scherzi

I agree about the possibility of God existence. Why not. The key is that the Universe nature can be different of our mind structure in some way. In that case, we are not able to know its rules. Maybe our minds make us think that for every effect there is a cause, but perhaps that's not the way it has to be.

The previous message was in response of "God did the big bang", not to the message quoted.

When the Church tried to explain that the Earth was the center of the universe, they used to say that even though all the Universe spinned around the Earth, God did that turn in some way that it seemed that the Earth was not the center of the Universe (because ancient astronomers could observe how the movement of the celestial objects refuted the Church's postulated). Besides, they said that the angels were the cause of that movement. So it's the same to say that the big bang is caused by God but God wants us to watch that is a natural phenomenon. Even if it could be true it isn't at all a good conclusion since you haven't even a proof or trace of God itself. Let's say that it's begining to rain. A raindrop falls onto your hand. Did you said that was God who throw it from sky but it seems done by water condensation? Then in order to know the properties of the rain phenomenon, we couldn't explain them without knowing before the characteristic features of God and measure him. If God produced the big bang, what about radiations? Why does gravity stop the expansion? That expansion shouldn't have produced any residual energy, since the causing energy came from God. I think God and religions in general are good for humankind. Accepting the relevance of the religious fact, we must consider that if you were born alone in the deepest forest, you woul'd able to observe the Nature but surely you won't believe in God, but in an anthropomorphic nature trying to compare the reality with your own mental reality and the way you experience the life. I could go on with tons of definitions and ideas to reach the same conclusion. I think this ones are enough. I am not saying that God is a fake. Only that we cannot observe the Nature thinking in God to explain it. There is no way out.

The energy of the cyclones and hurricanes, and the dispersion of the energy casued by the deaths is irrelevant if compared with the Big Bang. It can be said that is equal to zero. If the whole earth explodes, the total energy should be still equal to zero if compared with the big bang.I'd say almost zero, but that "altmost" should be something like one billion part of a sand particle in the whole galaxy for example. Maybe ten billion or maybe more.I read about the "equator" of the Universe expansion in a previous message. That equator is the total mass of the Universe.If the Universe had a mass enough to stop the expansion totally, it would cause the opposite effect, a Big Crunch; and if the initial conditions of the Universe were the same that the Big Bang, perhaps the Universe could explode again.By the other way, the big bang doesn't has to have a cause. The Universe is not subjugated to human mind and its rules.

All this comments are what you should not do. Following the jokes of the previous suggestions.Hehe Background midi music. Amazing.I tried once to do one site with midi, a classical scherzo very cool. haha.Right click disabled is very useful if you don't know how to get the source code. And for those, like me that use to download or open links with the right button for security questions is very very attractive.Also those black background with red text 1 size sites are really user firendly. Billions of text lines at the same page are recommended, specially mixed with thousands of banners so you get rich with clicks in one week.All this comments are what you should not do. Following the jokes of the previous suggestions.And what about flash?Hey, don't hesitate to insert a 2mb flash interface with no text. Your site will be ranked 1st on google and 56kb visitors will love it. Also you can include a lot of keywords for your shoes online store like sexy, free, freeware, pamela anderson, and so on. Great idea!All this comments are what you should not do. Following the jokes of the previous suggestions.You can use cookies too, or mysql to store your visitors information, also better to include a trojan and maximize your customer satisfaction. But if you wanna earn money rapidly, affiliate mlm links and invest a lot of money in ebooks like "I got rich while sleeping" so you can resell them on your web page.All this comments are what you should not do. Following the jokes of the previous suggestions.Good luck.Better if I try to think what to be done instead. hehe.

