Vyoma

Yes shadowx. I figured that would be the best approach after pondering about it for a while and asked for them to switch to a newer server in the ticket. Oh yes, anwiii, my sites have been up and running for a long time. I had been a member of Xisto for couple of months, hosted through credits that I earned from posting there. After a couple of months, when my website picked up, I notice that it was having repeated downtime. But I did not complain then, other than issuing a ticket to get it fixed. Since the hosting was provided for the effort I put into posting relevant content at Xisto, I realized that I could not complain about that. After that, I switched to paid hosting over here at Xisto - Web Hosting.com and moved over my website. I even grew the number of websites I have been hosting. I started with a 3S plan. And it did have downtime issues - and then I complained. They fixed them as and when the issues came up, and once I did see them slack up on meeting their SLA. After a year or so, I switched to a 7S plan since I had a pretty large website and was highly trafficed ( KalaaLog.com ). When I ran into issues, I did raise tickets and follow up with them. I have around 30 support tickets raised from 2007 to current date. Of course, couple of them were sales related questions or minor cron related issues. But the rest of them were either problems with DNS or MySQL databases being down - critical issues. When this happens, my websites are not accesible. So speaking overall uptime, it might be 99.9% but that does not mean for a service period they can have a downtime. I understand that asking for a 99.9% uptime every day (which is around 14 minutes downtime) is not practical. I am not asking for that. (I know since I too have a day job where I support applications and systems that adhere to SLA uptimes). But for a duration of one month, and a subscription period of 6 months, if downtime is 40 odd hours, I will be very very concerned about the remaining five months. That is the reason, I bring this issue up when they have gone beyond the 99.9% uptime for a month (and hence the title of the thread says that the database was down for three times in January). The complaints I raise are from the perspecitve that I want the Xisto group to do well and not with an malicious intent. I owe some of my loyalty to Xisto and its sister sites, since that is where I started and they supported me. Basically, I am lazy. I do not want to go out searching for another reliable webhost. If I can raise a complain, and get Xisto - Web Hosting/Xisto to do better then it is good for me. I would like to grow my websites to an extent where I would need to take up VPS Hosting from them, may be even Dedicated Hosting at Xisto - Web Hosting one day. But to do that, I would want to have a sustained growth and that can be only done when my current hosting is as reliable as advertized on the homepage. If Xisto - Web Hosting/Xisto does not do good, it is not good for me. I will need to re-evaluate other services and that is a costly step in terms of effort for me. Ooo boy. I turned out to be big rant.

Oh yes. They did respond to the support ticket after 9 hours. They did say that their MySQL database was having issues and they have sent it to "senior admin to get a permanant fix". Meanwhile, they are suggesting I move my sites to some "new servers". I am not sure how that is going to help. If they can ensure that MySQL databases remain up and running there, why cant they do the same on the IOTA server? The 99.9% uptime rule gives them 87.6 hours in a whole year. In a month, that would be 7.3 hours. They have already crossed past the SLA for this month, in my opinion. It is around 9 hours of downtime for this issue. Counting the two other issues that occurred this month, the downtime hours come to 15-16 hours. That in my opinion is not a 99.9% uptime this month. The month is not even over yet, there are 8 more days left.

Well, it is up now 8 hours after the issue began. And the link that you provide does not list the server on which I am hosted. I am checking the cPanel now and it says: Server Name iota

Hi,Currently, as for past 50-60 minutes, all MySQL databases are down. Ticket ID: NRY-328984Normally - I do not open a thread here when there is a problem. I just raise a ticket. But there is a cause of concern for me at this point in time.One thing is that I have been escalating the status of the ticket and updating with my findings for the past duration since it was down - there has been no response - not a single word from the support team.Second, the number of times the databases are down. I went back and checked up my notification setup and these are the dates:09-Jan-2010 - Ticket ID: WWH-96026721-Jan-2010 - No ticket but issue occured when I was not checking. But I have notification email sent from vBulletin installation that the databases was down.22-Jan-2010 - This is the current issue - ongoing that has not been fixed as of now. I am still receiving notification emails that the databases are down.Out of the set of sites I run, one of them has pretty high traffic and earns revenue round the clock. Another one, I run website optimization experiments and conversion tests which assume that the websites are functional throughout the testing duration. The websites being down since the databases were not working is throwing a wrench into all the effort.Why are not the MySQL databases not monitored and alerts set for the support personnel?

This ticket: CDM-922809 is sitting out there for almost 24 hours with no response. I have not been able to access my sites for that duration. Opaque, I think the L3 support for this ticket has been way more than 12 hours. Edit: It is way more than 24 hours now.

What is the response time on tickets? I have seen that recently it is more than 12 hours. Earlier it would have been fine when there was chat support - now that chat support is not present, it is quite frustrating.

Not sure if this would fit your budget constraints, but here is the link to Wacom's entry model. http://www.wacom.com/de-de/404?prevUrl=%2fbambootablet%2findex.cfm It is under $100.

