FreedomOverdose

Hi, I was wondering if there is or isn't a certain TOS for Xisto free hosting packaged. For example, can we host porn, or link to it. Can we host warez, or link to it. Things like that. Anyone that could help me? Thanks in advance!

Well, I did the debate last year, and this year we have many more other debates to do. What I want is some simple reviews, so we could improve our future debates

haha..i used to play tarzan at my pc when i was like 12 years old..and i still remember those times when i got stuck in that level "journey at the treehouse" or something like that..at the part when passing the wooden bridge..haha i remember i fell many times there..and so..i got angry and uninstalled the game many times...but in the end it was easy like a piece of cake..my problem with the game was that i had to play it minimized..the computer would restart itself for full-screen programs

(i havent read previous posts, so i apologize if i repeat smth already said..cheers)bible is fake..its just some fairytale, some knowledge based on lies, and now that CERN will give us the results....religions will start to fall, one by one,religious people and those who believe in such "god" and "heaven"..are starting to get afraid and see what happens..they start to hack into CERN computers.for my opinion, i think that proves they are starting to see the truth...that "god" does NOT exists...BUT...my personal opinion about spirits is: the spirit of a man that dies..gets directly transferred at a very fast speed...inside someone's body which is being born, in the same frame of the second with the one that is about to diei know it sounds like a bit weird..but i also think that this "spirit" i am talking about...you MIGHT have seen it when someone is in his last seconds..sometimes the body gets shivered...but im not that sure of thisanyways...cheers..keep up the good work to the staff

i would like to start by mentioning if you guys have already checked my opinions for death, afterlife, and such stuff.as you might have read my previous posts in these section, you will understand what am i trying to say to the world. there is no life after death...anywaysas for the topic: NO, im not afraid of dying, im only afraid that i might be forgotten after my death. Will people remind me? and im not afraid of dying, im just afraid that i wont go in England and meet my darling. thats all what im afraid of. i will accept death as it will come to me (sorry for bad english ). Everything has its end, jusst like world was created, in that way it will be deastroyed someday, and there's nothing you can do about it. thats my opinion about death and being dead. so there's nothing to be afraid of.

looks very nice, as i said before. But, it autoupdates , and it needs more add-ons. anyway, it needs some time, and I think we should all give it . Cheers everyone!

How did the physical Universe come to be?Many Scientists at present support the Big Bang hypothesisThis is that an initially extremely hot, dense, and undifferentiated universe, which may have existed since the beginning of eternity underwent an explosive episode... and so on.Let's call this the moot point.There are actually quite a few alternatives:One alternative is 'Dynamic Equilibrium', a variation on the steady state idea. ... It didn't 'come to be' it's what was always there.Or please do suggest other ideas ......(BTW: You are allowed to be humourous if you want.)

These are the theses of the karl-popper debate me and my team made a year ago. Please rate them as it is important to us . Thank you!

If you can choose one from this list what will it be?Invincibility-No sickness, never get hurt.Invisibility-Cant see you! You have a switch to turn on or offPower-A lot of it as in the lifting, punching, type of power.Unlimited Girl Friends-yea.....Speed-Faster, way faster....Wisdom- become very smart all overA bigger willy- i dont need that.A Rapidshare Premium for 10 years.Kamehame haaaa- energy rays from hand..What did you choose?Share why you chose that answer.

Courtesy of wikipidea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed-circuit_television My debate I have recently seen alot of CCTV'S been put up in my area of where I live. From what I know yes, crime and theft and stabbing has increased from the time which I have lived in the area, but my question is; since the CCTV's have been put up, there hasn't been any reports confirming that there has been less crime/theft and so on but instead it has taken most people's privacy when in their own house's because some CCTV's on a block of flats which maybe pointing in a direction that it face's the people's flats and can be easily motorised elsewhere such as the streets. I wanted to see if anyone else agrees with me that the goverment are taken people's tax's and are wasting it on system that may not help. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say that CCTV's are a bad thing, but the money that has been invested to be put up and controlled by operators is useless in my opinion.

i do a lot of stuff when i have spare time...i don't have a lot of spare time >_< especially now that school started. They've been giving homework since the first day and i've been busy. AnywayMy primary past time is reading. I love reading detective books and crime ones, especially at night before sleeping lol. I'm also into mystery ones. Angels and demons being my favourite one (i read it twice)I also am addicted to certain songs that i listen to almost every time i'm not working. Especially I don't love you by MCR. My parents say it's getting annoying but not for me though . Music never seems to get boring for me.Another thing i used to do whenever i had free time was call my cousins on the phone and have hours and hours of endless conversations and laughters. But now i have to find another past time since they're going abroad. I'll try calling some friends lolI also play with my ps2, ds and miniclip games on my pc.

