Taupe

Both are proprietary OS.So no way for me.

A dynamic page is a page which is generated by the server each time a user ask for it. (For example, PHP pages are dynamic)A static file is the contrary (for instance, HTML documents)

Yes, bjnr is right : IE doesn't support XHTML.

You might want to have a look to this script.

I haven't got benchmarks to answer your questions, but you have to know that ASP is a proprietary language, plateform-specific, hardly compatible with webstandards, and which development has been stopped...

hmm do you think you can write it for me?

A static file ?Or a dynamic ? And in which language ?

Just goto your control panel and add/remove windows components.  Then install the thing called IIS.  After that, you just download php's windows installer and everything is done for you.

With all bugs and security holes of IIS, I recommand you to use a real webserver instead (like Apache).

I want to install PHP. For this I have downloaded Apache Server. But I am not able to configure it.

What are the errors ?

I think something went wrong, because RSS 0.93 is very different from RSS 1.0 (in fact, RSS 0.92 is a early version of rss 2.0)

I don't know if anyone has already answered this problem (i'm too lazy to read through 6 pages of replies) but in thunderbird you can't access the about:config like in firefox. So that means it might not be as customizable (is that a word?) than other clients.

47402[/snapback]

 

Just use About:config extension

GNU/Linux is perfect for a home PC. I use it for 2 years and a half.
There are many distribs (like Ubuntu, Mepis) which are more easy to install than every Windows
No need to know UNIX command for a long time....

Could any Linux users recommend me some first-person shooters built for Linux? I only had partial sucess running Half-Life under WINE.

You should try Enemy Territory

isnt rss 2.0 good enough

No : RSS 2.0 is called in the RSS world "the RSS tag soup".

It isn't in RDF (so can't be used by semantic web agents), it doesn't support namespaces (so can't be extended), it has different specs with contradictions between them (and nothing to choose what to use)..

It's really the worst choice.

You didn't understand the subject : those are not email clients....

I don't see why all small/mid size companies and individuals would ever buy MS again.

You're right : that's why more and more compagnies and administrations drop M$ Office and use instead OOo.OOo format will be the official format in Europe.

Read this tutorial (there is just a small error : you must write rdf:li instead of li because this element is part of the RDF namespace)

Yes : opening many distrurbing popups, moving around youre screen. something really awfull http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/404.png

i m goona try phoenix

Phoenix is the old name of Firefox...

You should provide a reall RSS feed (that is a RSS 1.0 one)

About Microsoft... People have been complaining for years and not until sp2 did they actually put a pop-up blocker in ie... Pretty sad.

A buggy popup blocker. Check by yourself...

Yes, it must be an external software...

I can't understand how people still use the deprecated IE with all its security holes...

Is it a crash or juste a closing ?(If it's a crash, the talkback program will sent the stack to developers, and if you can reproduce it you can open a bug)

Firefox fails with some types of popups. Our ad network, Realtechmedia started serving popups within the banners by mistake and all of them were successfully delievered :-S

Have you got a test case ?I'm sure that with a well-configured browser, the popups won't be delievered...

IE doesnt support <blink>, for example, it also renders a lot of CSS incorrectly. But it is by far the best browser for Javascript etc.

Are you kidding ? http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/404.png

Mozilla's support of javascript is much more better than IE's one !

It may have gotten further in some places, but it has horrible bugs in others. As far as I have been able to find out at least.

 

Quirksmode.org lists quite a lot of DOM bugs for Explorer for Mac where Explorer for Windows doesn't have errors. It also has a host of CSS problems, as you can see with a quick google.

Yes IE/Mac has bugs that IE/win has not, but there are much more bugs of IE/win that aren't with IE/Mac.

All web developers know that tasman engine is far better than trident.

If you want tables of comparaison, look at this one for example...

One could add that IE/Mac support PNG, whereas IE/win can't render alpha-transparency...

Search a bit more on google with tasman trident standards...

oh well, Anyways, Firefox is much better than Mozilla, becuase, for one thing, it's currenltythe newest verion of the browser that the mozilla team is releasing, this means that the coding and other features are most up-to-date than the other ones.

You're absolutly wrong : Mozilla Firefox 1.0 is more than 6 months behind Mozilla 1.8a6.

The 1.8 branch adds many new features and improvements (like speed). The 1.7 branch (used by Mozilla Firefox 1.0) is really old...