SecretSocietyofStoners

Well my good people of the world it is something man made,unatural mechenical or in other words artificial etc that has the ability to "think for its self" but its more than just that that seperate our brains from every other organism on earth it is the fact that we can make a thought a discision based on given facts which we logicaly work out in our head and make a logical discision. This is something an animal could never have the brain power to eg. if a monkey saw a loin covered in blood it would not relise that it had just killed something and therefore it is covered in blood unless perhaps it smelt the blood or any other similar circumstance. But for a brain or computer(lets just call it a processing unit because thats what it does, process infomation) to gain artificial intelligence that processing unit must be able to make a certain amount of connections in a given time. Now connections are tiny electrical zaps that travel from one place to another in the processing unit telling it what to do etc Now I dont know the exacts statistics for how many connections a human brain makes in a millisecond but its something like 10 billion I not really sure but the least amount of connections you need to acheive artificial intelligence is something like 2 billion i'm not sure about that either but look it up if you need to.Peace out brothers and bong on!!!(and I smoke marijuana by the way and im only 15 and I know all this *BLEEP* and read about what I explained about nanotechnology is aswell, hehehe who reckons i'm smart? and yes I really did right this myself from what I know and I didn't copy it!!!!)

Thats really interesting and good to know, I always new google would go far from the day I first seen an add for it and thought what a laod of.... lol yeh anyway google is really cool and I might have to get my friend who has a gmail account to send me an invite again because I lost his old one lol.Peace out yall

Yes carbon could be a good replacement but they would have to modify its organic compound to match the famous signature of silocon other wise there is no way it will work.And grey goo (the combineded masses of nanobots) could be a possibility if they learn to work together and then a defencive nanobot would have to be designed 2 destroy these swarms or goos.And also the possibility of them having the entelligence of a human is quite possible considering the minute size at which the cuircits would be manufactured and how much they could still fit on a microchip or i actually should say nanochip when where talking about nano technology any way wat u could still fit on a microchip that small. It would be powerful enough to be able to make enough connections from one point to anouther in a givin time to be able to have the intelligence of a human beingThx peace out

really people come on i have a question that i would like some one to anser. How the bloody hell could you possibly convert organic matter ie the person or thing your goin to telepot into infomation on a harddrive? because remember hardrives are a code run by magnets which use the numbers 1 and 0 on a decible system then converts that to information so on and so forth so what are you gunna do stuff the person in the hardrive and send them through a wire? mabye that quantom teleportation or wateva that otha guy said could work because your send the information of the person and reconstructing a new one not actualy sending the person

well every one i know alot about this subject so its lucky for yas aint it? well i know that at the moment nano technology is impossible because what they need is a replacement for silocon (the stuff in microchips) because silocon can only be made so small before it just burns up and turns to ash when the electricity is put through it so there for they need a replacement that has the exact same signiture of silocon wen put under an electrical current because this signiture is the way all the computers work and run so therefor they think that an organic matter would be the best solution bearing in mind that it can be reduced to ridiculesely small sizes therefor being able to construct a nanobot(which is made up of microscopic microchips which are made from this organic meterial) the size of a becteria etc and yes as other people say these nanobots would be able to be purchased in pills and swalloded but the possibilities are more than just killing cancerous cells these nano bots couls keep a 100% active coverage of your bodies hydration,mood ect therefor keeping a constant watch on your body and being able to travel anywhere in your body via arteries etc and be able to kill any diseises,bacteria etc litterally 1000 times faster than your bodys defence systems and kill them intantly.sounds good dont it? but yes there are bad things that can happen if these nanobots gain or are givin artifical intelligence then they could go against us and form massives swarms and plauge the earth eating all its organic meterial because the are also organic which means they need to feed......and yes artificial intelligence can exist all it needs is enough connections from one point to another and a certain time and it will be able to think for itself and at the rate where goin with technology it should be done in about 20 yrs or who knows if they find an organic meterial matching the signature of silocon the dead set bloody fastand a certain time was ment to be at

I?ve downloaded Mozilla SeaMonkey 1.0 and I?m using it right now. I was all excited as I thought SeaMonkey would be Firefox+Thunderbird+Nvu all rolled into one. Not Quite.First off, SeaMonkey has an identity crisis on it?s hands. I started it up and it felt like 1997 with Netscape 4.7. Seriously people, either make a default theme or make the ?Modern? theme default. People do judge on look and the Netscape 4.7 look is not good.Second, some of the features I?ve come to know and love from Mozilla products are missing.Toolbar is not customizable. Toolbar icons can?t be small. No RSS support No themes (well not many) No extensions (that I can find) It just feels like old days, except with tabbed browsing.The email is a little better as it does have inline spell checking, but it does need to have an image makeover and some toolbar button customization.Now I know that the workers of SeaMonkey are doing their best and know about all the issues and I hope they keep working at it. I think their is still a area for the all-in-one browser/email/chat application and Mozilla SeaMonkey could be it.All in all I think SeaMonkey is ok but not great. If you want to keep your email and web browsing together, this may work well for you. If you like themes and extensions, then hold off until developers create some. peace out

Having spent since late '94 using text editors to build web pages, I've come to expect certain things. The most important is that any web page I write only changes when I want it to. With a text editor, you always have complete control over your web page.Now with some visual HTML editors, this does not hold true. I've experimented with loading pages into both Netscape and Microsoft products and then saving the result. The page may or may not still look the same, but the HTML behind the page almost always has been changed. Merely opening the page in some editors *automatically* changes your HTML even if you make no edits of your own on that page. If you have gone to the time and expense of building a valid web site, you don't really want semi-random changes to that site.Dreamweaver is a powerful tool for developing and maintaining web sites that will respect your HTML. The full commercial package includes a lot of tutorial information to help you start your web sites, and either Homesite 4.0 (for PCs) or BBEdit 5.0 (for Macs) which are stand-alone text based editors. Having both a good visual editor and a good text editor in one package can be a real advantage for a small company. It will give people a choice of tools to use, and some will prefer one to the other.peace out