You're right ppl. I totally messed it up and really loled when I read it!! What I meant is that I am AGAINST creationism. Anyway, since I paused writing and got to eat dinner, I made the topic a total mess. Forgive me . ps: i don't think it is right for me to edit my topic now

Do you think violent video games affect our children's actions and personality? Personal Statement: Pro: ▪ Alternation for our children to escape from the boring everyday life. ▪ FUN and boost children interest in computers. ▪ Communication with people from other countries. Contra: ▪ Children could learn how to do atrocity and could think that this is normal and harmless like its displayed in several violent games. ▪ Boosting the increase of violent cogitations. ▪ Waste of money (?) ▪ Possible alienation and addiction to computer games. I personally think that children should be allowed to play such games as long as they dont sympathize with the thought of preparing or doing a violent action. If a child attracts attention of other people by talking publically about afflicting other people, the child should be watched closely and a counseling session should be considered. A lot of people say such games arent good as they contain so much blood. Listen up... I personally played many shooters like Counter Strike Source for hours and didnt even notice that blood was turned on. If you play the shooter and enjoy it you dont even notice the blood, thats a negligibility. I dont think children become violent because of computer-games. Everyday we see movies containing a lot of violence, they are all over the channels. Who cares? Nobody, indeed. Children watch them, even comics contain violence. What did happen? Nothing, did somebody ever accuse the TV? No, i cant remember off that. But for sure the evil game development companies are responsible. Pfft... Please take time to write your statement and explain why you are thinking that way.

and many more other species are dying for making leather cover for our cars :|

well i mistakenly saw that movie...but i liked it a lot in the end.the effects were nice and i just couldn't stop laughing at the jaw of the monster at the begining and the way he spoke to angelina.it was really very funny.i also think it deserves better reviews

i really liked it and i think their voices made it so interesting...well it gets boring sometimes but all in all it is worth it.i liked very much when one of them was singing the pussycat doll's song...it was awesome.i still laugh when i remember it

i usually drink huge amounts of water daily.i think no taste is the best taste and you really understand how good it is when you really need it.no drink invented by man can be compared to water simple pure and very very healthy.i think we should find some way to drink more water because more and more people are so busy that they even forget to drink water!

well it has always been known that water is the best medicine for most diseases.I have tried drinking that much in the morning but i had to go to scholl in 30 min so i couldn't eat breakfast and it was rather boring the need to go every now and then to the toilet :(Anyway i think i will start this again

I'd like to add to this as I just saw something on the news last night that I think would relate to this topic I created. I do believe there are more "stupid" people in the World, but I also think it has much to do with attention. Ever since Youtube and Myspace videos have made it big it's seemed like more and more kids do ridiculous things for the attention that comes with it all.Back to what I saw on the news last night. I'm not sure where it happened but it was on a school bus and a teenage girl started a fight with the bus driver and started swinging at her and then the bus driver's daughter (also riding the bus) jumped on top of the girl and started attacking her. The first girl (who started the fight with the bus driver) claimed the bus driver hit her first, not knowing that the bus had a camera on it.The parents of the first girl tried to press charges against the bus driver because of what the daughter said, but the charges were dismissed because of the camera footage. The daughter of the bus driver was also charged and was put in anger management for a year. Now first girl has been expelled and is facing assault charges. Now the wonderful Media, being as crooked as they are, are siding with the girl and trying to get all of the charges dismissed on account that she is a minor.In my opinion that's freaking bull. These kids do the things they do because they think they can get away with it and the sad part is most of them do. They get the attention they want and they get away with the crap they do and when other kids see that they think they can do the same thing. Notice from jlhaslip: Debatable whether this should be in the Debate section. More like a Vent to me.But others may decide to Debate this issue. I don't. I agree 100% that there are Darwin Award Winners amongst us.

I think you didn't understand me well. Of course that animal testing is vital, but not for cosmetics products for god's sake!!!!

