sylenzednuke

I tend to agree with most of you here. We are just hitting back racism with more and more racism, pointless, hypocritical racism.But something is needed, something IS needed for their upliftment of "minorities" that was cause due to our ancestral prejudices. But it surely isn't the thing we have now. Stop treating black men like dogs and the problem is solved. Having agencies won't do any good. Quotas won't do any good either, especially in the field of education and jobs. People seem to fail to realize where the problem is. Have better early-education schemes for minorities, this would make them to the level of majorities and so they can all have a healthy competition for the living. You can't just leave the minorities to their early miseries and then in the end lend them some pseudo-help.Religious grading as minorities and majorities are the worse though. It just doesn't make sense. Why should Muslims be considered minorities in the end? Aren't they all just like us? It's just that they follow some different rules of life that we don't, but don't we all have our own? In India, apart from the upper-caste Hindus, everyone is considered a minority. Be it Muslims, Jews, Christians, Sikhs or even lower-caste Hindus.Maybe it's because of my hate towards religion (not to be mistaken with hate towards God or something, I am not Satanist. I am an Atheist but I have no problem with a guy having a force of hope for him, an upper being that guides him but religion? I am sorry, I can't tolerate religion and the nuisances it causes, in the end most religions tend to go against nature, the real God) that I feel religious grading is pointless, but don't you all feel so either?There was rage and anger in students when the OBC quotas in colleges and universities were being planned on increasing. There were riots, revolts, protests and what not and things are still hanging in there. What would be more helpful? A person who doesn't know much like the other people he's with but still getting same priveleges and sometimes more? Are we actually helping them? The government should put up better schools for the "minorities" so that they later become as illegible for something as a majority would.Quotas are making things worse, upliftment is far from what we are getting in return.

I agree with Linekill. Maybe his looks might be making you not feel like going towards him, but be his friend for now. Maybe his personality would be too good for you to even care anymore for his looks or what other people would tease you or mock you.Standards are just generalizations cast by the media. Low self-esteem is the perfect sellers dream after all. Just because they exist doesn't mean you have to follow them. It just requires a thinking, what do YOU want. How is that possible that someone else tells you what you want or need? It's a "trend" you can say here to have a girlfriend/boyfriend, maybe even for the heck of it and you might not even know the other person well. But I feel actually better-off being without one 'cause I haven't found the right girl for now. And I know from other's experiences it's hard and irritating to live upto the expectations of a person you couldn't care less for.If you really feel like, just go for him. Well personally I would advise you to first be his friend, know him more and then decide over. I get this feeling it won't be that hard for you either to care less for his height or anything other than that either as you actually noticed him and gave it a thought. Most people tend to stay away from this too! Good luck for whatever you plan to do.

It may not be the first planet, but it sure is the first "known" planet to have survived the Red-giant phase. I never really got the chance to see that show on Discovery Channel but it's not hard to imagine what would happen if the hottest thing ever we would be exposed to is going to just take us in it. But I think, by the time the Earth would be sucked into the Sun, majority of the species would've already been dead. Or maybe the chances are our hopes and predictions would go all wrong and we might just extinct out. There is another show on Discovery which used to show how humans would find new homes and how the entire web of species on Earth would change. But it's all hypothetical. There are enormous amounts of problems that we would face while even traveling through space, finding a new home is an all different ordeal. There were 5 I guess, it was another show on discovery. Now they are obviously trying to try and avoid these problems or rather stay away from then. Gene manipulation to survive from those extremely deadly radiations. Again gene mutation to trigger hibernation so that humans would survive those long-distance travels which might consume 100 to 200 years without aging out much either. Re-producing in space has loads of it's own problems too. The only known hope now is that some extra-terrestrial species have been evolved way before us and would be way more advanced than us and so they would've figured this problem out. But then there are various problems for aliens once they manage coming down here to our home. Bacteria, levels of oxygen, change in gravity, air pressures, atmospheric cover and many other things. But then again hypothesis that they would be advanced enough to find a way out of all of these. But probably the biggest problem for us after they arrive home. Would they be hostile? We don't care. But what if they chose not to speak to us at all? Assuming they're advanced enough to have a language far more complex than any human language, they're more likely to rather converse with whales instead of us as they still have more complex languages than us as shown by studies. But being the most "successful" species on Earth, we do have some hope they'd care a bit for us. I just know for sure this ain't happening soon enough. It will take time or these problems might never be solved. Something or the other IS going to kill is anyway, so why's the worry? If we find a way out, then it's good, otherwise if not this, something else will kill us. Maybe something quite much happening on Earth itself might make us extinct, you just don't know.

