Chesso 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2006 Well, there is a difference between stealing and using the same ideas. I mean if I saw and like the Fast Reply feature on this forum and implemented my own into my forums would I be stealing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orenji_jaro 0 Report post Posted October 10, 2006 ou!! im usign windows vista and hell its much sleeker than windowx xp.. windowx xp is just 3d..but vista is liek 4x 3d ^^its much betetr if you use vista on LCD's than monitors ^^you cna also customize the looks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesso 0 Report post Posted October 10, 2006 Anything else besides how it looks lol.I could program a shell replacement to crap on Explorer...... so that use of Vista is not all that usefull (plus there's programs already available for it). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alegis 0 Report post Posted October 10, 2006 How much difference will be between these two windows .May be little or very much .What I think personally is there will be difference but it will be not that much as between windows 98 and xp .What are ur views about it.  This is not an 'opinion' issue. Or morale issue. You want to see the difference in features? LOOK IT UP. They are too many for me to sum up, and lists and reviews exist. Try, for example Paul's site http://winsupersite.com/  He has a lot of experience with winsows testing and there are comparison guides. This is just a bit silly to debate.  And it certainly isn't "too early to decide". Atm following every build (5744 atm) and I absolutely love it versa XP - I wouldn't want to go back.  main difference is that one's more bulkier than the other.  You're not doing the linux community any favor by acting ignorant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bad-and-ugly 0 Report post Posted October 10, 2006 Oh, God, I hate when a new version of Windows comes out... I hope I can stick to this for a long time. I still used Win98 in 2004! And when I moved to WinXP, my webcam no longer worked! '=/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pencilpoint 0 Report post Posted October 13, 2006 I would say that probably Vista is better......Windows XP is pretty buggy in the first place, and I really hope Vista is an improvement to XP. I certainly like the visual styles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesso 0 Report post Posted October 14, 2006 I'm waiting for the day when they finally build something that's more optimised instead of security enhancements and bloating......Or fix some of the old problems instead of completely replacing the framework essh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
g2konline 0 Report post Posted October 14, 2006 Well Mocrosoft isnt really going to give people much choice after a while it will stop selling XP, and as people are almost always buying 64 bit now on new PCs there wont be much point for them getting the 32 bit XP or worse the 64 bit XP. And microsoft will also eventually stop the updates for XP and its will force many corporate and government customers to switch as it has done with XP and SP2.Also Vista is still in the early betas its not possible to tell what its going to be like exactly alot of software changes drasticaly after beta testing is completed. And the security features are hardly likely to be worse than XP at worst they will be equal and since most users tolerate the security for XP its not going to be its biggest issue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xboxrulz1405241485 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2006 actually, they just released the last RC before they ship one last test version before releasing it to the general public.I think due to the new license changes, I don't think a lot of people would upgrade. Even better, I don't think people would continue use Microsoft Windows. It's expensive and the new End User License Agreement (EULA) will backstab a lot of people and businesses.xboxrulz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
