Jump to content
xisto Community

gaea

Members
  • Content Count

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About gaea

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.highimpactart.org

Profile Information

  • Location
    Vermont or Boston (USA)
  1. If it worked without a private key in filezilla then it should work fine in dreamweaver. That warning *should* happen the first time you connect -- but only that once (it's to stop people from spoofing the server). Make sure you save the key when it prompts you. Hope that helps.
  2. Thank you for your feed back rvalkass.The page now validates, and I've switched as many things over to divs as possible (Joomla still includes some tables...but that's beyond my control). The code should be *exceedingly* easy to follow now.Any further suggestions? Those two were most helpful.
  3. I've had the following happen to me twice within the past few days:I struggle with a problem for three or four hours. Eventually I give in and post asking for help. While I wait for the help I continue working on the problem. An hour or two down the road I figure out the issue on my own. As such, I no longer need the topic I created. I'd like to delete it so as not to waste people's time (and clutter up the sub forum), but I don't have the privileges to do so.Being able to delete your own topics would allow users to self moderate, and cut down on the amount of useless stuff. If you are worried about useful answers getting deleted you could make it so a user could only delete a topic if no one else had replied to it.Just a thought. I feel bad about wasting people's time for something I could clean up myself given the chance.
  4. I am trying to use javascript to include a stylesheet depending on the user's resolution. The HTML <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; <?php echo _ISO; ?>" /> <?php if ($my->id) { initEditor(); } ?> <?php mosShowHead(); ?> <noscript><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="highimpactart.org/templates/_HighImpactArt_/1024/1024.css&%2334; /></noscript> <script type="text/javascript"> if (screen.width>=1050) { document.write('<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="highimpactart.org/templates/_HighImpactArt_/1280/1280.css&%2334; />'); } </script> </head> I'm running into two problems. 1) The script doesn't seem to be writing anything. Fixed 2) The <noscript> tags cause all sorts of validation errors. From what I've read it seems as though the <noscript> tag is not allowed within the <head> section -- is this correct? Could the same thing be accomplished just putting the default stylesheet above the javascript? The 1280 stylesheet has the same exact classes as the 1024 stylesheet, so would that over ride it? 3) The Validator doesn't like the fact that I have a "link" element inside the javascript code. Any suggestions about how to fix it? Evidently xhtml doesn't play nice with javascript by default. You need to add in two extra lines. Ie: <script type="text/javascript">/*<![CDATA[*/ YourJavaScriptCodeHere/*]]>*/</script> Thank you for your time.
  5. Didn't realize that you had left a comment before I nuked my post. As you rightly pointed out, I needed to use block level elements instead. I had come to the same conclusion about an hour earlier, but I certainly appreciate your help. Now I've *almost* gotten everything right. Just one more bug and I should be good. For somereason the 1024 layout is incorrectly displaying one of the images. So close and yet so far away. http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/
  6. Figured out my problem (didn't know you can't assign absolute values to inline elements). Mods please delete this when you get the chance.Thanks.
  7. Cool. Would someone mind moving my other post into the Website Showcase forum now? I'd delete it and remake it, but I don't think I have permissions to do that. The thread is located at: http://forums.xisto.com/topic/57539-feedback-on-webdesign-political-art-video-gallery/ I haven't received any feedback on the design as of yet, and am hoping having it placed in the correct area might help Thanks.
  8. hah you're on top of the posts. Yeah i just edited the original one to say basically the equivalent. The math questions are fun. Remind me of highschool. I'm in art school now, so not much use for algebra.
  9. heh, if I wasn't already hosted I'd grab up all the programming related ones.And I see you're trying to be tricky by using 1 instead of -1 in number 3
  10. Hello everyone, After a few months of work my new sitedesign is up. The page is mostly just a showcase for some Political Art I've been doing. I'm pretty excited about my new design. Although it isn't as "professional" as some of the other work i've done in the past, I wanted something more personal and artistic. Any feedback/criticism/comments you have would be much appreciated. -- Paolo Unger Dvorchik P.S. The artwork itself is still being updated, so don't worry about discussing that quite yet (unless you can't hold yourself back ;P). I'll ask for critiques on it in a few months when things are more cohesive.
  11. Will do electriic ink. Thanks for looking into it.
  12. I concur! Statcounter is free, fully configurable, and has the most options out of any counter service I've seen to date.
  13. Hello everyone,I used to use Xisto a lot back in the day, but have since switched over to Xisto - Web Hosting due to my lack of free time. I wanteded to drop by and post my new website design so I could get some feedback on it. However the site won't allow me to post in that catagory, presumably because I am not "Level 1." I am a premium member, and have made 193 quality posts to date. Do you think I'm really at risk of spamming things? ^_^The real error I get is "Sorry, you do not have permission to start a topic in this forum." That being said, i've posted in this catagory in the past, and so am assuming it has to do with the fact that "This forum is now strictly monitored. This section is reserved for Member Level 1 or higher. This is to prevent unwanted spam advertisement by just passing bystanders. Thank you."Any assistance would be much appreciated.Thanks,~Paolo
  14. Happy to help. 1) The answer to this, in most cases, is not significantly. Roughly 60% of women report no side effects at all, and the vast majority of those who do have only minor issues. That being said, the real answer depends on the individual and the medication. As previously mentioned Ortho tri-cyclen Lo has the lowest chance of side effects (meaning that weight gain is mostly unheard of). It's also worth mentioning that the pill may increase a woman's breast size...which may or may not be a good thing depending on your taste 2) These medications are still very very new. As such, they should still be considered research drugs. While scientists may have a good idea of the short-term side effects, they've yet to conduct any studies dealing with prolonged exposure. Meaning that there is definitely a possibility that taking it for years may cause medical problems including infertility or other medical complications. Simply put, I personally definitely would not risk it. Then again, I'm positive that I'm going want to have kids in another ten years or so.
  15. 1) That depends on what pill you get, your insurance, and the current market price (oddly enough). Assuming you have medical insurance it shouldn't be more than $10-20 per month. If you really can't swing that you can always goto a planned parenthood and get them for free/donation. 2) The morning after pill shouldn't really be used as a contraceptive. It's more of a "oh %&^# I shouldn't have done that last night!" sort of thing. There are many different pills out there, what's best differs from person to person. Therefore, it's best to discuss it with a doctor. From my personal experience Ortho tri-cyclen Lo seems to be the most popular. Mostly because it has the smallest chance of side-effects. 3) If used correctly (i.e. taken every day) there is only a 0.1% chance of failure. That's the best protection, excluding abstaining or a vasectomy, that you're going to get. If the pill is used improperly then the failure rate goes up to 5%. For the past five years every woman I've been with has been on the pill. No problems yet. *keeps his fingers crossed*
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.