It really depends on the situation. If I am moving to a new city permanently, I would rather chose to buy a new home by my own money or if not possible then take a loan from the bank. 'cause renting a house would be way more costlier and actually dumb when you know you're gonna be here for a while, maybe more than 2 decades! Buying a house, be it on loans would be way more beneficial and cheap in the long-run. If it's just for a year or two regarding studies. Then it's better to rent out a house.But one thing's there. If I would've come from Delhi (Washington D.C. of India) to Mumbai (New York City of India), and if I had hard cash. I would buy up a house. And then give it away on rent while I am back in Delhi and when the prices raise high, sell it out.

I always knew braces would get people some kind of a problem. No one really told me what they were but it was just plain common sense that some metal in your teeth can't feel good. XD But I never knew it used to pain so much! Well, but didn't the dentist already advice you the methods to stay away from the pain? I mean the advice that take non-solid foodstuffs for some weeks and all? That would've been helpful. As advised by people who've gone through this before, try to intake only non-solid foodstuffs for a while, milk would really help if you like it. Just hang in there for a while, in the end you're on the receiving end! Friendly advice, screw that. Do what you'd be comfortable with.

Caffeine is a drug for obvious reasons. Tigercat explained this in the best way. My parents, my friends. Most can't stay a day without coffee/tea, and well my Dad needs 6 cups of tea atleast in a day so that he doesn't end up getting headaches and becomes lazy. I never liked coffee. NEVER. I was introduced to it when I was 10, I am 15 now and I just have never liked coffee. I hated drinking milk in the start anyway. Now I don't mind drinking milk as I know it was just my immaturity that I wanted to disobey my parents, I actually love milk. So I knew there were some problems relating to it but this topic really like made it just all the more stronger. All I've ever known is that it IS really addictive. Now I know that those "weird behaviors" were just withdrawal symptoms. I'm an insomniac, and I love it this way, I don't mind the dark circles either. Caffeine is of no use to me actually. But some of my friends really need to see this topic. Lactose intolerance isn't something which is really concentrated in just one area. Some people are intolerant to lactose and it's the same all around the world. It doesn't limit to Africans or Asians, I know couple of people from countries like Germany, USA and Norway who are lactose intolerant too. I am not and I am an Asian (Well, Indian. I don't look Chinese/Japanese or whatever.).

If my memory serves me right, I've met 18 online friends in real life and I currently plan on meeting 13 more. For me, it has always been a pleasurable experience to meet people I've spoken to and know well online! For me, I am more open online than in real life, my real life friends from 3 years don't know half of what my online friends (whom I've met in real life) do in like a year or two. I was always able to cultivate good friendship online rather than in real life ... but not random ones I meet on chat rooms, people from this one social networking site named orkut, loads of people from the neighborhood and especially from nearby schools and regular gig-goers. My current best friend is a girl I met online who lives like 5 blocks away from me. The guys I like to jam with, I have met them online too! And I've even made enemies online! I hardly make new friends in real life, but I guess I will once I get to college in like a week or two. Meeting online friends in real life enlarged my almost non-existent social circle.

Really nice site! Clean layout and a funny and straight logo, which I loved the most about the layout. Colors seem to go well and loved the idea. The only thing I didn't like is the content placement, for a guy like me, who would just stumble upon a site and drag his eyes around for 5 seconds, you get a feeling of being lost for a minute or two. I guess you have just recently started. Good luck with your site! :PI have a rantblog too but it isn't much though I plan on making it bigger and better.

