Jump to content
xisto Community

ihope1405241495

Members
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ihope1405241495

  1. Hmm, we all seem to have exactly different ideas. I think you better choose the 'type' of game you want
  2. Hey, it wasn't like my life depended on being part of the 'team' or anything :DAnd I don't code anything... I just don't. I know how to do it but whenever I try I just end up not doing it :DSo, yeah, there's my idea anyway...Do whatever you want with it.
  3. Geh. Put your reply under the quote. Sometimes things are free because whoever wrote them can't accept cash. I mean, if you sent me a PayPal e-mail I wouldn't know what to do with it.
  4. No, I wasn't being serious. I suppose the encryption algorithm should be provided... just not the key. Right? At least tell us what type of algorithm it was.
  5. http://www.serenescreen.com/ I'll try, maybe... What about the EULA? Whazzit say?
  6. Geh. Looks like Brian was the *only* one who got the question.I thought I was gonna have to do it myself...
  7. |)0|\|+ |=0|2@3+ |_33+:DIsn't W\e = whatever?Nice job, anyway
  8. I've bookmarked us...I'll help with whatever I can. In fact I already have a super-game idea.It'd be a simple game with a 2-d board, but it'd be different in, well, lots of ways...But as a start, we need a solo game in which you can move around on the board.Edit:1) Hmm... it used to be Starship Traders/The Last Resort because of the... well, the 'feel' of the game... as well as the lack of rules :D2) More visual-type stuff. SST/TLR is text-based; I like visual, even if it's ASCII like the Rougelikes (as well as the few rules as TLR)3) See aboveEdit again: I really want a game that combines everything... just put it all in there.
  9. Do you need anything other than a web browser?If so... I can't do it.
  10. Hmm... It contains a link to the following picture: But why did you put your IP address in there? Hehe, ok, ok, sorry, I'll try to.
  11. Ooh boy... this is an RTS? Wow. It looks more like an animated film. You can actally play this? Except I'm, uh, pretty bad at RTS's. Once I decided to go for broke and make a unit. After a while I still had nev
  12. Cool! :DBut I do think the lines need to be reworked somewhat. I think you should simply make them look more like a part of the picture, rather than something laid on top of it.Uhm... (thinky think) This looks like a simply opacity fade. Try... ooh boy, some kind of Multiply. Everybody loves Multiplies.
  13. 30,000 reputation points for Coach! Hmm, I like to call these relative and absolute. *thinks of something else to say* Uh...
  14. Erm, clean and glassy templates for what?I don't think you need a template for nothing.
  15. Quite simply, HTML is for when you want to make your page look a specific way. XML is for storing data in general, and browsers can view it different ways. An example HTML file: <html> <body bgcolor="green"> <b>Hello!<b> </body> </html> This will always display the word Hello! against a dark green background. An XML file doesn't look too much different: <xml> <title>My Hello Page</title> <background color="green" /> <text type="bold">Hello!</text> </xml> Though it's pretty obvious what this should mean, this file can be displayed in different ways. In some programs this would show a blue bar at the top, with the words 'My Hello Page' on it, and below that a box that said 'Hello!' in bold against a green background, and in monospace font. In others you would have the title in the title bar, with the word Hello! in supersampled cursive against a wavy green background pattern. In actuality I just made that up, and most browsers would display it as-is, though Internet Explorer will stupidly and pointlessly display a bar at the top indicating that it has blocked active content. Yeah, that's an active XML file all right. Whew. Ask a question, get a walkthrough. I think HTML is still going, but... ah, I dunno, ask someone else.
  16. I think so. It has a 64 in there, anyway; I hope they wouldn't put that in a 32-bit processor I think it looks mostly the same, but runs somewhat faster because it handles 64 bits at a time instead of 32: it's a 64-bit processor. As well a 32-bit processor supports 4 gigabytes of memory without any 'help'; 64-bit processors support 16 exabytes, i. e. probably more than your computer will ever have. Well, I dunno. Those guys used to think 4 gigabytes was a heck of a lot. My first hard drive had 512 megabytes (?) and now that's standard RAM. Oh, and finally: I think 32-bit applications will need to be emulated, which is... weird, but hey, it'll work until Windows X64 SP2; then it'll be overcome by Kludges. OK, I'm getting off-topic. I'd buy it if I were you.
  17. Whoo, there's plenty wrong with that but I won't bug you about it unless you specifically state you want me to bug you about it. procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender:TObject) Hehe, sorry, I won't do it again...
  18. I believe http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ has a complete (-ish) list of distributions. It's linux.org after all!
  19. In short: your friend is wrong. As someone else said, it looks like your friend decided to look smart by making a coherent yet meaningless sentence out of 'linux', 'kernel', 'bios' and 'screw'. And as for the kernel: imagine your computer is a long strip of land. The kernel would be the North Pole, and there resides the Church of the Keylord. There's a magical tower there, and whenever you press a key it makes the Kernel Kart ride over to a different spot and do something else.
  20. The very *first* thing you'll want to do is find a Linux distribution. These different distributions are, well, greatly different, and they can be as different as XP and Panther. But they all run Linux applications. There are no SuSE apps or Red Hat apps, only Linux. http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ Is that the right URL? Erm, well, there are about a hundred distributions (give or take a hundred), and there's a list right there. I tried SuSE, and I didn't like it... Red Hat seems to be about the most 'famous' distribution but it costs a bit. There are plenty of free distributions out there, though, and many have plenty of features. Once you find a distribution you'll want to go to its web site. Most distributions come in the form of a CD image that you need a CD burner to use. But you can buy CD's already made, or simply find a different distribution that doesn't require a CD burner. After you make the CD (or whatever you needed to do) you have to repartition your hard drive. Go into control panel/administrative tools/computer management/storage/disk management. If you're exceptionally lucky there'll be a spot that says 'Unpartitioned' or something. As long as it's big enough (2 gigs is fine) you can go on to install Linux. If you're not as lucky as this all your hard drive space will be partitioned. If so you can still continue (do you really need Windows?) or install a new hard drive. Once this is done you can go on and install Linux. Just follow the installation instructions, and *hope* the partition info is right. If you have any empty space there shouldn't be any problems. Otherwise you should pick up the phone and call up your neighborhood computer nerd. Congratulations. You may or may not have installed Linux. If the latter, scream. --- In a nutshell: Download Linux. Burn a CD (select 'from disk image'). Install a new hard drive. Install Linux using your new CD. Wonder what the heck went wrong. Disclaimer: If this all doesn't work, don't blame me. Consult a professional. I'm not one. --ihope
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.