ongnoai

Jeez! Great topic FlaKes. Didn't know the Canadians had gone that far of late, but it's fine with me. What confuses me is the link made between hypothetical ET's and the bush administration. To my knowledge, if the Americans have some kind of savvy weapons adapted to situations where they could be used against aliens, it didn't come overnight right under bush's thumb. Should this Canadian statement be acurate, it must have been stemming out of a long-range armament program of sorts. That means previous administrations must have also been involved in developping these weapons and that it has been kept hidden from public knowledge, right? There's a lot of money involved there, should it be true.I've got a sneaky feelin' all this money must come from somewhere. When raking my memories, I seem to remember that some educated finance guy out there said something about an astronomical US$ 11,000 billion dollars deficit for FY 2004. No kidding man. Can get to trace his site back if you wish. All the same, it'd feel good to shakes hands with ET

Hi Plenoptic, I'm not sure I can have an educated opinion about what you say aove, but I'm fairly sure that spoiling the taxpayer's money is a most common disease worldwide. The same holds obviously for donated funds. Sigh... Good luck with that topic. I'm going to put a tab on it, just in case.

Well, aeroblack, judging by the way Sadam's trial was again postponed, with two of his attorneys killed of late, I feel rested this communiqu? describes perfectly how things are going to last, i.e. nowhere.In my layman's views, this is a lot of words to say next to nothing, but I haven't gone through the fine print.

Mmmhhh, I wonder if there would have been a case if the girl had happened to be an ugly freak. Let's see: I'm not sure I would object to sharing the boy's emotional distress, and a guy has got to get a first try at it, if you ask me. Self-righteously, I hurry to add this sex thing has gone too far these days and we've got to put a stop to it. Naughty girl should definitely be forbidden to be on the lookout for innocent boys.

Real sharp job kashvet. I say well done. Cheers

Anybody around ignoring that Sadam's trial starts up again this very day ? It really does, but I hardly think that it will make the matter any clearer. Maybe glimpses, but there have been so many lies in this story...Well, since the boys are not yet to come back at the moment, I suggest we wait a bit and see if some of the items detailed in this topic prove acurate with this trial. Future will tell the truth, or hopefully part of it, more surely than anybody of us.

Mmmhhh, makes one wonder wether people would be so gullible if such a hoax were to be contrived for ethanol. That's the chemical name of drinkable alcohol. Judging by what used to happen during Prohibition back in the 1920's, most people would think twice over what the name really means.

Arnel, as serverph said above, the thing is to be built at Cadarache, south-east France. This is expected to be a research project, so you shouldn't benefit direct results before years.

I side up with OpaQue. Seems to me this topic is close to an old fantasy among students, same as patients daydreaming and boasting to have sex with nurses in a hospital, just to keep their minds (and other places) busy. Anyway, seems to me I can't recall any of my teacher being good-looking enough to dream up intercourse with her.

Well, a big welcome to you, young teacher. I just hope that getting totalwar from openwar will keep this site peaceful enough . You'll sure meet an interesting and supportive lot right here. Brace yourself and keep up their pace. Be seing you, time and places.

Hey, Saint-Michael, seems to me the right time to stumble on the block and quote some Brit writer who said enigmatically "If God didn't exist, there would be no atheists..." Makes sense, right ?

Lol, Beware Ryo, this could be even worse if it happened in real life instead of an interrupted dream. Also, kid brothers were meant to mess up big brothers' business. I know. I used to be kid brother myself.

Now, this is quite unfair to do things like that behind somebody else's back. Without knowing your parents, I'd still say they are lagging in communications. How about waiting the next time they are out and get them on phone to tell 'em you just sold 'em to a horse trader ?

Lol, Jesse, even if this comment is a bit outdated, I got a notion that you're not the boring type of girl. Things kinda MOVE around ya. Don't see what I can say to help, 'cept good luck. And CHEER UP.

Welcome here nascarmama. I hope you get to enjoy discussing things this way or another, despite your reluctance to go forums. They have quite a lot of amusing and interesting (i.e. supportive) fellows around. Say hello to your cats on my behalf.

