chinfo

Coldfusion is a server-side scripting environment like PHP, Perl/CGI, etc, and is associated with Macromedia as Visual Basic and ASP are to Microsoft. It's specifically tailored for dynamic webpages especially for e-commerce.

The one thing that I think Coldfusion isn't popular to webmasters it the lack of support from most mainstream webhosts. I mean you have to signup for some special deals before they give you Cf support, with additional charge at that. Also, Coldfusion is harldy existent among free webhosts, and that stymies the desire to learn the language.But I agree its great for dynamic and interactive sites.

Prevention is better than cure, so try to back-up your valuable data As for your question, there's lots out there, depending on the exact problem. If you just want to restore your PC into an earlier configuration, then Norton GoBack 3.0 is one option. In WinXP, you can do this easily without having to buy extra programs.If you just want to recover data, recovery softwares like MagicRecovery and DiskmasterPro are good.

Actually the question should be the other way around: what does dreamweaver mx 2004 have over UltraDev. Well, for starters it has better interface and more intuitive features. But mostly it has to do with enhanced database integration in MX that sets it apart. Add to that, MX was retooled to support almost every web programming language you could imagine (PHP, ASP, .NET, Java/Javascript etc.)In addition, dreamweaver MX is better suited for group work than earlier versions because of its integration with other Macromedia products (which is after all the concept behind Studio MX 2004).

"Xisto" in itself has little meaning to me. Only when you dissect the two components will it make an impression.It sounds devious because of the word "trap," which of course means to catch somebody or something unawares. "17" might connote something minor, since it's not 18 What exactly does it mean?

Yep, my high-end rig is a P4 on an ASUS and I haven't had a problem since I bought it more than a year ago. But to give ur PC a leg up get as much memory as you can specially if your using it for intensive programs.

Intel still leads in terms of technology, but AMD is catching up pretty fast. But for a performance-to-price ratio, AMD is marginally better.

I agree with Shackman; one component of a PC depends on another. As for AMD chips, I wouldn't recommend them if you do high-end work that depends on CPU power, then Pentium 4 is a must. But for common business apps and simple graphics loads, AMD chips are more than adequate for these.

Wow! You still play pac-man! You're ancient! You play it on the computer or on a game console??? Still have the MS-DOS version of the game, even Its a classic, it may not be cool but it is fun.

3d max is marginally cheaper I woudn't call myself experienced in max yet, but i'm slowly getting the hang of the proggie.

These are what I used for the following jobs:For bitmaps - Photoshop 7/CS, sometimes Fireworks MXgif animations - Animation Studio (part of Paint Shop Pro)For vectors - Illustrator CS, AutoCAD 2004, hopefully Flash MX 20043d stuff - 3d studio max, perhaps Maya 6 in the future

Dreamweaver MX, no more, no less

Intel and ASUS!

I run an WinXP machine, as well as a MacOS X for my graphics work (which I would never trust in any windows machine). But how I wish there would be a MacOS for PC. BTW, have any of you guys ever tried Lindows by Linspire, that hybrid Windos within a Linux kernel?

I use Photoshop more often, though I do Fireworks stuff once in a while just to keep myself familiar with it. Though I find Paint Shop Pro's Animation Studio better for animated GIFs than ImageReady.For vectors, Illustrator and AutoCAD are my preferences depending on the work. I'm still learning Flash's nuts and bolts so it may come to a time that it'll replace these two.

My favorite shooter so far is Medal of Honor (and its expansion packs), very realistic and totally engaging. But for RPGs, nothing beats Neverwinter in scope of content and the level of graphics and animation.But I'm still playing Pac-man though

MS IE is my mainstay, but because of its security issues I've been using Mozilla more often now. It has great features and options, like an integrated ad-blocker for ugly pop-ups (which microsoft refuses to put into IE) and a downloads accelerator as well. Totally great!

Dreamweaver is the best web-editor there is both as WYSIWYG or plain text, especialy coz it's platform independent. Frontpage adds about 160% more code, most of them totally useless and proprietary and sloppily done that it would only work properly in microsoft browsers and OS.Graphics-wise, Adobe GoLive CS is more robust coz of the integration with Photoshop and Illustrator.