snlildude87

Haha, awesome. You can link it back to the thread of sig of the week #6, too...for more proof.

My bad guys. I can't read, so I ended up putting down Michael as the winner for Sig of the Week #6. Anyway, the real winner is truefusion. Here is your tab: [IMG]http://img316.imageshack.us/img316/91/minibanner2bu.gif[/IMG] I hope you don't mind, but I cut off the Xisto part because your name is too long. And if you're interested, here is the sig that helped him win:

Try this code: <?phpHeader("Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0");Header("Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT");Header("Pragma: no-cache");Header("Content-Type: image/gif");srand((double)microtime()*1000000);$randnum = rand(0,3);if($randnum == 0){readfile("http://img398.imageshack.us/img398/8074/siggymoody2copy7ff.jpg");}else if($randnum == 1){readfile("http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/7831/siggymoody3copy7rm.jpg");}else if($randnum == 2){readfile("http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/6484/moodysig9pd.gif");}else if($randnum == 3){readfile("http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/9291/moodysig23bl.png");}?>

I'll enter this one:

CLOSED!WINNER: truefusion

Saint_Michael: snlildude87: Avalon:

Here, you can talk about the entries for the sig of the week #8. Keep it clean.

Here, you can entry sigs for Sig of the Week #8 (Friday September 23, 2005 to Friday September 30, 2005).Here are the rules: THIS WEEK'S RULES:Sig size min: 175x75max: 400x150Brushing: abstractText: Must have at least your name.Render: ANYTheme: ANYEntry due date: Entries will be closed for voting on Friday September 30th.Since last week didn't get as many entries, I'm going back to all entries. Have fun!

Hmm, I don't think you need that border. A 2 pixel stroke is more than enough. That background has no depth at all. It looks like 1 layer of brushing, slapped a scaled render on, type some text and stylize it. You need to work on the little things that will make the sig look good such as blending. Try not to have a blank space in your sigs. Also, don't do outer glow. It just kills the sig.

I like it. Try blending the render on the right in a bit. The only thing I'd change is the text. Turn off anti-aliasing so that it will look more crisp.

Site works for me, too...Try using a different browser.

Background style and color don't match the render's style and color. Render looks pixelated, and it's a bit too bright. Random sig rotator tutorial: http://forums.xisto.com/topic/24925-how-to-make-a-sig-rotator-for-people-with-multiple-sigs/

Clear cache and cookies? Maybe that helps....

Hmm...maybe it's your ISP...For cpanel, try logging in with another browser. That's the only suggestion I can give you because I really have no idea what's going on. Mine works fine....

Check out what I came across today: http://www.utorrent.com/intl/en/ It's called ľTorrent, and like the name, the download is ridiculously small: 82KB. BitTorrent is a file sharing network that's designed to off-load bandwidth if you're sharing large files like Linux ISOs. What it does is it allows peers to share a bit of the file, so that each person is holding a small piece. Then, it grabs all the pieces from the peers online and downloads them all to your computer. I may not have gotten this process correctly, so correct me if I'm wrong.

Yep. And if you ever come across an acronym and want to know what it stands for, go here: http://www.acronymfinder.com/ Here's IMHO at acronymfinder: http://www.acronymfinder.com/

Yeah, definately download new brushes and tutorials. Once you have that, your sig quality should somewhat improve. The new one is better than the first one because the background color matches the render's color. I don't like how the background is busy like that though. The text is all right, but try to make it lighter. You also need a border on that. Look for strawberrie's border tutorial.

OpaQue has answered the questions, so I'm closing this thread.

Hmm, looks good, but the layout that they give doesn't look as professional as WordPress.Nice find though.

Question answered -> thread closed.

It looks good for a first sig. Nice background, too. The problem with this one is that nothing matches. The background and font are abstract while the render is tech. If you want to make this one better, I suggest blending in the render just a bit, making it lighter, and changing the text to something NOT old english.

You're not talking about me when you said "some moderator", right? Anyway, I know what you mean. Usually, I will contact that member to remove some stuff in the signature space, but none has bothered me recently. What really gets me is that some members used to have huge sigs that took up half my monitor. If someone's sig is bothering you, PM me, and I'll make them remove it.

The first one is monochromatic. There is also a blank spot. Try filling that up with something so that it wouldn't look bare.For the second one, don't put scanlines over the entire thing. Looks really bad. This one is also monochromatic.Third one is the best because it's not monochromatic like the others. Looks like a photo manip.For all of them, put a border on, and you should be set.

You were probably suspended because OpaQue found some posts that you copied. I warned you once. You have to use the quote tags whenever you copy from other sources. Anyway, you now have 7 hosting credits. Try getting it up to 10 and waiting for a few days for the credit script to loop and unsuspend you.

Yep. Question has been answered, so I'm closing this thread.