Jump to content
xisto Community

calixt

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. WeaponX,I am not sure but the reason for your "leftovers" may be that not every line-break is a "paragraph". I understand that the replacement method works well but covers not all the line-breaks in your documents. Maybe there are some "manual line breaks" in your docs which do not have the field code "^p" but "^l".
  2. Klass,I am not sure but I think you refer to the file http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/. IMHO in your query the part "$AttackBonus" should be replaced by "$_POST['AttackBonus]". As far as I know, the attribute "enctype='multipart/form-data' " in your <form> tag is not necessary.
  3. rantsh,I agree with yungblood: research is the only way to get skills. you should try to find out about the most recent security issues by using your favorite search engine to look up words like "bugtraq", "vuln", "pen testing" and so on (i am sure you will find more applicable words the longer you research...) everything i know about getting access to remote computers i found on the internet, so you surely will, too. cryptography is even more difficult. a good site to start with ist http://www.cryptographyworld.com/ last but not least there are some web sites with hacking & cracking challenges whre you can try your skills ... You might like this one for a start: http://www.try2hack.nl/ greetz calixt
  4. Nemisis,you need not be scared. Evolution does not contradict the bible. Many creationists insist that the universe has been created in 7 days - and they mean: 7 x 24 hours. But they forget that "days" and "hours" only make sense when there is a sun (which has been created much later, if I read my bible correctly....) Thus, a "day" in the first chapter of the bible can not be the same as the "day" we are used to. If you are still in doubt, consider the light of the remotest stars: How long has it been travelling to reach our eyes? There is another point you are worried about: Does man have an immortal soul? If you study the bible, you will not find much support for this concept. St.Paul has a different attitude towards the eternal life (read 1 Corinthians 15, 35-58): Our resurrection will be a new creation by the Lord himself. "Soul" is a concept of ancient greek philosophers, not of the bible, but it had found its was into catholic theology. If you don't accept what I wrote above: Belief in evolution theory should not hinder you to believe in a human soul. Man* becomes truely man* by having a relationship with God, and this relationship is a gift by God himself which we cannot "earn" by ourselves. The awareness of this relationship may of course be called the "soul" of man. Anyway, you need not be scared not to believe in God. God will not permit that you will fall out of his hands (read Romans 8,38-39 or psalm 139). Calixt *means men & women
  5. WeaponX,have you tried replacing paragraphs with commas using Edit->Replace? To search for a paragraph mark, write "^p" into the input field (at least, it's like that in my German Word-version). Calixt
  6. Just like WeaponX, I think simply replacing "ats and dots" with their well known html-encodings won't do. I am working at a university and had to learn that university web sites are a paradise for harvesters For our department I decided to use the javascript technique, combining cloaking and putting pieces together. The idea is to let the harvesters not even discover that there is an e-mail address on the page... <a href="javascript:send2('ex a, mp, le#u n,i-er lan,,gen,,!d e')">As you can see, the traitorous bits are cloaked and some meaningless chars are inserted. A colleague of mine has developped a different solution (using server side scripting, of course): email addresses will not be shown before the visitor has proved to be human. His explanation is in German but I am sure you will guess the idea behind it: http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ Calixt
  7. Hi whistle,can you create a subdirectory with $credir="/home/freehost/t35.com/u/r/url/" ? Which values have $_SERVER["PATH_TRANSLATED"] and $_SERVER["SCRIPT_FILENAME"]? Are they the same as $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']? Calixt P.S.: Just found two links which might be helpful to explain the difference between DOCUMENT_ROOT, SCRIPT_FILENAME, PATH_TRANSLATED: http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ http://php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php
  8. Hi whistle,when the source of the iframe does not belong to the same host as the main page, it will not have access to the "parent" object. This policy shall prevent cross site scripting. Anyway, for your purposes it does not make any difference: If parent.location.href is not "http://reurl.net/see/test.htm; then the iframe src has not been called by the proper page. Of course you can try to use $_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"] but this can be faked as Hercco already mentioned. But if $_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"] is not set then the iframe source surely has NOT been called by your Page A, and that is exactly the information you need, if I understood you right. Greetings from Nuremberg (Germany), C.
  9. whistle, if I understood you right, you can use javascript to reach your objective. Example: Page A (iframe_a.html) <html><head><title>Mainpage</title></head><body><h2>Mainpage</h2><iframe src="iframe_b.html" style="width:80%; height:50%"></iframe></body></html> Page B (iframe_b.html) <html><head><title>iFrame</title></head><script language="javascript">[tab][/tab]document.writeln("Calling page (link): "+parent.location.href+"<br />");[tab][/tab]document.writeln("Calling page (host): "+parent.location.hostname+"<br />");[tab][/tab]document.writeln("Calling page (path): "+parent.location.pathname);</script><body>...</body></html> Just compare your.domain to parent.location.hostname to decide what to do with the page requestIf parent.location.pathname has "iframe_b.html" then the iframe has been called directly. Hope this is what you meant calixt
  10. I believe that meanwhile all major search engines know how to deal with page ranking "tricks" using metatags. But I need them, anyway. Here are some examples: 1. Special chars <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">Be sure to put the charset-metatag first, if you do not use entities for special chars (like Ä in German). First also means: before the <title>-Tag 2. Metatags in PHP <meta name="description" content="Text to be displayed when page is shown in search engine result.">When I "discovered" server side scripting and started coding with PHP I at first included the same description-metatag in each file, regardless of the contents. Thus, I got poor SE results - nobody could obtain useful information on pages like "mydomain.tld/index.php?module=1" and "mydomain.tld/index.php?module=2" and so on. It became much better when I included specific description-metatags for each file. 3. Redirection <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=http://mydomain.tld/index.php?param=something">When switching to PHP, I had to deal with the fact that all my former html pages (which now became obsolete) were still listed in SE results. So I kept them but redirected any request for them via the refresher metatag. (Later I learned how to use a 404-Error handler instead but I still use this metatag sometimes.) 4. Prevent Caching <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache"><meta http-equiv="expires" content="0"><meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache">For some pages I had to ensure that they were loaded anew everytime when requested. These three metatags should cover any proxy and/or browser. Have a nice day calixt
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.