I wish to discuss this concept. I know it's pretty high level and it breaks everything down to basis, but if I manage to get my point across in this thread and therefore get some intelligent replies, it will be worth it.Therefore, let me get to the point:Right or wrong.So, from day 1, as children, we're taught to do what's right, and we're taught what's wrong. Crossing the road when the light is green is right. Not cheating in an exam is right. Respecting everyone is right.Doing drugs is wrong, smoking is wrong(this is a stigma that is attached to smoking), malpractice and plagiarism is wrong.The thing is, who decided all this? I always wondered to myself every now and then. Who defined that this is right and this is wrong? Who decided that what we are taught to do and what we are told is right, is right? And vice versa, what we do is wrong, is wrong, period?Why I'm being very general about this is because I'm looking for some reasons to what people think about the basis of right and wrong. I believe, generally, that right or wrong is a bias - in other words, if you say, for example, that not cheating in an exam is right, you are biased about it - it is RIGHT and that is FINAL, no questions asked.This is a particular maxim that is drilled into many people's heads from the time they grow up. As with doing things that are wrong, for example, murder or extortion, or drug dealing. These are WRONG, final. Who decided all this, or what decided all this, and why is it justified and universally accepted?I want everyone to understand that the purpose of this topic is only to question, and I am not using it as a method to support the "wrong" things that are done - I just want to figure out what everyone thinks about this "bias" of right or wrong, since effectively, you're taking a side when you decide what you're doing is right or wrong, and bias isn't a very good thing usually....The reason why I bring out this topic is also to introduce the concept of logical decisions - whether "right" or "wrong", what is the most "effective" course of action Share your thoughts, I look forward to seeing some intelligent replies. I'm sure I won't be disappointed, believe me, I need some answers to the questions I ask myself.

I thought I should make this debate a bit more different: If you are for animal testing post in blue If you are against animal testing, post in red Context: For many centuries people have experimented on animals. There are two main reasons for doing this: first, to find out more about the animals themselves, and, secondly, to test substances and procedures to see if they are harmful (with a view to deciding whether or not they can be used on human beings). In the second category fall cosmetic products as well as medicines and surgical techniques. There is a growing consensus that it is not acceptable to test cosmetic products on animals. This debate is about whether we should experiment on animals for scientific and medical purposes. The debate about the pros and cons of animal experimentation (or 'vivisection') is one that elicits very strong emotions: animal rights activists have resorted to trespass, violence, death threats, and hunger strikes in their single-minded (and sometimes illegal) mission to end this practice. I don't think that it should be ok to test products on animals. Animals don't get a choice, whereas humans do. Humans can get paid to do it if they want to as well. Animals go blind, some go through severe pain and it would be torture for them. A lot of experiments are tested on animals like rats and mice, rats and mice are nothing like humans! So how do we know that it will have the same effect on people? I think this is not acceptable and it should be stopped. What are your thoughts?

I'm totally against gay-ness. Srsly, that's not even a solution. If so, how would they be able to make kids? How could the society improve?? But, please, let's not go offtopic

