Alain_Lalonde

Notice from jlhaslip: Previously posted material needs quote tags, whether your original work or not. http://www.angelfire.com/zine2/modernmagazine/july2.html

There are interesting observations upon this subject. Notice from jlhaslip: Quoted material needs to be within Quote tags

Absolute SpiritsBorne of a tendrilCarrying lightThrough space Hasn?t left anyone downHas not arisen over themWithout a fore-thoughtErased nightmaresWe wrote historyBrought the worldTo its knees and gave a speechSold the barPurchased czarsWas cruel and kindHard and SublimeWove the threadColonized expanseAbsolute and so grandeParallel requiteSoldiered conscriptsProps all fitJourney man with womanAbsolute spiritThe Prey That SwoonGod has seen fitto let me sitand watch the blue sky dance beneath the heavensAnd though I do not knowExactly how far up it isI believe that it is allright to try to guessthe things which god wanted to keep secretFor man is wonderwondering manWonder before wonder bornOvermanAnd super headsof minds estateTransforming man into greater manAnd distinct manHelp is under a great span of human bonesAnd forgiveness is its fleshFor under paths shared and walked upon in different mannerssociety has walked each as we continue toWe shall share in the path foreverWalk with me take my handMan is like a fishin the seaswimmingdowncurrentsof tidesWaves of oceanAnd tearssaltAnd as the salt of menThe spice of foodMan swims beneathThe prey that swoonsSeas warmThe fingers march across this bitter landcsapeColdness, wonderThe symptoms of our timeFade into the black waves babyAnd fade into the black nightIfIf I had a hammerI would bash it in the eveningI would bash till midnightI would *BLEEP* itAnd make an end of youIf I had a hammerI would lower it downI would timely roundI would gleefully soundIts silver moment rightI fIfIf you were uptightI would unwind youIf you were uprightI would unwrap youIf you were just rightI would just buy youI would remember your wordsI would forget your deedsI would invent what?s worseI would forsake your dreamsIn the them of ifBecause if you were itThen I would be betterAnd if I was betterIt would be your dirthIf you were not itThen I would be And If I was, I?d wish I had a hammerRepeatable Variation of Interoperable DependancyYou know I need youWhen the spaces in betweenAre threats unseen,Getting closer closer closerTo me to beOh you know I need youI need your policyEven if it isn?t mimeIsn?t kindIs it right?Oh you know I need yoursThere in the comingThere in the fallingThere where those are coming roundSee how they say they can when they can?tI know you have a helping handSee them, repeat them, uphold them, And twist themIt doesn?t matter what you say anymoreJust as long as you understandPh I need you even whenTheir complex and full of deceitI still bleedI still feelI still breatheOut every branch like the greenEternity of dependencyFor you know as well as meThese are both laws of war and scienceOne is the catalystThe other the choiceThe other the decisionAnd when all elementsArrayed one after anotherI can manipulate themAnd make them you: my servant Vast MindThis is your vast mindIt echoes songsThis is your vast findNames are screamsThis is your timeIt makes me seeThis is your vast lineProxies invite meThis is your vast mindIsn?t it surrealThis is your vast mindHow I fought your dreamsThis is your timeI borrowed to weaveThis is your vast lineEmperors new scheme

