gameratheart 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2008 (edited) I was only recently made aware of the release of Firefox 3, having not been notified by Firefox, and problems with my internet connection that caused Xisto and similar websites to slow to snails-pace, so I ended up missing the download day and haven't got it yet.The thing is though, I've been hearing a lot of negative press about it. I know that there was concern that Firefox would break Flash support a while ago, which was fixed, and I hear it's kind of restrictive as to downloading addons and junk.Now, I did actually test Firefox 3 Beta 5, and my only real complaints were with the theme and that stupid address bar. But the thing is, I'm very comfortable with Firefox 2 and don't wanna upgrade if it's going to break stuff or add features that I'd rather do without. So, I'd like to hear from current or previous Firefox 3 users about their expirience with the new browser, and give their opinions as to whether they'd reccomend getting it. That way I think we'd have a balanced argument where the winning side would soon become obvious.So, what do you think? Is Firefox 3 really "all that"? Edited June 20, 2008 by gameratheart (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
truefusion 3 Report post Posted June 20, 2008 I'm currently waiting for Ubuntu to update Firefox 3 in their repository, 'cause i don't want to change paths. I've just been running Ff3b5 and the only thing i don't like about it is the address bar—it doesn't show your history of typed-in URLs in the drop down, it shows bookmarks set for the address bar. Other than that, upgrading doesn't bother me; i don't need to bloat my Firefox with extensions, a few is all i need. For everything else i use Opera. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AbdurahmanL 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2008 Oh yeah, firefox 3 is faster, more responsive, better looking, doesn't crash like my old one did. But I didn't try the betas so i switched directly from firefox 2 to firefox 3. I'm lovin it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Forbez 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2008 Firefox 3 owns you, owns Firefox 2, owns Internet Explorer, owns everything! It is domination in the form of a browser. Nothing else compares, it's truly that brilliant.But mind you, they stole a lot from Opera though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfpack 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 I was only recently made aware of the release of Firefox 3, having not been notified by Firefox, and problems with my internet connection that caused Xisto and similar websites to slow to snails-pace, so I ended up missing the download day and haven't got it yet.The thing is though, I've been hearing a lot of negative press about it. I know that there was concern that Firefox would break Flash support a while ago, which was fixed, and I hear it's kind of restrictive as to downloading addons and junk.Now, I did actually test Firefox 3 Beta 5, and my only real complaints were with the theme and that stupid address bar. But the thing is, I'm very comfortable with Firefox 2 and don't wanna upgrade if it's going to break stuff or add features that I'd rather do without. So, I'd like to hear from current or previous Firefox 3 users about their expirience with the new browser, and give their opinions as to whether they'd reccomend getting it. That way I think we'd have a balanced argument where the winning side would soon become obvious.So, what do you think? Is Firefox 3 really "all that"? Firefox 3 is beyond amazing, it kicks Firefox 2's sorry little *bottom*. The awesome bar is really awesome and nothing less, I hadn't tested the release candidates but the final version really left me with my mouth open. It uses less memory and the javascript is way faster, but it has some stability problems specially when connections are lost, sometimes it freezes some seconds and sometimes it just plain crashes. It now renders Acid 2 properly so that's a plus.Basically, you can't see most of the innovations, but I'm really glad they're supporting more and more the new CSS standards.I just don't like that most of my plugins are not compatible, but I guess that will get fixed as time goes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint_Michael 3 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 firefox 3 has its pros and cons, some people didn't like the way the nav bar is now and how it is incorporated with the bookmarks. Of course, I think it is a lot better because now you just type a copy of words in and it auto searches the bookmarks or sites you been to. The biggest thing that everyone likes is the memory that doesn't get sucked up by Firefox and everyone likes that. Of course if your a plug in nut, you have to wait for plug ins to get updated, a good chunk of them been updated during the beta's and updates been popping up left and right since Tuesday. As for the reason you didn't get a notice through ff2 because they are two different browsers, strange as that may seem, and so you would have to had installed one of the beta's to get those updates and what not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vardigon 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 (edited) The response times in Firefox 3 are indeed much faster. You might want to wait a while though, as a lot of the plugins haven't caught up with the release of FF3. It's brand-spanking-new. The page load times are quite good. FF3 uses 6.8% of 1 GB of RAM on my computer. (You do the math.) I had to get the source out of the testing repository as it hasn't been added to the stable branch yet :/.Of course, the fastest browser is elinks. xD Edited June 21, 2008 by Vardigon (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ivantoar 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 It's definitely worth upgrading. Faster, more reliable, doesn't crash like FireFox 2. Since I got it in 18 June, I haven't experienced any crash even a little with FireFox 3. But the most hurting is not all plugin compatible with FireFox 3, and some note as my older brother complains, smart tag makes people can know about porn page he had opened (as description of the page used as tag). LOL! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carson 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 I think it is worth upgrading to firefox 3. To the normal user there isn't a heck of a lot of difference. There are a couple of new noticeable features, but nothing that couldn't be done with plugins anyway. The most noticeable thing for me was my website in Firefox 3. Before the upgrade my drop-down menus were laggy and wouldn't animate properly(I think this was due to them being designed for IE because they worked perfectly in it). In Firefox 3 they work perfectly. I'm sure there are a lot of other behind the scenes features as well. I'm still getting the same old freezing up problem though. If I minimize FF after a while of browsing, it freezes when attempting to restore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gameratheart 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 Looks like most of you are pretty one-sided as to where you stand with it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Janissary 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 (edited) Im a firefox fanboy and a regular user. I mean I dont know things like memory leak or crashes but hotmail service has issues with FireFox3. Im lovin'it Edited June 21, 2008 by Janissary (see edit history) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
truefusion 3 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 Looks like most of you are pretty one-sided as to where you stand with it...Were you expecting a story that had more than one side? You asked if it is worth upgrading—this is a yes or no question. In the end, you're the one that's going to decide that for yourself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serverph 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 for my experience with FF3, so far so good. no freezes, no lags, no apparent problems. and out of 20 extensions i use, 15 are working... a big thanks to their developers of course for bringing their updates in sync with the FF3 release. of the remaining 5, i should wait for an update, or if not replace them with a similar tool soon enough (i'm sure there are better alternatives out there, which i haven't checked in a long time). a huge difference with FF2.xx is speed and memory use of course. but if that is not a "selling point" for you to upgrade, then just stick with the old version. Hidden FF3 easter egg: about:robots Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint_Michael 3 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 Well out of 76 extensions 23 are not working:lol:. However, I do have a interesting problem with Firefox 3 and that is it doesn't fully close on me for some reason, I have to go into task manager to close it fully, and for some reason I keep having problems loading Xisto as well . Other then that no real other "Major" Problems myself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
i_speel_good 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 It works pretty well. Many add-ons ('read it later', 'greasemonkey') have been updated with Firefox 3 combatibility. My father installed Firefox 3 in the computer while I was away to come back and find Firefox 2 without any cookies, passwords, bookmarks, addons, search engines. That's a heavy bug, installing a version when another is already there. I had to remake/reinstall everything. Thankfully I had an old backup of my bookmarks.So remember, before upgrading to Firefox 3, backup your bookmarks (Bookmarks>Organize Bookmarks and export it as html or backup as json) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites