Jump to content
xisto Community

possible123

Members
  • Content Count

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by possible123

  1. Well, Opera is fast. There have been many tests conducted that I have failed to bookmark that show that Opera is one of the fastest browsers. You say you hate Firefox?It looks like you need some extensions or themes. Opera is built for advanced users right out of the box.Firefox is built for simple folk, but you can make it more powerful with extensions, and make it lookbetter with themes.Personally, I use Firefox. Partly because I heard of Firefox before I heard of Opera, and because of the extensions.The extensions are what make Firefox. I understand that Opera 9 has widgets, but those are more for "fun".Firefox's extensions are more for functionality. To sum it all up:Opera is fast and for advanced users right out of the boxFirefox for simple folk but extensions can make it extremely powerful.Opera is the fastest, but you should give Firefox a second chance, your feelings mayturn around after you get an extension or two.
  2. Personally, I would use both if I had the access. I always double-check any fact that looks dubious on Google. However, in many cases, vandalism in Wikipedia can be reverted in minutes, even in a few seconds if a regular Wikipedian happened to come on a page that had just been vandalized. The fast vandalism reversal is the reason that Google trusts Wikipedia so much, I think. However, sometimes Wikipedia can have too much information. If I need some simple info, I sometimes find a huge Wikipedia article. To me, Google is the ultimate source. You can look on several websites to fact-check quickly. Actually, now that I am done with my post, I don't really think that I am talking about the same thing. To sum it all up, use what works better for you. Google works best for me, and I think that Google can beat both Encarta and Wikipedia on some subjects.
  3. Hmm... I think that greed is the best way to take over the world. Everybody wants something.A rich person could fuel the greed of others. That rich person could then make huge promisesto the greedy people. When the rich person fails to make those promises come true, he or shewill blame it on another nation. The greedy people will wage war against that nation. Both the greedypeople and the blamed people will become weak from war. Now, the rich person has the opportunityto take over both the greedy people and the blamed nation.The real trick here is to make people think that they will get something good, and somebody or somethingis preventing them from getting it. Those people will fight to get that good thing, even though it may not exist.The person attempting this should be careful. Taking over the world could affect it in a positive or negative way.A negative way may erase human civilization. After all, we live in an age where atomic bombs exist.Some other tips would be to use cold reading when talking to the greedy people. Search on google if youdon't know what it is. It is basically a technique that makes you look like a fortune teller, even thoughyou may know nothing about the person you are talking to.Also, it is easier to take over a country based on its shape. A country like Chile is very long and thin and has many islands.It would take longer to get any military forces through all that compared to a country like Poland, which is a smalland circular landlocked country.Taking over a country gives you access to its resources, which enable you to take over more difficult countries.Beware that it would be difficult to keep your grip on the country because somebody else could take it away fromyou just as easily as you took it away.Just some thoughts.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.