This topic causes many "angry" reactions, believe me. Please let's be cool before debating.I think that it should be legal and should be dealt with responsibly. This does not mean having an orgy with all of your wives. It also does not mean that you can give more attention (money and emotional input&output) in one wife and leave the rest. If this is the case, it should not be done. If a man can not have more then one wife because of his financial status, he should not do it as well. In fact, in some religion(s) and cultures it is prohibited if a man does not have thisThere was a point made that unless it is not a 14 year old girl with a 50 year old man. If a girl reaches maturity by getting her period for the first time, she should be eligible for marriage. However if this is not the case (the woman not being mature and the man is), it is pedophilia. This is in certain cultures and religion(s). However, in the common justice system one is an adult and mature enough at the age of 18. Then she become a 'woman' (sort to speak of). Only then she should be eligible for marriage. This is the case now in most 'modern' country's.As you can see I am constantly referring from a man's perspective. It is not because I am discriminating woman. It is not because I think they are b****** when they have multiple men. It is not because I think the man is superior over the woman. I will explain in a few paragraphs to you why it is better that men should have more wife if it is possible for him and if he is willing to.Studies have shown that there are more woman on the world then men. For everybody to have a partner, this would mean that there will be a lot of woman who do not have a man. If a woman wants a relation with a man, this would mean that the woman are 'forced' to engage a relation with a man, who already has a woman. That or become lesbian and have a relation with someone who can substitute the man. Or (a women greatest nightmare) let the husband cheat his wife by letting him engage in a relationship known as adultery. The woman can be 'pimped' and used as a prostitute if she does not have a partner to take care of. She can be abused to do abnormal things. This does not mean that everyone without a man is doing such things. It means that everyone who has no one to look after her, someone is going to take advantage of her, we live in a cruel world. Then how do you explain the prostitutes and people who have someone (like a husband) to look after her, engaging in such activities? It's simple, they chose for it. No one is engaging in such activities if she has a care husband who takes care of her, who loves her and is willing to do almost everything for her. If she has a father or mother or any other person who can look after her, then she should not fall in such a circuit.Now back to "why the man only?". The man only because there are less man to begin with. And studies have shown that man have such an attitude against woman that they prefer to have more then one partner. So it is basically more lenient towards man, because it (polygamy) respects the social attitude from a man. A woman does not want to have his man lurking around in bars and committing adultery with everyone who passes him. Yet in this legal system, the man is not allowed to marry more then one woman, but have more then thousands and thousands of people who he commits adultery with! Surely a woman wants a man who respect her, instead of having a man who claims to be respecting her but having sex with someone else. The best of humankind is he who respects his wife the most.To create a perfect society, where there would be no alcohol abuse, no gamble abuse, no woman abuse, no [insert abuses left over], everyone needs a partner. However, there is a flaw in this plan. If there are married couples everywhere, why do they have such problems? It is simple, we (a nation) should work together. But for this 'perfect' nation, we need something which will feed us. You know, some people have an empty feeling inside of them. They keep on wondering what it is, and they try all sort of things. Yoga, smoking, weed, exercising, getting drunk, eating, and a lot of other things. Unless the people are fed, they are not going to act complete. It may sound very vague but with complete I mean "life is perfect". When you have acquired this, and truly have this, (because a lot of people claimed to have found happiness but it is a lie - love makes blind for example) you will be a very influential person. And when you are this influential person, a lot want to be like that. Because they too want to be happy in their life. And this go on and on. Imagine that everyone will have this, a perfect society. A lot of woman are literally left over. They have no husband. What to do? It is simple, let them marry another man. A man who can take care of her and respect her and treats her with such love, that she too will feel perfect. This is the goal of polygamy (in certain cultures and religions.)The fact that a lot of people misuse this certain understanding about polygamy, and people look denigrating towards it, is not astonishing at all for me. I too would not find it moral to have more then one wife, if I heard this stories about people having 60 wives and such. It is not moral. I am living in a culture which is based on a certain religion where it is possible to have up to 4 wives.I know only two man who have more then one wife. I never coped with it before. This man takes care of his wife, and does his utmost best to take care of the other. Having two houses for both wives. And he lives in a third one. While he pays everything for the children (by giving financial support to the mothers). And being respectful towards the woman. It was strange for me because I always thought (and forgive me, I was a child who had wild imaginations) that when having more then one wife, you get to get one bed, and a big orgy. But in my religion it is not even permitted. Shocked as I was (not really..) I began to know that it's not so bad after all.Note: Polygamy is not bigamy.Yeah well so to conclude my post, polygamy is ok, but with certain rules to do so. If one could not abide for this rules, he should not do it. The fact I do not conclude with saying that woman should do it too, (having multiple man) is explained above. It should be legal because we live in a nation where it is legal to marry one girl but to commit adultery with a lot more! I do not call this respect towards woman. I call it respectful when you say to another woman; "I love you, but I love this person too, may I marry her?" So yes it should be legal.Sorry if I made mistakes or hurt anyone with this, it was not my intention to do so.p.sI do not want to have more then one wife..I think that one may cause enough headache :)

This is what I think about this topic. It may seem as a strange answer, anyway. I think that neither pure communism nor pure FME is desirable.. Both do bring advantages but the disadvantages far outweight it. The best economic system is therefore the mixed economy ; The government can act as a watchdog to regulate the activities of the private sector and will have as aim to maximise social welfare. The private sector on the other hand will bring in economic efficiency owing to the profit motive aim. It is therefore a truism that the mixed economy is the best economic system in a modern world . Anyway, it's not that easy, since you can't draw a simple line on how far the gov should access the market. Anyway, I think that time will show it. What do you ppl think?