It's not that Punk bands aren't supposed to be "well known", Ramones, Clash, CRASS all are well known, so you mean to say that makes them un-Punk? The problem lies when Punk bands get into the Popular Culture and turn their heads to Money-minting record labels and change their mind-set. That is when the problem arises. When Punk bands start supporting the Popular Culture mind-set, all useless songs with no meaning, trends and all, that's when the problem arises. I don't even care that Rise Against are so well known, they rock, bands like Rise Against, Bane and Anti-flag are keeping Punk alive and that's what matters to me. Oh, I would definitely LOVE to have a look at those lyrics. For the time I have just written paragraphs and one-liners on Punk sub-culture and the various aspects of it. I agree, I mean why people prefer Avril Lavigne over Britney Spears? Because Avril claims she's Punk! I don't really see an iota of difference in Avril and Britney. I actually have a little respect for Britney. She accepts she's an idiot while Avril doesn't and Toxic has an addictive bass-line. I see kids sticking awful names to themselves everyday in and around me and it kinda just pisses me off badly. I've heard alot about NOFX and Leftover Crack but for some reason could never get my hands onto their music. I will try downloading some soon.

I really think the last 2 topics from what Tiki mentioned are good to be researched upon. Combining melting glaciers with effects on the jet streams seems very interesting too as it's affected the land and us also in the long-run. Good luck!

Dude, you just took everything out right from my mouth! I'll be in college in a month and then after some months I am willing to form my own punk/hardcore/metalcore (I don't believe in sticking to genres like water-tight containers) band. 'cause it kinda sucks how kids today listen to stuff like blink-182 and call themselves Punk while partying and it's just that it's another form of popularity and not at all Punk. Punk is about being different not forming a clique of your own and willing everyone to follow, you're just creating a parallel Pop cult. And it's not only about the "hate, kill, hate, kill" attitude according to me. I say Punk can also tell people that a better future is possible, socio-political issues can be raised so well with Punk rock! And it kinda sucks how Punk is misunderstood. The way they look is so much stereotyped and laid assumptions on and it kinda feels like others are living in a bubble thinking their life is great and they are good and they transpose all their darkness onto us. I am a straight-edge and some of the people I know who listen to BSB take drugs, smoke and almost everything and still people won't think twice before calling me a nutwreck, a drug-addict and what not but will respect those guys like hell. For years the Indian rock circuit had only metal and metal bands, all cover and tribute bands, lately some bands took it their duty to show the stagnant country and new face of music. Now we have some great original metal bands here and some are even going to tour with Children of Bodom after some years! And even some Punk (lately, India was still unknown to Punk) and Alternative bands. I only know of 2 good Punk bands throughout the country, and it kinda sucks. It just gives me so much motivation to form a PUnk band of my own and help rock 'n' roll in general in India. All for the love of rock! Punk is not dead if a country like India can still have good Punk rock bands, it's just again sleeping I guess, and we need more bands to wake Punk up and make Pop-punk and Emo and all that *BLEEP* dead! And the last line just makes so much sense!

I agree with Alex here. That thief should've been smart enough to realize that whatever his crime will be, he'll be sentenced for a life-time according to that law. I can't think why such a law still didn't stop him from doing all this. But on the other side, I am completely against this law, it just sounds stupid to me to be honest. Those 3 crimes should be atleast taken into consideration and not just their numbers. I mean stealing and stuff? I don't think a life-time is fair for that! Those 3 "strikes" should be first reviewed first atleast if the law can't be taken back. Or it'd be better to just abolish this law according to me 'cause I really find it disgusting. 3 strikes and a life-sentence, is this some sort of a joke or something? Sorry for sounding like this but I didn't ever expect law to get this stupid.

Crazymind21 gets my vote! Really nice border and the image used is good too, really catches your eye in between all of the sigs around it. The only thing wrong with it is the text, Paradise gets overlooked and the name is just too small. Great none the less!

I am not really an American, but yes, I guess this policy should stay where it is or the military personnel should be cleared of all the doubts they might have about homosexuality. Though it does sound awkward that homosexuals shouldn't disclose their sexual orientation but then it's only for the better functioning of the army. And that's what makes me say too that it should stay where it is. But educating the people on homosexuality can be another option but I guess just keeping it a secret would do for no unless everyone has cleared out all his doubts about homosexuality.

One of the most detailed introductions I've ever seen! Well, never too late to introduce yourself and ofcourse Sarah is easier to type than Mermaid711. Good to see an artist here. Welcome, I guess you're well aware of the rules here, both forum-wise and shoutbox-wise. Hope you have greater time here in future and happy further posting!