And how would you say that in Sindarin ? Right you are, I dunno Cheers

God, feels great to read one's mother's tongue at times. Thanks, friend. Now, in German : Ich liebe dich. All i's are pronounced like in the word "gift". Simply make the ch's like a soft sh in English, that means don't put a virtual "t" before saying it, In Italian : Ti amo In Spanish : Te quiero In Russian : Ia tie lioubliou. the word "tie" is to be pronounced like you would in English t-a. Only English, far as I know, has that uncanny habit of changing vowels values at random. Other civilized languages, except at times French, don't do it. Chao tam bięt Anh

Now, now St-Michael, I fully support jlhaslip's comments. I personally tend to think that "when it's not the whole stuff, it's not the *darned* stuff at all". If you're a healthy, normal human male, you'll be able in a short while to turn back and say to yourself you've been done a favor. Most girls are muck quicker than us to realize that something's amiss in a relation, starting with themselves at times. Now, talking about their ways of severing bonds is another matter entirely. Remember! When it's not the whole stuff, it's not the stuff at all.

Say, I do wonder why you guys are so busy discussing about something which is of the order of the most intimate feelings like it were a capability shared by (almost) everyone like seeing or hearing.Lightning bolts are not for everybody to experience. It's totally circumstancial, and I think it happens at random. The person who'd have laughed about it the moment before can be stricken the second after. It can't be shared, is all. Like getting caught by a lightning bolt in a storm. One gets it, the guy next door won't. Period. Hold the fort and brace yourself, friends, in case that would happen to YOU

Cain, it may appear somewhat silly, and I'm not sorry for that, mind you but I can't bring myself to believing in political dynasties. I'm still one of those who admire what Ole' Abe said in his Gettysburg address, you know, that old-fashioned "government of the people, by the people, for the people" type-thing. Whatever, the future will tell it all. And, yes, I was for Kerry if it means I have to abide by the voters' decision without being particularly happy about it. And, no, I don't think I'm insulting the Kerry candidate, because he proved to be a man knowing quite well the alleys of power and much less the blind alleys of day-to-day life in this country. Reason why I was for Kerry is I thought he'd learn, is all. Nonetheless, you are to the point in quoting some polls about other presidents' popularity. I kinda dislike these things, because I think a REAL states(wo)man HAS to take the risk of going against the general opinion sometimes for the good of all. So far as it doesn't give me the feeling of being cheated, it's quite all right with me to have a (wo)man willing to steer the thing without requiring to be popular for it. Have a good WE all

Hey! Congratulations for opening your site, Jesse.

Hey, strikes me that most of you might not have seen any of Santa Barbara or Dynasty or whatever. THAT was real bore, and that's when the whole *darned" thing began. I say never get along any TV program that proposes to decerebrate people, and keep control of your thinking processes.

See here, it takes 2 people to establish a relationship, right? Should one of these 2 fail to agree to a relation, then there ain't such a thing as a relation, Ok? Most of us end up discovering that having being dumped at least one time has been a favor done to us. What if YOU had discovered belatedly that she wasn't the right girl for you? You'd have been in a much more difficult situation not knowing how or not willing to admit that you had to dump the gf, what? Chin up, boy. There are so many beautiful lassies around, just waiting for the right guy to come up, and think one of them will be the right girl for you.

Are you annoyed by seeing bras only? As a hetero male, I must confess it doesn't revulse me, although I hardly approve of it. No, I'm more shocked by a number of TV ads intended to use sex on women in a more devious and subtle way. Ever seen a woman mimicking an orgasm whenever she eats a chocolate bar or when she smells at a silly hair spray or whatever. You can even see respectable grannies getting their share of faked orgasms every now and then, especially when XMas time comes up, come to think of it. Now, it seems to me all this has to do with a kind of vicious attempt to demean the woman's image, even to her own eyes. I'll bet that most women don't realize they're strongly encouraged to take some ersatz of sexual pleasure without using the appropriate, natural tool to do so, or that somebody tries to make a fool of 'em by suggesting their smelling sense (undisputably more developped than men's) should guide their buying of idiotic, polluting and meaningless cleaning products. There, I also grabbed this opportunity to vent out my own anger.

Yeah, right, folks.Now, has it occured to anybody that, as far as sexual matters are concerned, males regularly tend to boast and overdo it, and females resort to some "smoothing up" of sorts which I would be reluctant to openly call cheating.That reminds me of that silly poll I once saw in which you could get convinced that actives males were 2/3 to declare deceiving their mate, while on the women side they were a mere 1/3 to say the same thing. Its squarely impossible from a statistical viewpoint, buddies, take my word for it.On my side, the answer is : just be wary of these figures. There ain't any problem of maturity or behavior. Only a slight matter of cheating coming with sex hormones.