Hi all. THE TACHYONS In relativity theory we can study two types os particles (entities, existing things). a) Those that have a mass equal to zero: i.e. photons (light and other radiatons). Those that have a mass over zero: the rest. The first ones travel always at the speed of light or "c". For the second ones "c", the speed of light is the limiting speed. Why?. Because the mass of the over zero mass particles depends of its speed; and every time it accelerates the mass quantity grows. And when the speed is near to "c" the mass becomes infinite (with no sense); so it is impossible to accelerate it more. Now. We know that relativity talks about zero mass and nonzero mass particles. Their speeds are light speed and below speed light respectively. Theorists thought that since everything can be possible, that a third type of particles could exist. Those wich always travel over the speed of light. So, has it mass to be infinite then? Nope. These particles should gain velocity when loosing energy and travel slower when they adquire energy. Why? To fit the relativity theory. The theory deals too about a "particular time" for each particle in the Universe. That means that when you see one particle travelling somewhere, you see it moving according to your time scale, and if you where that particle, you'd experiment the reality with another scale of time. For example. You have a fried of your same age. If you travel to a black hole with him, stopping at its limits, then your friend gets in and you stay, you'd see how your friend increases rapidly its speed into the hole pulled by the tremendous gravity inside. On the other side, your friend would see how the activity in the Unvierse seems to stop, because the gravity in his space has changed the time scale. Your friend will see you always young in his long travel into the black hole, but you'd see him to fall always faster and faster till he dissapeared into the hole. Since the mass is dependent of the velocity, it increases its value while velocity increases. A particle travelling at the speed of light should have a particular time where everything outside is accelerated, and for those who are travelling slower things require more time to happen. Tachyons could have a particular time that allowed them to travel faster than light and have a mass over zero locally if that speed is only faster than light for another observer. Tachyons could be also one particular vibrational type of existence in Universe, like the rest of particles could be with a negative squared mass (with movement rules opposite to the nonzero mass particles) Who knows. THE IRRATIONAL NUMBERS Better that get into them, negative square should stand to opposite properties instead of opposite existence or negative existence. THE MULTIVERSE Quantum physics states the need of a multiverse to explain ceratin interactions between particles. I personally believe that this interaction can be explained by the space properties instead, so I believe that the multiverse theory can be replaced with an unified space-matter theory instead. By definition, multiverses cannot be independent. If they were independent they wouldn't exist toegether, since no intercation should make them be toegether as they were independent. A multiverse is a sum of different universes coexisting at the same moment. How are they at the same moment? Because the particles in the universe exist in different dimensions at the same time. When a particle interacts with another universe, it is called a ghost particle because we only can see the effects of its interaction, but not the particle itself. COCKTAIL Now, let's put both multiverse and tachyons in the same place and remove it. If tachyons can travel faster than light and have its particular time, opposite to the zero or nonzero particles, they could travel back in time between different Universes. Time: 11:47 here now. hehe. Not that time, but the movement rules in the Universe. Time for us will be the particuar physic conditions of a particle in movement (note that we never said that were particles with movement=0) Movement=0 for me is the space itself, the particles are the expression of a nonzero state of the space (for me too). Something similar to the strings theory. If we go back in time we could live in another Universe and change a lot of things. But we wouldn't cure the pain here, because this Universe exists as it is and its timeline is defined already. We could create another Universe with a new timeline and live there even if we weren't able to see the difference between both of them. RESOURCES http://www.answers.com/topic/tachyon >Check also this book by David Deutsch: The Fabric of Reality Penguin Books London, 1997 For spaniards: La Estructura de la Realidad Anagrama, 1999 PedrĂł de la Creu, 58 08034 Barcelona

Yep, be sure that is not a critical process of your system. hehe.If you cannot delete it in safe mode be careful.If you want to by-pass the recylce folder, press shift key at the same time you delete the file. If you are in doubt, type the file name into google and find information about.

