Jump to content
xisto Community

currahee

Members
  • Content Count

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by currahee


  1. Celeron's are very bad. I don't care about the processor speed, its performance is horrible. I mean even for a budget CPU, it only has what... 128KB of L2 cache which hinders its performance A LOTGokul- i386.... you have a 386 processor? :) Well my PocketPC is powered by an Intel PXA270 312MHz processor, the best there is right now :) (model, that is. There is a 624MHz version that only Dell Axim's have)Oh yeah while we're at it,My Laptop- Athlon XP 2200+ m (Thoroughbred 128KB L1, 256KB L2)My sis' desktop- Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz (Northwood 16KB L1, 512KB L2)My Pocket PC- Intel PXA270 312MHzMy TI-83+- ZiLOG z80 8MHz :P


  2. I am both excitied and worried about Longhorn at the same time. If its a huge faliure, Microsoft will have a huge problem on their hands. As you know, Longhorn isn't a simple Operating System to run. Heck, I think you need a computer from 2003 to even run it decently enough. It will be a major problem for laptops too, as I tihnk it will drain the batter faster than ever


  3. Your obervation is right. But I'm no moderator and not even willing to become one. What pisses me off is that people make either posts which don't make sense or use cut and paste. There should be a proper watch on those things.

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Then why not apply for a mod position then? :P

    Daniel- .. how DO you live with those specs?! :):)

    You really should get a new computer. You can't run ANYTHING with that arcaic computer!


  4. WinXP- The most stable Windows version ever. I can't believe after 11 years, they are still developing on top of the Windows NT core. Windows NT 3.1 was released in 1993 and today, Windows XP is built on top of that, as is Win2k and NT4.WinXP also runs games better and faster than Windows 2000. Its like Windows 98SE and Windows 2000 combined. Visually, its on par with Windows 2000. Win2000 just doesnt have that luna XP interface. I remember t he hype so much about XP :) Win2000- Not a bad OS, marginally less stable than XP but it still works fine. Visually its a cleaned up Windows NT4/Windows 98SE interface and some nice GUI effects added on. Kinda really bad for running games though. Its a business work OS, not a gaming hobbist OS.WinME- Worst OS ever! I think that's all there is to say about that.Win98SE- Microsoft did a good job with SE. They cleared up and well implemented the IE 4 integration (... is that right? Though at the cost of creating so many security holes....). It was more stable and had Plus! pack built in.Win98- Horrbile OS. Microsoft didn't integrate IE4 well, resulting in slowdowns and too many crashes to bear.


  5. Yes macs do get them, and they (cookies, not macs lol) can be a bad privacy invasion tool. It wouldn't hurt to clear out the cookie cache once every so often, but be warned: for sites where you have it set to so that you will automatically log in, you will need to reenter your password and handle and also have it checked for the automatic log in again.


  6. Its impossible to 'overcharge' a battery I guess... well it would be but it would be rare unless you were using a third party battery that was not approved for your laptop.Batteries have normal degredation over time. They do not hold the same charge every single time. Its also bad practice to charge, empty, charge, empty repeatedly with the battery. I did that about 35 times and now my battery capacity is 50% of the original!If you want to store your battery it will live longer if you make it hold a 40% charge... but don't deplete it


  7. Woah woah woah wait... they're getting rid of the .NET framework? I thought Longhorn was the next iteration of the .NET framework...And shipping WinFS in a future service pack in 2012 is crazy. Longhorn will be 6 years old by then! I think you mean a much more earlier date.DirectX has NOTHING to do with OpenGL based games. THey might render correctly and unless Microsoft does something like reverse compatibility, Direct3D based games (yes, even OpenGL games since they use DirectSound) will not completely work at all.Oh yeah, i've seen an early build of longhorn. One of my friends got a PDC build by going to a conference. WinFS took a lot of memory up (180MB of RAM/180MB of Virtual memory)


  8. Currahee, are you crazy!? It is clearly said in the Intel.com/Intel.cc website that the lowest end P4 was 1.5 GHz. The first version of the Pentium 4 was the 1.6 GHz one. I can't even imagine a 900 MHz Pentium 4 without any proof!

    Are you talking about Pentium III?

     

    I have two computers, ones a Pentium IV with 3.6 GHz clockspeed and 800 MHz FSB, L1 Cache: 256 KB, L2 Cache: 512 KB and L3 Cache: 1024 KB(1MB)...

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/desktops/desktop-products.html

    No, take a look again. The first intial Pentium 4 releases were 1.3GHz, 1.4GHz, and 1.5GHz. However, their performance is negligible compared to that of the 1.0 and 1.2GHz Pentium IIIs. You won't start seeing a lot of performance boost with Pentium 4s until you get in the 1.7+ GHz range when comparing them with Pentium III processors.

    As for the 900MHz, I just saw that on a star surplus ad on PC magazine. I'm skeptical about that too since it would be really useless... a P4 running at 900MHz =P


  9. The 1.5GHz Pentium 4 was in the first batch of Pentium 4 releases. 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5GHz versions were released... I also saw some 900MHz versions too.They have 16KB of Trace execution L1 cache and 256KB of L2 cache. On the contraty Athlons (thunderbird) have 128KB of L1 cache and 256KB of L2 cache.And hyper threading only improves performance in some cases... the most you'll get in average is about 3-5% more performance but that's like a small amount of performance improvement for people to use the feature


  10. what type of CPU genetate few heat? I hate heat CPU. :)

    my laptop is Intel PIII 1G, is not good, always hot. can any one recommend a lower heat CPU?

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Technically the Pentium III 1GHz is generally a lot cooler than Pentium 4s and athlons and they consume not a lot of power. :)

    Celerons... you really shouldn't use them at all... They are essentially pentium 4s with a quarter of the cache. Performance is dull on them and you're much better off getting an athlon at the same speed for a MUCH MUCH cheaper price


  11. Actually you know what? you guys should head over to Paul thurrott's website and read his article on how to slipstream Windows XP service Pack 2 onto your Windows XP CD so you will not need to reinstall Windows XP service Pack 2 evertime you reinstall XP or wait a long time for XP SP2 to finish installing.Actually I highly recommend slipstreaming, its more convenient and the OS runs much better if its slipstreamed in the first place

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.