Jump to content
xisto Community
Sign in to follow this  
Raptrex

Google Sues Froogles

Recommended Posts

Google has sued Froogles.com, charging the rival shopping search engine with trademark infringement.
Mountain View, Calif.-based Google, the No. 1 search engine, filed a 68-page complaint against Froogles.com in the Eastern District Court of New York. The complaint alleges that Froogles.com proprietor Richard Wolfe, a New York state resident, illegally traded on Google's famous name and search brand for profit with a "nearly identical" mark.

"Upon information and belief, the defendant selected the mark Froogles with full knowledge of Google's prior rights in its Google name and mark," according to the filing. "As between the parties, Google is the senior user of marks that incorporate the formative--Oogle for Internet search services."

Google asked the court to shut down its rival and order transfer of the domain name, among other relief.

The case is only the latest legal showdown for Google, whose multibillion-dollar advertising and search business has become a wide target for complaints. The search giant faces several trademark infringement cases of its own, including complaints against its paid-search services in the United States and abroad.
PC secrets

The legal spat with Froogles.com goes back more than a year, when Wolfe filed a petition against approval for Google's trademark, Froogle, which was granted in February 2004. The search giant contends in the filing that its rival has instilled false doubt over Google's legal right to the shopping brand.

The proprietor of Froogles.com registered the Web address in December 2000, according to the filing, but did not use the domain for business until July 2002. Google claims that this was four years after it had secured rights to its Google trademarks. Froogles.com registered for a trademark for e-commerce related marketing services in September 2003.

For its part, Google filed a trademark application for Froogle in November 2002, and was granted the mark in February 2004.


I new this would happen

Notice from snlildude87:
Changed "Froogle" to "Froogles". These are two different companies - Froogle is owned by Google while Froogles is not.

Edited by snlildude87 (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uuhhh... I think froogles.com would be a lame name for a shopping site since the name is copied from google and froogle and froogle is some sort of shopping site too...news.com doesnt sound very good about google

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's actually gd that froogles get sue cause if its not bring down, many ppl will be mistaken and jump to the wrong company...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just went to froogles.com and saw this:Bookmark froogles !

Also went to their forum and saw this:Froogles is in a battle with a Giant. A very large public corporation
claimed that froogles was too similar to their trademark name.
The National Arbitration Forum ruled in favor of froogles.
Link to the decision
Excerpt from the national arbitration forum's three judge panel decision:

"The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to
make it distinguishable from Google's mark," the panel found.
The name Froogles.com "creates an entirely new word and conveys
an entirely singular meaning from the mark."

Although froogles has won the domain name dispute battle, we are
still involved in a trademark dispute at the united states patent and
trademark office. Now the large corporation has filed a case in federal court against froogles.com

Our attorneys are working very hard and continue to work hard on this case.

If you would like to show your support for the little guy, please read
the articles below (or at least one of them) and post a reply to this
message and tell others about this post.

Some of the articles written about froogles.com in regards to our domain name/trademark infringement battle.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-files-suit-against-froogles-for-trademark-infringment/1590/
https://searchenginewatch.com/sew/news/2062299/google-sues-froogles-over-its-name
http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/
http://www.webpronews.com/
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5499354/
http://www.internetnews.com/article.php/3386401
http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/
http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/
http://dunlapcodding.com/phosita/archives/e_trademar.html
http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/
http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.