Jump to content
xisto Community
Johnny

New Sigs [by Johnny] Three of them.

Recommended Posts

Hm...I'm sure you guys have noticed, because I've been using them as my sigs, just never posted them. Three new sigs.

 

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

 

Rate/comment/criticize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice use of Apophysis in the first two, though perhaps it could have been manipulated a bit more :D (I've seen some sigs where you would never guess Apophysis made the render, coz it's been manip'd so much), but definitely nice renders anyway :D3rd one is quite good, though it is particuarly blue B). Text could have been done better (ie blended, better use of grungy font), but it's not too bad. Background works, though I've seen better ones from you Johnny :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well well well......sig 1-not bad nice and fluid would have just used one set of squares with the J in it 9/10sig 2- the depth looks sweet except for the top left corner thats an eye sore, its makes the depth look flat 8/10sig 3- sorry the brushing got you this time, especially right under the render don't tell me you were trying to blend the render like dued i should slap you on that ver thought j/k and the text looks a little pixelated. 7/10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st is the best, but you need to take those blocks off, left and right bottom corner. Then you have yourself a nice sig. #2 seems like a radial blur with a couple effects, and nothin else.#3. Not a fan of this one too much. too much blue and not enough depth.Good job on #'s 1&2, work on 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid new skin doesn't let me multiquote...glad I'm an admin at the moment.

 

And jeez, nobody likes the mechanized heart one? I love that one dude.

 

1. Nice use of Apophysis in the first two, though perhaps it could have been manipulated a bit more B) (I've seen some sigs where you would never guess Apophysis made the render, coz it's been manip'd so much), but definitely nice renders anyway :(

 

2. 3rd one is quite good, though it is particuarly blue :(. Text could have been done better (ie blended, better use of grungy font), but it's not too bad. Background works, though I've seen better ones from you Johnny B)

169287[/snapback]


1. Meh. The only manipping I do to my fractals is brightness/contrast, levels, curves, colors, that kinda stuff.

 

2. *cry* Yeah...I didn't wanna blend it. B) And I'm getting bored with the same old grungy style.

 

well well well......

 

3. sig 1-not bad nice and fluid would have just used one set of squares with the J in it  9/10

 

4. sig 2- the depth looks sweet except for the top left corner thats an eye sore, its makes the depth look flat  8/10

 

5. sig 3- sorry the brushing got you this time, especially right under the render don't tell me you were trying to blend the render like dued i should slap you on that ver thought j/k and the text looks a little pixelated.  7/10

169341[/snapback]


3. Nice to know. :D

 

4. You're an eye sore. :D

 

5. I didn't get a word of that, but it sounded like you're trying to sound smart.

 

6. 1st is the best, but you need to take those blocks off, left and right bottom corner. Then you have yourself a nice sig.

 

7. #2 seems like a radial blur with a couple effects, and nothin else.

 

8. #3. Not a fan of this one too much. too much blue and not enough depth.

 

Good job on #'s 1&2, work on 3.

169347[/snapback]


6. No, then I have a nice fractal. B)

 

7. It's not a radial blur at all... it's part of this fractal: http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/

 

8. But blue has sex appeal!

 

Yes, I know...I always give sorry excuses when people don't like my work. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah It's not that I don't like them, just trying to give good criticism to help you out, from one designer to another :D

169424[/snapback]

I understand. Let's manhug. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sig 1: Nice little vortex of light you have there. Kill the corner blocks and you're set.Sig 2: Another vortex of light. :DSig 3: I have blue. Besides, I already gave you my comments in the rate the sig above you thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*cry* Whenever I add anything to the fractal for a sig, it looks fugly. But it's just so plain without it!

169620[/snapback]

Maybe fractals are not supposed to be used with renders and such. Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe fractals are not supposed to be used with renders and such. Just a thought.

169988[/snapback]


The fractals are the renders. O.o

 

Nice sigs i like # 3 10/10

170026[/snapback]


Thanks. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats where abstract brushing comes into play with fractals, you can do alot with abstract brushing and the right grunge brush to get the right depth in sigs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats where abstract brushing comes into play with fractals, you can do alot with abstract brushing and the right grunge brush to get the right depth in sigs.

170442[/snapback]

Hush mike, hush.

 

You're partially right, but it wouldn't work on these two fractals, as they're vortex-style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're partially right, but it wouldn't work on these two fractals, as they're vortex-style.

170552[/snapback]

Well, since you can't use character renders in fractals...hows about stop making them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.