Aka_Bar

Microsoft officials have been saying for quite some time that Windows Vista will ship with antispyware software built into the operating system. But for more than a year, Microsoft's top dogs have been quite clear that Microsoft has no intentions to bundle antivirus software into the product.Vista Anti virus issue...Despite this seemingly straightforward (at least in our minds) delineation, company watchers were all in a tizzy this week over Windows head honcho Jim Allchin's recent proclamation that there would be no antivirus software bundled with Vista. Several days later, we're still trying to figure out why anyone was surprised by this simple statement of fact.Microsoft has a lot of new security technologies in the pipeline. Windows Antispyware, which Microsoft renamed Windows Defender late last year, was part of the latest (December) Vista Community Technology Preview (CTP) test build. Microsoft seems to be moving steadily toward baking into Vista at least some base level of antispyware software.Microsoft's consumer antivirus offering, known these days as Windows OneCare Live (code-named way back in the day, "A1") was not expected to be integrated into Longhorn/Vista — at least not since Microsoft floated a trial balloon about the viability of such a plan back in 2003 or so.In fact, the beta of Windows OneCare only works on Windows XP with Service Pack 2 installed. Microsoft has been saying for a while now that the OneCare service won't be compatible with Vista. Company officials haven't spelled out explicitly why it won't; our guess is Vista's two-way firewall is incompatible, among other reasons.(Update: Microsoft officials told us after this article was published that Microsoft will do a version of OneCare for Vista users "in the future." A spokeswoman provided no further details on timing or features.)But bundling OneCare into Vista? Not once has any part of OneCare, including the antivirus software that is the crux of the service, been integrated into of any of the Visa CTP or Beta 1 builds of the operating system.There's a third Microsoft security offering that no one's mentioning here: Windows Client Protection. Windows Client Protection is a security service that will be targeted at enterprise customers that is quite similar to Windows OneCare. Our sources tell us Microsoft is poised to field a first beta of Windows Client Protection in February (we'd bet around the time of the RSA Security conference).When Microsoft officially unveiled last year its plans for Windows Client Protection, company officials said the service would be designed to thwart viruses, spyware and rootkits on XP and Vista systems. Windows Client Protection will be integrated with Active Directory and other "legacy" Microsoft products, such as its Internet Security and Acceleration Server, Windows Update and Windows Software Update Services.Again, Microsoft never said it planned to bundle Windows Client Protection into Vista. Officials didn't say much at all about the company's plans for pricing and distributing the enterprise service.As Web posters far and wide have pointed out, Microsoft brass are well aware that building antivirus software into Vista would likely raise the hackles of antitrust regulators here and abroad. (Why bundling antispyware seems to be OK, on the other hand, is more of a mystery to us.)There's more than just legal repercussions factoring in here. Microsoft sees dollar signs when it sees Windows OneCare and Windows Client Protection. The company is betting that there are users out there who would shell out for someone – even Microsoft – to secure their systems against the insecurities that have plagued Windows and Internet Explorer for years now. Subscription revenue, if you can hook people in, can be far more lucrative than a one-time sale of a shrink-wrapped operating-system bundle.What's your take? Do you think Microsoft is being sufficiently clear about where it's at and where it's going with its anti-malware plans for Vista? If not, do you think Microsoft is clouding the picture intentionally, and why?

I heard about Services like that and i dont believe that they working truly! its just promotional ****. There a many kinds of services like that on the enternet like http://www.voipcheap.com/dashboard/and freecalls.com!! their calling programm is same and they are also telling that Internetional Calls tolly free.. but in the real they are asking to buy Credits! And it tells like: Sorry, this destination is not free. Please buy credit or log in. Or call only the free destinations. but in Free List they are telling its Free...

hello every body.Im spending lot of money to international calls, and i have decided to use calls like Skype and Pc to Phone calls but i dont know good sites. Good sites i mean cheap for usage!! please if someone knows about this issue, helpme! Put here your opinions about this question and Link that can be used....May be someone knows free ways to call....At moment i have 512K connection.

miCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG, i can help you with Russian Language, if you want you are welcom, i wll help you with pleasure!!! cotact with me any time!! Russian is my first lang so i wll not have problems with that!! i have years of experiense in translation From English to Russian im doing it better then Russian into English

Im mostly using Genius Stuff!!and mostly using Genius mice, its perfect working and perfect for specialty work, for example design, programming, entertiment and ect...at the moment im using 2 diffrent models:1- Genius Wireless SmartScroll- mostly for entertiment2- Genius Optical with high dpi- mostly for programming and design

Internet Explorer 7 does not work good with FTP!!! With the recent release of IE7 (basically pushed out and forced on you, aaarrrgg), those whom used IE6 as a FTP client will notice some changes and issues. Here are the highlights of the changes: * The URL syntax with embedded username and password (ie. usr%3Apswd%40ftp.domain.com) and similar syntax is no longer supported. * In order to "Login As..." there are a few more clicks involved, and a new window must be opened. * Actually, IE7 itself does not support a non-anonymous login at all... you must open the site in Windows Explorer. Solutions 1) Continue to open FTP sites using IE7, but if you need "Login As...", do the following: Click on Page in the upper right corner, then click "Open FTP Site in Windows Explorer". When site opens in Windows Explorer, then click File, Login As... Enter your username and password, click Log On button. 2) You can save a few clicks by opening the FTP site directly in Windows Explorer. There are many ways of opening Explorer, like simply opening "My Computer" then type your FTP URL in the address bar. Like ftp.sitename.com , then if you need to logon as, open File, Logon As... and enter username password, Log On button, as above. 3) Recommended Solution - DON'T USE IE OR EXPLORER. I have never liked the use of Internet Explorer as an FTP client. As an IT manager, the issues caused by this have created more calls to my help desk than any other issue. IE is just about the worst FTP client I can think of. So, what to use? Well, there are many free FTP clients that do a much better job.

well lets starti think here are many Factors can be problem. So first of all you need to check your hardware!!! may be your Sound Card or Sound System crushed!!! so go and check in BiOS if its working after that come back here and report me, i think that i can help you

micnoo, read some OnLine HTML beginner lessions!!!if you wll search cearly you wll find chapther about FLASH!!if you are not able i can give you sources and links for that

Jaskaran, how??i didnt hear about it!! please tell us more!! i think it should be interesting information, give us links and sources for your information!!!I dont thnik sowhy they wll kill Saddam's brother? I cant see the reason!! anyways i think that its wrong information

The American company iDefence, prosecute subjects of computer safety, has declared compensation in 8 thousand dollars to hackers who will manage to find out vulnerability in browser Internet Explorer 7 and the newest operational system from Microsoft Windows Vista. Competition of hackers becomes a part of the program of "money-for-vulnerability" (pay-for-flaw) which purpose is improvement of systems of safety of the most popular software. The prize in 8 thousand dollars will be received only by six умельцев which before all will send results of the hacker activity to experts iDefence. To receive monetary compensation, it is necessary, that it was possible to take advantage of the found out vulnerability from the removed computer, and it should be present at all last of updating and additions to IE or Vista. The mistakes found in beta-versions of products, will not be encouraged with compensation. At the moment iDefence - it is far not the unique company, concordant to pay to hackers of money for search уязвимостей in programs. So, some time back Trend Micro has organized similar competition with prize-winning fund in 50 thousand dollars. The award has got to the hackers, managed to find out vulnerability in Vista.

