Taupe

Both are proprietary OS.So no way for me.

A dynamic page is a page which is generated by the server each time a user ask for it. (For example, PHP pages are dynamic)A static file is the contrary (for instance, HTML documents)

Yes, bjnr is right : IE doesn't support XHTML. You might want to have a look to this script.

I haven't got benchmarks to answer your questions, but you have to know that ASP is a proprietary language, plateform-specific, hardly compatible with webstandards, and which development has been stopped...

A static file ?Or a dynamic ? And in which language ?

With all bugs and security holes of IIS, I recommand you to use a real webserver instead (like Apache).

What are the errors ?

I think something went wrong, because RSS 0.93 is very different from RSS 1.0 (in fact, RSS 0.92 is a early version of rss 2.0)

Just use About:config extension

GNU/Linux is perfect for a home PC. I use it for 2 years and a half. There are many distribs (like Ubuntu, Mepis) which are more easy to install than every Windows No need to know UNIX command for a long time.... You should try Enemy Territory

No : RSS 2.0 is called in the RSS world "the RSS tag soup". It isn't in RDF (so can't be used by semantic web agents), it doesn't support namespaces (so can't be extended), it has different specs with contradictions between them (and nothing to choose what to use).. It's really the worst choice.

You didn't understand the subject : those are not email clients....

You're right : that's why more and more compagnies and administrations drop M$ Office and use instead OOo.OOo format will be the official format in Europe.

Read this tutorial (there is just a small error : you must write rdf:li instead of li because this element is part of the RDF namespace)

Yes : opening many distrurbing popups, moving around youre screen. something really awfull http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/404.png

Phoenix is the old name of Firefox...

You should provide a reall RSS feed (that is a RSS 1.0 one)

A buggy popup blocker. Check by yourself...

Yes, it must be an external software...

I can't understand how people still use the deprecated IE with all its security holes...

Is it a crash or juste a closing ?(If it's a crash, the talkback program will sent the stack to developers, and if you can reproduce it you can open a bug)

Have you got a test case ?I'm sure that with a well-configured browser, the popups won't be delievered...

Are you kidding ? http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/404.pngMozilla's support of javascript is much more better than IE's one !

Yes IE/Mac has bugs that IE/win has not, but there are much more bugs of IE/win that aren't with IE/Mac.All web developers know that tasman engine is far better than trident. If you want tables of comparaison, look at this one for example... One could add that IE/Mac support PNG, whereas IE/win can't render alpha-transparency... Search a bit more on google with tasman trident standards...

You're absolutly wrong : Mozilla Firefox 1.0 is more than 6 months behind Mozilla 1.8a6.The 1.8 branch adds many new features and improvements (like speed). The 1.7 branch (used by Mozilla Firefox 1.0) is really old...