rantsh 0 Report post Posted September 7, 2005 I have to agree that it looks awesome, but, I might stick to 2D for a while, because not only I don't really have that much computer power right now, but, even if 3D is nicer, 2D might be more efficient to work. Of course that, I can't have a final word until I've actually tried this 3D thing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plot 0 Report post Posted September 8, 2005 no thanks, im quite happy with windows blinds, althought my desktop maybe notbe 3d but its neatly organized and looks really cool in my opinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wutske 0 Report post Posted September 8, 2005 Downloading the movie atm.But, my opinion won't change. Sorry, no, I don't want this stuff, I don't even want any virtual desktop software installed. It's annoying, alway searching where you have left your program, you can't see when something changes, ...If you don't have the space to put a program, get another monitor, even if it's some cheap as thing.When was the time that people were happy with MS-Dos or Win3.1? Just plain and simple, small and fast. ***Saw the video, it looks nice, ok, must admit it, but that's all. Seems kinda useless, this sounds stupid; the thickness of an application. I don't even think it would enhance the speed (time is money) at wich you can work, it's all just gimmicks.But, that's what I think, time will prove whether I'm wrong or not, I'm willing to change my opinion, if I was wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TJ213 0 Report post Posted September 9, 2005 hmm, maybe windows vista will have something better. To transition to 3d will probally require a new way to display and contol your computer's input and output. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