Demirelli Welcome to OUR FORUM!! so lets start Paying for web site advertising services is more advantageous than handling your own web site or your company’s promotional concerns. This gives you more time to focus on other essential aspects of your business. Besides, these service providers know all the ins and outs of web site advertising. There is also a risk in entrusting your website to service providers, especially those offering cheap and sometimes free advertising services. The question is, how do you know you are not paying for senseless hype just for guaranteed web site advertising? Here are two important things you should consider in choosing an advertising company: where do they list your website, and what are their core services and add-on services. Since the main goal of website advertising is to deliver targeted traffic to your site, it is beneficial if your site is indexed on major search engines and online directories. The more search engines and directories your site appears on, the better, as this increases probability of attracting more consumers. Aside from listing your site to major search engines and directories, the advertising company must have guaranteed web site advertising techniques such as link exchanges, pay per click, email marketing, banner ads, press releases, newsletters and blogs. Exchanging links is one of the most effective and affordable means of driving targeted traffic to your website. This is done by sending other websites (high quality and highly related sites) text or keywords where a link to your website is attached (use keywords that people are most likely to use in the search engines). Pay per click is another guaranteed web site advertising technique and is becoming very popular nowadays. This allows you to make your own ads, and lets you decide when they should appear. The good thing about this is you only pay when somebody clicks through a link to your site. Does the advertising company provide high quality content or articles for your website? If it does, then it’s a perfect choice. A very good quality content that is, rich in information and necessary keywords used in major search engines is good way to keep your site users coming back. and here is some simple things about Promotion http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/

interesting, i haven't seen this topic before,well, most of all im using:For Internet:- Mozilla FireFox- Opera- Putty- BMmeter- Mirc- OutLook Express- The Bat- FlashFXP- TotalComander Ftp Clinet- Download Master- Yahoo Messnger- ICQfor Design:- PhotoShop- Macromedia Dreamweaver MX- FlashMediafor Programming:- AppServ- DenWer- MySQL- Microsoft SQL Server- Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003- OLEDB- AceHTML- Delphi Borland- C#/ASP.NET compilators- DisASM- Dreamweaverfor system:- Total Comander- Microsoft Word- Microsoft Exel- Microsoft PowerPoint- Winamp- Jet Audio- Sound Forge- Kaspersky Anti-Virus Package- WinRARthis programs in my daily using!

thanx this portal was helpful for me it realy helps downloaded this scipt:

Quatrux, i had collected this information from stracture of Searching Machine and google servers using that today it realy works, i have MSI and MSP certificate you can trust me, there is big diffrence between www and no www may be you cannot feel it, but believe me if u cant feel it, it doesnt mean that its not the true,Do you know diffrence between request of http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ and myhost.com?? please if u dont know look in DNS servers sracture books and you can easly find answer to your question i believe!!some servers cannot understan your request to domain without WWW but it think at now time there is a little part of it working!!! but any way you can use that tip and Google realy give higher rank for that!!

Before optimizing your on page factors and building the inbound links to your sites, you first need to look at your domain name and URL structure.Here are a few tips from statistical research about domain names and URLs that might be contrary to what you have heard in the Internet Marketing forums...Include Your KeywordThe keyword that best describes your site should be included in your domain name. Use Overture.com inventory tool or WordTracker.com to find the keyword that has some search volume. Try not to use a keyword no one is searching for.Avoid DashesPeople have already taken many .com domains that are good keywords. But these domains can still be registered when hyphens or dashes are use to separate the individual keywords. The idea behind this was to help Google see the keywords. However, Google can see the individual keywords in a domain name even if there are no hyphens separating them. You might see some domain names with one hyphen in the top ten, but Google tends to rank domains with hyphens lower than domains without hyphens.Keep It ShortThe optimum character length for a domain name including the "/cgi-sys/defaultwebpage.cgi; and the ".com" is 11 to 16 characters. That sounds odd and it doesn't leave you with much room but the research suggests this. Google tends to rank short domain names higher.Register a Dot ComGoogle tends to rank ".com" domain names higher than the other domain name extensions such as ".net," ".org," ".edu," ".us," ".biz," ".info" and ".name."Include WWWGoogle tends to rank domain names that include "www" higher than domain names that don't include it. Include the "www" in your URL when you are doing your link trade request or in the resource box of your article submissions.Put a Forward Slash at the End of the URLGoogle tends to rank URLs that have a forward slash "/" at the end higher in their search results pages than URLs that don't have it. When you trade links with other websites or you put your domain in an article resource box, remember to include the forward slash at the end.Any ideas??