Hehe, maybe this will be too much Engish for me. I will try to explain myself. Big bang? At this point of the topic discussion we have reviewed the major guidelines of this theory: - Universe is expanding and galaxies with it, or it is changing its scale, that is the same. - We see the turn into blue effect of the distant galaxies due to its movement as we hear changing the horn of a train passing away. - etc. What is all about? Words. (remember The Matrix?, yep the film) What are words? They express the thoughts of people and let us communicate. What do we talk about? About perception. Perception is more or less the world that we can see around with our senses. Our senses are dependent of our body structure and travel over our body as electrical signals. Electrical signals are made by electrons. Electros are something like little particles that we cannot see even with a microscope and are around in all the Universe. Everything that is solid has electrons from our point of view of what solid is. The question is: Could a group of electrons explain the Universe? I think it cannot Well, some people can reply: "God is the explanation". Maybe is my response. I will ask something. If God is the response, tell me what or how God is. The response: God is (a large list of qualities) and finally: God is infinite (for example) and incomprehensible because of its grandeur. Well about infinite. Infinite is only a mathematical concept. The concept per se is illogical and irrational. What infinite means in maths is that the result of a certain situation is unknown and cannot be explained and there is no result for that argument. Also in physics infinite is related to some phenomenon where something "grows" constantly like the mas of the center of a black hole. However is "infinite" because is unknown and seems to be very big. Then, are we crazy that explain the world with illogical words? Nope. We are consistent with the logic. The logic are the rules that tell to our brain how to think. We instinctively apply those rules that are innate. Children are teached the basic rules of nature (classical ones). They aren't able to understand abstract concepts so teachers tell them that the rules are absolute in order to them to understand it. The problem is that when they are young men and women usually teachers aren't able or haven't the time to tell them that these rules and concetps leart in the childhood are only ideas, but not absolute concepts. They will teach their children the same way. I personally think that the logic is based in two concepts: life and death, existence and not existence, yes and no. Any of them is good. That's why logic works. It's the end of the chain. Our brain is built to grant existence and fear non existence. Nothing more. Do you believe that the human being is only an ape that falled from a tree? I hope it is not. But whatever I hope or believe the fact is that I cannot demonstrate anything else what I can define properly and according to logic and perception. I cannot say if the Big Bang ever happened or if it will be a Big Crunch. Science doesn't studies the nature itself or the origin of the world because it's impossible for a size limited brain. If the Universe is everything in nature (God is supposed to be beyond the nature "supra natura") and we are a part of the universe, we aren't able to fit all the information of the Universe into a part of it, that's illogical. And about God. I will ask you a question. Wich size is God compared with universe? God is infinite according to Saint Tomas of Aquino. Then if U is the lengh of the universe and G is the lengh of God U/G=0 and G/U=infinite. And this? hehe. something divided by infinite is equal to zero and infinited divided by anything is equal to infinite. There is no solution. No way to define God. No way to demonstrate God, no way to know God. At least with logic and reason. It's easy to deal with concepts like God or infinite or big bang. I believe that the response is our capability to understand the world around and our size, of course. Well. Since that words are apparently made by my group of electrons, maybe they are only a compound of chemical reactions without necessary, real, meaning. No more meaning that a lighting has to say by itself of the Nature. Maybe, and I pray for it, they have some sense in the structure of the reality. Not even me or you can be able to know it. And if it is, then the Big Bang surely happened, because the scale of the Universe is changing and anyone can see it. And we don't know if some God exists, but we can believe it or ignore it. Reason says also that every effect has a cause. Then there must be a first cause. I don't know the English word, in Spanish is called "aseidad", without cause. Since we use reason to think, we aren't able to determine its limits. If anyone arrived at this line. Congratulations by your patience. I expect my English was good enough to make it readable.

Hi I will give you some ideas of how getting and examining the resluts in php. <?php // Open the url, read only mode. For example Google. $url=file_get_contents('https://www.google.de/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=BwkjVKfAD8uH8QfckIGgCQ&gws_rd=ssl'); echo $url; // Divide url content into table sections using the " " sting to divide (you could use also "div" or "td" or whatever else $urlparts = explode (" ",$url); //Now you have got an array containg all the url content, divided by the " " strings // You can get it using the $urlparts[n] variable, where n is the number of divisions made // for example. In order to view the number of values stored in the array $urlparts. $counter= count ($urlparts); echo $counter; // Now you want to find some string to get the next one. We will search for "images" // We will write a loop to do this task. You'll use a loop to check the variable. // Firstly I include some html code to introduce it. echo ("<br>"); echo ("<br>"); echo ('Those are the "$chaincounter" values during the loop:'); echo ("<br>"); // Now the loop $chaincounter==0; while ($chaincounter <= $counter) { echo $chaincounter; echo " "; $chaincounter++; } // Hehe! Well, I printed into your screen the values, but you can do whatever you want with the array ?> At this point the code is finished. You'll have to analyze the strings. Check these functions: count_chars ereg implode join ltrim similar_text split str_replace str_word_count strchr strip_tags stristr strlen As you see, php contains lots of functions. These are string functions, you'll have to check array functions too. Get the string that identifies the content you want and apply it to find the cells to extract its content. As you've seen you can write html script using the "echo" function. This means that in a loop, you can "echo" tables too. For example: I have a variable called $results that contains the values of a database field. I will put it on a table using a variable called $values. .... echo "<table border='1'>\n"; while ($rows=mysql_fetch_assoc($results)) { echo "<tr>\n"; foerach ($rows as $value) { echo "<td>\n"; echo $values; echo "</td>\n"; } echo "</tr><br>\n"; } echo "</table\n"; ...... I don't know your php knowledge but it isn't a difficult language to write. About the other question. In order to get realtime update you should run your own server (however maybe there are internet services that could call your page, I don't know). So, your pages will be updated every time you have a visitor that runs the code. Besides, you should store the data into a database like MySql. I don't know how to create a script capable of updating itself by the other hand, and it's time to go to dinner now. 21:55 ups! Maybe in javascript, but javascript and users of Windows XP SP2 have troubles sometimes. Ok. hope you get that page. I had a similar idea and still have to develop an application similar to your idea. But first I must finish updating my webpage and an online store. ups. No time for now. Work must be done too. Cya