Thanks! I do use a graphic tablet, and if I remember I did use the graphic tablet - Wacom Intuos3 6x11. Speaking of concept artist, I intend to do it one day. I dont think I have the skill level to that point yet, so there is a lot of practicing left to do.

I think iPod is over rated too. I do own a iPod Touch, and not sure what the big deal is all about. I use it regularly, but the annoying thing is the elitist Apple does not provide their iTunes software for Linux. I am just waiting for the two or so years to pass by when my iPod would die (the battery replacement "feature" is another draconic feature in my honest opinion), I would just opt for some other music player, which I am sure could be used with generic software - which means I can use it in sync with my Linux installs.

Ah Sellaman - I see. I think I now have a inkling on your technique. Do post one of your progressions - would go a long way to understand the technique. Hmmm - abstract/modern? I am not sure. I did see quite a lot of abstract pieces - the last time being when I had been to New York - spent about half a day at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Part of the displays there were of that category and most of them did not make much sense to me. Some did not even have enough work put into them (in my opinion) to garner my appreciation. Here is how I see it. I am an engineer by day. Most of the things I do, I try to do it to get something purpose served either for me or for other. I try to get it done efficiently. When I do artworks, I just see it as an extension of serving myself or others. It is more of an performance than just mere self expression where it is quite satisfactory when more people are able to appreciate what I have done. And going down the abstract path - in my opinion - I see it rarely happen. Do I think abstract and modern styles are not art at all? No - of course not. It is just not where my interests lie. You must know by now the phletora of mediums and styles we have in visual arts alone. I just happen to dabble in digital art - specifically in digital painting (more like the traditional technique - everything is done using brush strokes without any filters) and vector illustration. For the past few years as I have been working on those styles, among other techniques, I have had exposure to color, texture, value, composition, and more interestingly towards form. Lately, I have been so interested in line and form that I am putting more energy into doing just illustration (albeit digital). I believe it will help me in both the style - digital painting and vector illustrations. And with these three areas/niches, I think I have enough of it and I would expand only when I really feel the need. Ha! You're welcome yordan. Well Quatrux - I think that is what the style is all about. You could get a rabbit out of the picture. It lets many have several different interpretations, and take you in a journey of pondering. Quite exactly as yordan does above? Yup, laniczech - why is it that we have to die to get our artwork appreciated? Yet, from my experience in watching some of the works (even by Picassa), I just dont get what the big deal is all about.

Dont think there is an issue with your reply not being specific. Those links that you gave seem to give me enough to read through and understand the concepts I had missed the past 4 years. Thanks!

I somehow had a inkling this would be the user-experience feedback you would give, Sellaman. And I agree - use the tool you are comfortable with. Because, in terms of digital art, they are just that - tools. For me, more than using it in widescreen, I think the bias I have towards Open Source software, and the fact that Linux (X) Window Managers are able to catch the hints thrown by GIMP (Windows cannot do that) which allows me to customize its layout just the way I want, makes it a better choice for me than Photoshop.

Abstract art has always escaped my comprehension. That said, I can appreciate the technique. I like the deep texture that you have some how maintained to keep it crisp - both in terms of texture and color. And if you did this following traditional techniques and not using any filters of your software tool, then it makes me more curious. I would really like to know the technique involved - any intermediate screenshots would be much appreciated. Edit: I think I do see a shape of an angel - here is my interpretation paint-over.

Ah - this thread seems to have slipped me! As yordan mentions, the painting itself was done using GIMP. At that point, I was using Camstudio and Windows Movie Maker to create the video itself. (These days, I have shifted to Linux - I use gtk-recordMyDesktop and Cinelerra). :| I am not sure what a hollandaise boat is. Just was painting what fancied my mind. I did start out doing simple paintings initially. You can check out my painting specific gallery at deviantART - almost all are done in GIMP. If you have been exposed to Photoshop, you might find GIMP a bit overwhelming in terms of UI. Have patience, and once you see it as a tool, it will fit right into your workflow.

Background: I got back into C++ programming after some leave from it. More on that experience in my other thread. I started this particular project (initially, would be hobby - may GPL it if results are good). What is the directive on using namespaces in C++? Coming from Java background, the packages which translates to namespaces in C++ (from what I understand), is required to avoid the crazyness it brings if we don't use. For example, the generated (proxy) source files (either from WSDL or XSDs using WSDL2Java or JAXB respectively) to communicate with other teams systems, can cause conflicts if we dont target each of these to their own packages. And hence, it makes sense to use packages for our own Java classes. It avoids conflicts and this further promotes better refactoring and reuse of developed and tested components. Back to this C++ project. It would end up as a application/executable. I do not think it would be a library ( STL, GTK+, QT, gtkmm, mysql etc). Even in such cases, is there a point of using namespaces? I am not sure I can see any advantage of this. Perhaps my understanding on C++ Namespaces is wrong? Any thoughts? Or even links that describes "when to use C++ namespaces" would be much appreciated.