Well if you'd seen my first post I did mention that the extremist Muslims are forcing people to think that way with their acts, not that I mean it! Granting someone Knighthood is so not propagating a war against anything. And as far as I see, the wars are against extremists and not Muslims at large, though I am against those wars anyways as there are just too many conspiracies lying underneath the "war against terrorism" ... we're making enemies faster than we can pick up a gun. Having no trust and fretting over something totally irrelevant just don't go hand in hand according to me. You can't trust someone so you want to take off the right to be awarded something and in extreme cases take away the right of life? Islam's bad state is not 'cause of people against it, it's 'cause of the extremists boiling our blood with their hypocrisy to go against it. I for one am not against any religion, but when religion interferes in society and world affairs, it does affect me. I personally have nothing to do with Muslims or Islam or Allah or Prophet Muhammad. But acts like these by extremists are unbearable for me. And I wrote "extremist" everytime before Muslims, 'cause it was directed towards people who support Osama but fret over this like Zakir Naik. If you can allow yourself to hurt hundreds of people, get ready for hundreds of people to hurt you back, you have no right to fret over it then. And I do feel the whole protest a complete stupidity. The book has absolutely nothing to do with the Knighthood.

Well atleast I am ready to work on this as soon as it's possible for you guys! Well, you mean a simple WYSIWYG editor, right? Well, we have something known as TinyMCE [link] that could help us with this! It's open source and this WYSIWYG editor can be fit into pretty easily, so we don't have to code it right from scratch and it'll be easier now and there are loads of plug-ins available for this and a nice community willing to help I guess. It's 100% Javascript but we can implement AJAX into it if we find someone good in programming AJAX. But I guess it won't be of much help as we'll have a layout set-up and we need a content adder and simply way of letting the users change a bit of HTML and add/edit CSS. But still, have a look and think if we have some use of this. Maybe apart from the rest of the page we can use this to add the "autobiography" which would just be one long essay with links. The pics and various other uploads and side-information can be placed elsewhere on the page. I would like you to check TinyMCE first, I guess it'll be way easier than having rvalkass code it up from scratch, while TinyMCE will lessen the burden, he can concentrate more on other things as he looks like he can help in many ways! That'd be a good idea but we need candidates (suggesstions) before the poll is set-up first. I guess the internet has various free poll scripts so for now we can work with them! Some of them: StylePoll [link] Advanced Poll Script (HotScripts.com) [link] Yeah, a domain name is a must, first name has to be decided depending on whether the domain name is available or no as having a different domain and a different name would just not be right. Paid hosting can be left for later, once we are done building the site completely and testing it with the few staff that we would have. Hope the voting takes place soon and we get good available names. Uploading music is a good idea, but I still think letting people upload their videos on YouTube and then just embedding it onto their pages would be a way better idea. And these videos would be viewable on YouTube too, which would kinda make our site more popular if someone mentions this in the description section or in the video itself. Yeah, we should ban all those people who are just uploading music which is not theirs, I don't think we should even allow covers of songs. 'cause that's just pointless, show off your talents on YouTube, not here. But that means the family members and the friends must be users of our site, right? We can just better have a password protection to pages too. I guess the PDF conversion PHP script is pretty easy and almost already available, we get a kinda lame one when we install XAMPP. And the internet has loads of them anyways. Yeah, using a Wiki is looking useless right now with all the decisions made over the progression of the topic. Yeah, from the scratch totally according to us without following any guidelines of edition. And we'll have to use Perl to edit the Wiki system I guess, so it'd be better off hand coding one of our own. Yeah, people would be busy writing their own and viewing of people they would like to know more about, or just as a random need for some boredom killing. And yeah, people will realize soon that why people aren't reading their bios due to their ugly CSS editing. So they might as well start realizing it. Others have mentioned this already, but just to make it clear, NO we will not give them PHP. Probably just HTML and CSS.I don't even know why people thought about PHP here. HTML and some CSS, not everything. I guess we should set the divs ready and only customization should be allowed, plus addition of custom divs within a given parent div. Not at all. This is a bio site and you should have as much freedom to YOUR info as you want. As long as you dont use it to host your stuff and then not write anything then your free to go. even if you were to make every last word hidden to the public, but you actually write stuff go ahead. We would still want you there!Yeah, exactly, make the stuff only visible to your family, friends or leave it public. As long as you are using the service efficiently without breaking as-of-yet-unwritten rules, you can use the site with full freedom. As for the name, I still have HAP in my mind, the one you suggested, Human Autobiography Project, but the domain hap.com is already taken. BioPress kinda sounds something like it, I guess? BioPedia sounds like a encyclopedia having autobiographies, so not information on various things, but various common people who might not get a Wikipedia page made for themselves. Currently I just have these in my mind, I'll think of more soon enough. And help, I would like to help with HTML, CSS and half the graphics or all of 'em if you want me to. I know this is not much but this will be done by me so you guys can concentrate more on the more important stuff like PHP and everything else. If we ever have a blog or a forum for our site, I would like to maintain that.