The reason because macromedia is so different to photoshop is because before adobe and macromedia weren't toegether. Adobe developed Golive (currently golive CS2) with an interface similar to Photoshop and capable of keeping the tables and cell structures made by photoshop websites. I am not very introduced to macromedia's Dreamweaver, but when I've tried to load a html file made with Photoshop into Dreamweaver it has collapsed. If fp stands for Frontpage, then macromedia Dreamweaver is better. Its interface is very plain when you understand the basics and it is a powerful tool. However I think Microsoft usually doesn't produce well finished programs, but just the necessary to run. Here is a good comparision between both programs: http://www.duxcw.com/digest/Reviews/Software/fp/fpvsdw.htm

It can be due:- You are trying to delete an active process, a program that is running in RAM while you try to delete it. Some active use other files that will be write protected too.- It isn't an active process but a document currently opened by another program. i.e.: you are deleting a doc file while reading it with word.- You opened before a data file and the system considers it's still active. I.e.: the same of the doc file, but you already closed it. If you want to delete it without restarting, you can use the file/open window of that program and delete it.

First of all. This is my first post in this community. I want to send my greetings to everyone. Also, I am spaniard. So, please do not put too much attention to my writting style. I will do my best to make it easily readable. For this one, I prefeer brief explanations so that readers don't speend unuseful time to get the ideas. - Font is small and lines very close i.e. http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ - The same font with more line spacing would be more clear. - Flash isn't search engines friendly. The search engines won't be able to read it losing positions when indexed. Plain text over jpg or gif background would be better for that purpose. - I don't really think animated flash images all the time is really important. As the precedent post said, animated gifs could be used instead. - Animated menu buttons can be done too without flash. Beware with javascript on Windows XP SP2 and its script blocker. - A really important thing are online forms already available. It will increase the communication with potential customers, since they don't have to open its mail client or web mail account to send you a message. In my case and on my web, forms have worked improving very very and I repeat, very much the commercial contacts, even now when after two months offline isn't well positioned on search engines. (I have much more contacts now than before when unique visitors were about 30X more than now). Besides, the site is in a temporal ad supported server and isn't finished. Not the best conditions at all. - Return to web design. In order to imporve download time if using images, test the archive sizes and, very important, the number of images. Reduce it to the minium possible. - I am foreinger and it cost me a little to understand that bw was bandwidth. Also the @ symbol was a little confusing with no sense for me. There are 800 million people speaking chinese, 450 million spanish, 402 million english and a total of about 6000 million human beings, much of them searching web hosting. - When entering the order page I don't see the order options, but the heading image and menu. Maybe it makes more constant the aspect of the site, but I'd like to watch the prices and plans at first sight. That large intro flash page is very cool. I won't use it for the order page that way. http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ is a better example of order page. - Solutions page. Again the large heading. What about html anchors? And the plans at the bottom. I want to see the plans when the page is opened!. Hey the plans are just perfect!. I like also the free hosting with domain register. - It's the same paying 1 month than one year. I know the prices are absolutely cheap. But what else would make me pay one entire year when I can pay monthly for the same price?. (99 cents difference). - Another question mailto links. Why not link to a form instead? target can be blank - When entering onto about us or contact page I missed the company information. - Packages page. Beautigul top image. Where are them? - http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ . I cannot open links. Using IE on Windows XP SP2 - Links page. I would use darker colors for links text. - Site map: I didn't see it. Cya.