hollow 0 Report post Posted November 24, 2008 How would boys argue with this.. I'm boy too. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
truefusion 3 Report post Posted November 24, 2008 How would boys argue with this. One could probably argue that it was just as evil to even attempt to come up with something that merely looks complex just to try and prove that men are more evil, rather than equally evil, than women and making it public as the final result of the math problem, therefore making women increase in evil appearance, bringing things back to equality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quatrux 4 Report post Posted November 24, 2008 I think I've read something like that some time ago, there are really a lot of similar formulas, which are really funny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xpress 0 Report post Posted November 24, 2008 (edited) Hmmm...funny. As a boy I need to defend boys. So, I am making a new theory based on your proof. Your proof is based on men's proof that "girls are evil". So, as per some men girls=Evil. You substituted this to money, time and sex and finally proved men=(Evil)^3. So, girls replaced money, time and sex. Which means basically men are good and smart and they do their own work. But girls are coming into their lives, replacing everything and finally make men Evil. Only girls are making men evil. So girls are much more evil than boys........ Edited November 24, 2008 by xpress (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rvalkass 5 Report post Posted November 24, 2008 If Girls = Evil then Men = (Girls)^3, so guys are way better than girls!Also, if we define Evil as 0.5 then Girls are way more evil than Guys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aspiration 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2008 OMG, that is AWESOME!! At first, I was looking at that and I was like, MATH?!?! I am outta here.... Then, "sex and girls" caught my eye.(not in a nasty way). Whoever created this theory, IS TRULY A MATHMATICIAN!! I need to show that to my friend!! Evil x Evil x Evil is Evil^3. xDD. I predict that a girl did this. If a boy created one, the outcomes can be anything. Girls = (I don?t wanna know?). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aspiration 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2008 One could probably argue that it was just as evil to even attempt to come up with something that merely looks complex just to try and prove that men are more evil, rather than equally evil, than women and making it public as the final result of the math problem, therefore making women increase in evil appearance, bringing things back to equality.I wouldn't argue. These are just fun formulas and they are nothing to be making a big debate about.....Just laugh about it. MAny people stereotype boys and girls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hollow 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2008 OMG, that is AWESOME!! At first, I was looking at that and I was like, MATH?!?! I am outta here.... Then, "sex and girls" caught my eye.(not in a nasty way). Whoever created this theory, IS TRULY A MATHMATICIAN!! I need to show that to my friend!! Evil x Evil x Evil is Evil^3. xDD. I predict that a girl did this. If a boy created one, the outcomes can be anything. Girls = (I don't wanna know).We can't predict who made this theory, since boys can play with this thing too. I made this topic just to share with everyone for fun only. Just to make fun with the other topic that -lovesun- made in his post on Proof that girls are evils.And I'm also a man.I wouldn't argue. These are just fun formulas and they are nothing to be making a big debate about.....Just laugh about it. MAny people stereotype boys and girls.I agree with your idea. Nothing to make a big debate. As I said for funny purpose only.And @express, you just can't make another proof or calculation.. You're making a reason rather than making a logical like the one I post here.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xpress 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2008 And @express, you just can't make another proof or calculation.. You're making a reason rather than making a logical like the one I post here..Yes....Thats why I called it theory rather than any proof or something else Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted December 10, 2008 the whole thing is rendered useless, cause the first statement of the prior proof says Women require time and money -> women = time * money"and" = "+" so it would be women=time+money, which ruins the proof. -reply by anon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iGuest 3 Report post Posted March 6, 2009 on the part were you said money * money * women *sex = man just don't sound right b/c we all know men= women*sex women = time + money also don't use girls in the equation it make you sound sick! Keywords: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