Synchronicity has been studied by Carl Jung, his interpretation was it was a shared existence, where many elements are familiar-linked to a culture. I would not disagree with this perception for I do, have some interesting insights. For example, what differences are there between other existential parallel oriented thought experiences, namely reincarnation, d?j?-vu. I would as follows make the following observations from my own experience.1. Limited geographical or social variability potential2. Limited engagement or people who repeat their routines.3. Tangential perception of symbolic languages and or interpretations of circumstance, lucidity which are sharedThese are all elements which may make a real synchronicity, as a bad experience, or a devalued shared experience, in which case, they may take the overtones of the more drastic perceptions of being stuck, which would be those associated with repetition. The question one has to ask oneself at that point is crucially---is it really happening, am I really in a tandem flow with the world around me, or will this world be a negative experience, or a fruitful existence where I create rather than deconstruct a synchronicity. This was once a option which I experienced. So I set up a small experience experiment. The following is its outcome. I regarded the situation of my life as being open to the possibility that it was really happening, or that it was not really happening with any meaning beyond my perception. In other words it may or may not have been an outer force acting upon my being at that time. Then I waited to see if there would be any divergences where I could scrutinize danger areas fulfilled or non synchronistical. In hind sight I will attest, I have noticed the events of the repetitive over toned natures were usually instigated by meddlers, or trouble makers. As progression went on they seemed to be running out of options, and suddenly there began to be divergences between reality and repletion. The question arose therefore: are any divergences instigated on the first instance in every instance by closed minds who cannot but react negatively and deconstructively to a good fruitfulness. The method of experiment was therefore to watch one instant to see what familiarity there was which could reveal the inspiration and impetus of these at times very synchronistic backwards movements. Almost like a haunting where a force draws you into something. As I noticed there were many lapses at that time I watched, and observed to see if the same feeling of d?j?- vu would occur. It was a vey quit night therefore it took a bit of doing, and there was one single thing which happened---and it was disgusting?suddenly the feeling of d?j?-vu returned. This event was so perplexingly ironic I had no recourse but to assume it was definitely still a negative synchronicity?but this time with a twist?it was attempting to pull me down almost as a last drawn effort. However a studious person must realize in order to interpret something accurately, one must examine all its parts. These were: 1. They did not have anything to do with me. 2. I was simply an observer. 3. It was the most dismaying event I saw, it was almost a culminating event. 4. It was mundane, as much as it was ordained to be if negativity were to result in a real-life event. 5. This could not have been made up, for my implication, nor did it serve any purpose. I suddenly received an idea inspired by the perception of these elements of a long series of synchronicity. God cannot abide a world order which is based solely upon mundane issues, wholly within man?s experience. It t is also true of a culture or a society?no matter how small the location, it must rip itself from its own paradigm and cease its fascination with the conspiracies and that others arrange for it. ?A conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or to achieve a legal objective through illegal means. The essence of a conspiracy is the agreement; and the perceived harm is the increased danger from concerted action. An overt act in furtherance of the agreement is sometimes required by statute to complete a conspiracy, but the purpose of this requirement is merely to demonstrate an active agreement. Conspiracy may be prosecuted as a crime or as a civil cause of action. The presence of conspiracy expands the rules of evidence and procedure.? From US History Encyclopedia God will reward through the operation of the will the return of determinative force upon those which inveigle, and though law make all wholly restored to all its proper merits in so long as resource is applied, and quality is implicated by the people whose gift it has been God?s to invest. This is the only law we need, and the only one well endure. As an observer I was witnessing the mundane negative ordained by the real life existential reality of others. This clearly was never me. I was simply experiencing the effect of perception shared by others and my participation led me to see patterns which they could not so perceive. As a natural cause and effect study, I went back to the moment in time when the synchronicity began. This is important, for we must all realize synchronicity, reincarnation, d?j?-vu does not exist at all times as they are glimpses. The familiar aspect must happen, in order for their instance to be modifiable or modifying of their effectives. One is not born as a baby, then grow as a child into assured repletion, since all repetitions would be constrained to the birth itself, into a locality, and by the same people. Thereby a point in a life must show this demarcation. This logic would be seen as a point where an individual begins to think and operate on his own, or begins to have a preponderant effect rather than being affected. This would be most surely true with the event of the beginning and of birth. Where was my synchronicity? It was indeed at a certain point. At that time to me when strange familiarities began to construct their realities and paradigms about me, and, they were always from a point of origin outside of my doing! Indeed what was different were perceptions I had of a positive nature. The conclusion therefore was inevitable?I was watching the world unfolds as it was meant to operate within itself for it could not perceive any other way contrasting me and making me focus upon issues of which alacrity permitted a focus and perception of synchronicity.