Jump to content
xisto Community

Reddish

Members
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Reddish

  1. As mentioned throughout this topic, you wont make an income from these sites unless you can advance program yourself which I will mention in a bit. Why? Because, lets say you read an email and earn $0.02 per time (this is also a very generous amount). You dont need to actually read that email. Just click into it, and then click the link in the page to activate the $0.02. Now, each email you receive would take about 30 seconds to complete, including the clicking the email, scrolling down and clicking activation link, waiting on the window to open, closing it and deleting that email). Infact, 30 seconds is doing it in good time too. Great, but... That would give you time to complete 120 emails in an hour, which would generate you $2.40 per hour. Just a tad lower then the minimum hour rate I'd say. To top that off, you would be lucky to receive 5 to 10 of these a day, and I stress the lucky part... In relation to the survays, they act much thee same. "Complete this survey for $0.50". As above, it could take you up to 20mins to complete one of these survey. Earning you a cool $1.50 an hour!!! I believe you would be better off filling out a survey to the local college science department. They might give you a fair doller for use of your body??? Anyhow, as I was saying above. You might make $50 a week, at most, by completing these money making schemes. But thats when you sign up to over 50 different sites. So thats about $1 per site which I believe is average. I remember setting up an account with one of these scams a number of years ago. I believe I got my balance upto about $6 or $7 over a number of weeks. Then, as these sites do, it closed down because it ran out of advertisers. The minimum withdrawl was $25. And I was a long way off this mark. I rest my case...
  2. I dont agree with any changes in football. The rules currently in place are enough for the game to run smothely as it is. When a football game finishes, people then start to talk of what just happened. Of course there are disagreements, but isn't this the love of the game? Imagine when the game finishes that everything went so fairly that their was nothing to talk about! People say in the English Premier League that the big four clubs get the decisions that win leagues. But I disagree: Example1 People say Utd get most 50/50 decisions. Is this not because they are top of the league? If a decision is made against them that may cost them the league, no referee is going to jepordise their career over a second yellow sending off offence. Example2 Ronaldo and his diving: As we know this is an expensive player. Why is he expensive? Because he makes a difference in a team. He has quick feet, so hence the reason he wins more penalties for his team then other players. Yes, he dives a bit, but personaly I believe he doesnt get enough free kicks. Here is aa quote from sky sports live commentry: Video wont stop this from happening. These players are pros, and are coached by pros, so they find weekness in opponents before the game so they have the advantages in the game. eg. If a player has a week left leg for tackeling with, when dribbling past him go to his left, he may foul you. Football is a flowing game. And as every manager states, "Hopefully with a bit of luck on the day" So I say "NO" to video evidence or any elabourate rules.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.