Jump to content
xisto Community
Sign in to follow this  
iGuest

Hazaa's Spammer Awards

Recommended Posts

Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you the Spammer Awards. These awards are handed out to people that I feel are constant Spammers and need to be named and shamed.

 

First up on the list is

 

geancanach: Major offense occured today (see post date). Some people just don't know when to leave. I'm sure you will be able to see all the Spam around the board. I advise that you make a note of his email address and sign him up to every PORN website mailing list.

 

Stayed Tuned For The Next One To Be Added To The List

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey now, don't be so hasty to judge. if it happened to you what would you do? at least he has the stones to step up, although I certainly don't agree with the approachhttp://forums.xisto.com/

If it happened to me. I wouldn't be a *BLEEP* about it. I would respect the Admin wishes. If you read the E-mail it says he was banned for spamming or requesting twice. If he was banned for the double request, he should also be banned for spamming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey now, don't be so hasty to judge. if it happened to you what would you do? at least he has the stones to step up, although I certainly don't agree with the approachhttp://forums.xisto.com/

If it happened to me. I wouldn't be a *BLEEP* about it. I would respect the Admin wishes. If you read the E-mail it says he was banned for spamming or requesting twice. If he was banned for the double request, he should also be banned for spamming.

however, i am no longer interested in being unbanned

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

since im labelled he top spammer, may as well add it here too anyway

 

judge for yourself. message admin sent in reply to me asking.

To: "geancanach@clerk.com" <geancanach@clerk.com>

CC: 

Subject: Re: banned

Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:34:08 +0200

Return-Path: <nukehosting@gmail.com>

Delivered-To: geancanach:clerk.com@mail.com

Received: (qmail 12999 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2005 09:34:20 -0000

X-Ob-Received: from unknown (192.168.9.68)by mta1-8.us4.outblaze.com; 14 Jan 2005 09:34:20 -0000

Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192])by spf0.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E619C5B5FDfor <geancanach@clerk.com>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:34:18 +0000 (GMT)

Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so779973wrifor <geancanach@clerk.com>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:34:08 -0800 (PST)

Domainkey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;b=IxB69/wxwB81s7M8Ru5bSjKfSX1noiutbur8FyLgF7Hf2vgErgersBEyDllbXVCpF5Bmbl5KAao2Rvln1lU+DIhurWNHd14GRbN/H/HyC/rW99zrY8VovPobv2l32HKCcVFIoSKADG3gUbq+cPhVXolzYiBkP0mZ1K4ZQkAquJo=

Received: by 10.54.59.9 with SMTP id h9mr279673wra;Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:34:08 -0800 (PST)

Received: by 10.54.20.66 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:34:08 -0800 (PST)

Message-Id: <d714576a050114013410f3c733@mail.gmail.com>

Reply-To: Free Nuke Hosting <nukehosting@gmail.com>

In-Reply-To: <20050113235654.74D191F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com>

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

References: <20050113235654.74D191F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com>

 

Show Basic Headers Back To [iNBOX] 

 

I have banned you because your were spamming or you register 2

usernames on our forums.

 

 

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:56:54 -0500, geancanach@clerk.com

<geancanach@clerk.com> wrote:

> when I went back to the freenukehosting.com website again this evening, it

> said I was banned. I have recieved no notice nor explanation as to why, nor

> was i listed as banned in the banned topic when i checked from another

> location. I would like you to look into this matter and correct it ASAP.

> Your expedience in this matter is most appreciated

> -- ___________________________________________________________

> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com

> http://www.mail.com/int/?sr=signup

 

 

--

Free Nuke Hosting

for support visit http://forums.xisto.com/

 

and my response to which i am still waiting for a reply

This message was sent with High importance. 

To: "Free Nuke Hosting" <nukehosting@gmail.com>

CC: 

Subject: Re: banned

Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:09:27 -0500

Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mime-Version: 1.0

Received: from [62.238.14.98] by ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com with http forgeancanach@clerk.com; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:09:27 -0500

Importance: high

X-Originating-Ip: 62.238.14.98

X-Originating-Server: ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com

 

Show Basic Headers Back To [sENT] 

 

no, that isnt quite true. in our house we have a network set up through a single server, thus making all internet connections through the house have 1 ip address, but each account was from a different person on a different computer. upon checking the forum rules (again) i noticed that there is nothing there that would indicate that that is not accepted

 

you will see the date on the first mail was 1/13, so if you can find any spam from me prior, please point it out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can believe you geancanach, my house is on a network too. Its my family's desktop, my laptop and my bro's laptop with the same main IP and 3 different router IPs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, this guy spammed us. So i went out and signed him up for every freaking newsletter i could find. He will never be able to use that email address again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.