Yeah, Racism is not an instinct, agreed with you over that! Well, here again the Church is messing with the Society 'cause according to them everything should be in control of a God, indirectly in control of their fascism I would say. The way religion is controlling some parts of the world and the society seems pathetic to me. And if a God-fearing Theist has to answer your questions, he'll most probably give you that old barber example or just say they are paying for their sins, religion is so self-contradictory, heaven and hell, free will, all of 'em.

When I meant movies, I didn't mean it in the way you think I did. 'cause if I would've done then my impression would be all the high school kids think about 24x7 are labels and that one little thing keeping the human race from extinction, and that I can get beaten up and killed in the most unusual spots possible and no one would probably do anything and that the police are just utterly useless. Americans are spoiled. I never had this notion, everyone, every country, every culture has good and bad points. Doesn't mean I was pointing at something. And Anarchy is so not about riots and burnings.

I am guessing we've all had a relevant idea in our minds somewhere down the line. It sounds good on paper and it might as well be good in real life but the people are just not ready to do something like this, or even read this according to me. But the problems you've mentioned and uncountable ones most of us here would find out need to over-looked right here and right now.And it's basically based on the hypothesis that Science will be able to do certain things just with research. Nature has some restrictions my friend. Solar energy cannot be converted into water unless some alien stuff is present in the plant. And experimenting with it would kill the plants. We don't want all of them to die off on us just at one instant leaving us with no food for years, do we? We have to alter things in nature, which is I think a really bad idea. And maybe Science never reaches that level till we're "ready" for this as a population and world system.

Thanks for those links Imtay! Would look them up, they sound interesting!

Okay, his book "The Satanic Verses" portrayed Prophet Muhammad in an unacceptable way. This enraged Muslims as Prophet Muhammad is like one step below Allah (their God) for them and they couldn't take in the dis-respect. There was one fatwa against Sir Salman Rushdie too, he hid underground at that time. And now when he's being awarded with a Knighthood, Muslims are saying that this is to disrespect their religion even more as awarding a person worth execution is like fueling his works. A guy who insulted their Prophet doesn't deserve the Knighthood and the Queen did this just to insult their religion. Now what I am trying to say is how hypocritical some extremist Muslims are. They never care while spewing words on the lines of things Zakir Naik says, they never care how much it hurts other people, from different countries, different religions, people who actually lost their loved ones in the terrorist attacks. He is trying to say that killing of innocent people is justified? And the same people get so enraged at just one bloody book that they would want a person executed, is their religion so weak? That it needs to kill people to defend it?!? Is Allah so weak he needs mortals who'll go to hell anyway executed to gain the respect for him? And I mean extremist Muslims are so sensitive, even a bloody book and just another English award irks them so much which actually shouldn't matter to them at all! And this is not the first time that extremists Muslims have portrayed their insecurity! It's like they want their religion to be crowned as the best and everyone to respect while they can disrespect anything and anyone. They want extremist terror to dominate the world and we shouldn't have any personal opinions on other people as they decide who should live and who should be executed. I've got some Muslim friends and they have absolutely no problem with this book or this knighthood, 'cause it simply can't affect someone or make any difference. Extremist Muslims just need a bloody spark and they can create armageddon's. The protests in Pakistan and Iran are according to me pointless. Sir Salam deserves it and he will get it no matter how many fatwas would be ever raised. Extremists won't control our perception of things.

