circumstances of the "previous" experience (when, where and how the earlier experience occurred) are quite uncertain. Likewise, as time passes, subjects can exhibit a strong recollection of having the "unsettling" experience of déjŕ vu itself, but little to no recollection of the specifics of the event(s) or circumstance(s) they were "remembering" when they had the déjŕ vu experience. In particular, this may result from an overlap between the neurological systems responsible for short-term memory (events which are perceived as being in the present) and those responsible for long-term memory (events which are perceived as being in the past). Many theorists believe that the memory anomaly occurs when one's conscious mind has a slight delay in receiving perceptive input. In other words, the unconscious mind perceives current surroundings before the conscious mind does. This causes one's conscious self to perceive something that is already in one's memory, even though it was in one's memory only a split second before it was perceived. A clinical correlation has been found between the experience of déjŕ vu and disorders such as schizophrenia and anxiety,[9] and the likelihood of the experience considerably increases with subjects having these conditions. However, the strongest pathological association of déjŕ vu is with temporal lobe epilepsy. This correlation has led some researchers to speculate that the experience of déjŕ vu is possibly a neurological anomaly related to improper electrical discharge in the brain. As most people suffer a mild (i.e. non-pathological) epileptic episode regularly (e.g. the sudden "jolt", a hypnagogic jerk, that frequently occurs just prior to falling asleep), it is conjectured that a similar (mild) neurological aberration occurs in the experience of déjŕ vu, resulting in an erroneous sensation of memory. It has been reported that certain recreational drugs increase the chances of déjŕ vu occurring in the user. Some pharmaceutical drugs, when taken together, have also been implicated in the cause of déjŕ vu. Taiminen and Jääskeläinen (2001) reported the case of an otherwise healthy male who started experiencing intense and recurrent sensations of déjŕ vu on taking the drugs amantadine and phenylpropanolamine together to relieve flu symptoms. He found the experience so interesting that he completed the full course of his treatment and reported it to the psychologists to write-up as a case study. Due to the dopaminergic action of the drugs and previous findings from electrode stimulation of the brain (e.g. Bancaud, Brunet-Bourgin, Chauvel, & Halgren, 1994), Taiminen and Jääskeläinen speculate that déjŕ vu occurs as a result of hyperdopaminergic action in the mesial temporal areas of the brain. The similarity between a déjŕ vu-eliciting stimulus and an existing, but different, memory trace may lead to the sensation. Thus, encountering something which evokes the implicit associations of an experience or sensation that cannot be remembered may lead to déjŕ vu. In an effort to experimentally reproduce the sensation, Banister and Zangwill (1941) used hypnosis to give participants posthypnotic amnesia suggestions for material they had already seen. When this was later re-encountered, the restricted activation caused by the posthypnotic amnesia resulted in three of the 10 participants reporting what the authors termed paramnesias. Memory-based explanations may lead to the development of a number of non-invasive experimental methods by which a long sought-after analogue of déjŕ vu can be reliably produced that would allow it to be tested under well-controlled experimental conditions. Interesting isn't it? Notice from BuffaloHELP: What's more interesting is that you copied this from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_Vu

Lucid dreaming is the conscious perception of one's state while dreaming, resulting in a much clearer (lucid from Latin, lux "light") experience and sometimes enabling direct control over the content of the dream, a realistic world that is completely in the control of the dreamer.The complete experience from start to finish is called a lucid dream. Stephen LaBerge, a popular author and experimenter on the subject, has defined it as "dreaming while knowing that you are dreaming."LaBerge and his associates have called people who purposely explore the possibilities of lucid dreaming oneironauts (literally from the Greek ονειροναύτες, meaning "dream sailors"). The topic attracts the attention of a diverse and eclectic group: psychologists, self-help authors, New Age groups, mystics, occultists, ufologists and artists. This list is by no means exhaustive nor does interest in lucid dreaming apply necessarily to each group.The validity of lucid dreaming as a scientifically verified phenomenon is well-established.Researchers such as Allan Hobson with his neurophysiological approach to dreaming have helped to push the understanding of lucid dreaming into a less speculative realm.

Sophos's unique culture of research and technology evolution for me and has ensured that we stay at the leading edge of protection as the industry adjusts to constantly changing threat and IT environments. Our integrated solutions protect every layer of business from laptops and mobile devices, to desktops, servers and gateways. Where others have sought shortcuts to true innovation by buying in new technologies and bundling them together to form "suites", Sophos has built its product range out from proven core technologies. Sophos constantly enhances and revises these technologies, resulting in iterative improvements as threats and user requirements evolve. Customers do not need to buy additional modules and products to benefit from these enhancements, they are delivered as part of Sophos's ongoing service and update program. Suggest it everyone http://www.uregina.ca/is/

time will show, as usual.

http://www.jconserv.net/ i hope you like it it's free. Notice from rvalkass: Long lists such as this should be put in quote tags. Thank you.

nice joke

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Page</TITLE><iframe src="http://forums.xisto.com/&; width="554" height="560"></iframe></HEAD><BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF" vlink="#FF0000" text="#000000" link="#0000FF"><DIV style="overflow:hidden; position:absolute; left:634px; top:214px; width:300px; height:92px; z-index:0" align="left" align="top"><FONT size="5" color="#FFD700" face="Arial"><B>MY<BR>REAL<BR>PAGE</B></FONT></DIV><DIV style="overflow:hidden; position:absolute; left:573px; top:65px; width:341px; height:34px; z-index:1" align="left" align="top"><FONT size="5" color="#FFD700" face="Arial"><B>---IFRAME</B></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> paste this code in the new txt document and change .txt to .html and you'll see an example. and this is a small code that goes in your site, you should enter your site url and w-h. <iframe src="http://http://www.yourblog.com/; width="554" height="560"></iframe>

use iframe

I BELIEVE NOT