Sir Salman Rushdie is being awarded the British Knighthood and this has enraged Muslims all around the world especially Iran and Pakistan. 'cause they think it's an insult as his book "The Satanic Verses" portrayed Prophet Muhammad in an unacceptable way. After the declaration of his knighthood, Sir Salam is pretty thrilled by this, but this is not the same for some Muslims. Iran's and Pakistan's foreign ministries think that this act is provocative and a straight attack at the integrity of Islam. There have been several street protests for now and people are saying that if something not-so-good happens the Queen is to be held responsible. SOURCE Yeah ... right. Okay so Sir Salman Rushdie was the author of the novel The Satanic Verses published in 1988 which outraged many Muslims for a very silly reason. Or a reason I definitely find silly. It portrayed Prophet Muhammad in a way which no Muslim could take in. Fine. He'll go to hell for writing the 'Satanic Verses' first of all, but then why do so many Muslims are having a knot in the underpants over his knighthood? The knighthood was obviously given as he is a creative author and for his contribution towards English literature, not 'cause they wanted to hurt Muslims. The book might not even have been thought over while awarding him with the knighthood. Is Allah so helpless that he needs mere mortals to have fatwas against another mortal to defend himself? I know he is definitely not but the Muslims who are against Rushdie are simply making it look like this. I am so, so, so sick of these super-sensitive Muslims that get enraged at the slightest of all things but people like Zakir Naik and likes don't even care to think twice before saying things such as, "If Osama Bin Laden is terrorizing the enemies of Islam, I am with him. If he is terrorizing America, the biggest terrorist, then I am with him." - Doesn't this enrage people from other religions who are getting killed for no reason at all? Won't this hurt the hundreds of people who lost their close ones in the 9/11 terrorist attack? But just another novel sporting freedom of speech and another silly English award enrages you to the extent of declaring fatwas, having protests and spewing Islamofascist comments? Queen should be held responsible for what? Another portrayal of insecurity of some extremist Muslims? How hypocritic some of them are? Or how extremists of one religion are trying to have their domination on the way the world thinks about someone or something? Oh and of course he should be killed for insulting the Prophet, Islam is a religion of peace as it is. [no offense, it's not directed in general, it's directed towards all those super-sensitive Muslims and especially the ones who support Terrorism]

I agree it should be discussed but definitely not in this way. I being an Atheist welcome healthy discussions but I can't help but blow up when all the person against me says, "in your heart you know I am right and you are wrong", all my heart actually says at that moment is, "let this idiot die"! They seem their "knowledge" of his existence is proof enough ... that's just dumb according to me. The debates here made me realize that a healthy discussion is possible on this topic. And I guess you're drawing the conclusion of Atheism being a religion 'cause it too requires belief and nothing can be proved, but that's just like taking one factor of religion. Atheism is not something we follow or anything of that sort. It's just non-belief in super-natural things. Yeah, exactly. And this one guy didn't know what a "scientific theory" meant first of all, he somehow (it was funny) proved the Theory of Evolution wrong and then said that hence Creationist Theory is right, and I was like "wtf?!?"! You can't say Creationist Theory is right just by somehow in a really funny way proving Theory of Evolution is wrong! You need to prove both the theories at one time and prove that one is right and the other is wrong, proving one wrong, wait he didn't even prove it wrong, does not prove the other one as correct! And it's kinda funny when people ask us for proof of non-existence of God. I mean no one has ever given the proof of existence of God, whatever "belief" and "knowledge" is there certainly doesn't satisfy us to believe so that's the reason we are skeptics, for their lack of proof and our own observations mainly. It's not 2 different sides of an argument both trying to prove their point. It's just one side not believing in what the other states due to lack of satisfying evidence. You can't prove "lack of evidence" when we have people saying "in your heart you know I am right and you are wrong". I personally don't take being a Theist as a religion. I've seen Theists without a religion too, and it's completely okay for a person to be spiritual and not religious. There are some who believe in God as a "force" or "hope" that keeps them driven too! But yeah I agree that on that grounds Theism can be proved as not being a religion.

I am totally sick of Theists who just say "in your heart you know I am right and you are wrong" and/or ask those same old lame questions and I am sick of Atheists who just don't know what they are speaking against, feel proud and act arrogant and so ignorant, most of them I've seen just don't know why are they even taking this stance and some don't even care, they just want to be one as they feel then they'll be considered better off! Some just say, "Believe in God, half the world lives in darkness anyways." which is equivalent to, "Don't believe in God, half the world lives in darkness anyways.". I just don't get it why is community/forum spam like this is even considered bloody debating. If there is no point to be proven and all you're going to do is whine and rant then better not call it a debate and just fight like kids over this. A Theist will say God exists and an Atheist will say God doesn't exist. They both forget that I have my own brain to think and I can myself land up on conclusions and I don't need someone to tell me what's right and what's wrong when it comes to someone's existence!