Iran Has Reached Nuclear Energy! whats your idea?

I dont know that you have heard it or no but as I understood in these days it was a HOT NEWS in every

big website & TV Channel...that the president of iran "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad" said "Iran has reached nuclear energy and now its ready to use in reactors" you can read more complete information about this topic in yahoo & BBC.

 

 

this is from yahoo:

 

 

 

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowed Thursday that Iran won't back away from uranium enrichment and said the world must treat Iran as a nuclear power.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Which currency do you have the most faith in next year?

 

 

Japanese yen

U.S. dollar

Euro

 

 

 

The comments were made as Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, arrived in Tehran for talks aimed at defusing tensions over Iran's nuclear program.

 

"Our answer to those who are angry about Iran achieving the full nuclear fuel cycle is just one phrase. We say: Be angry at us and die of this anger," the official Islamic Republic News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

 

"We won't hold talks with anyone about the right of the Iranian nation (to enrich uranium)."

 

Ahmadinejad declared on Tuesday that Iran had successfully produced enriched uranium for the first time, a key process in what Iran maintains is a peaceful energy program.

 

Iran's deputy nuclear chief, Mohammad Saeedi, then said Wednesday that Iran intends to move toward large-scale uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges, signaling the country's resolve to expand a program the United Nations has demanded it halt.

 

"Today, our situation has changed completely. We are a nuclear country and speak to others from the position of a nuclear country," IRNA quoted the president as saying Thursday.

 

The United States accuses Tehran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to produce nuclear weapons but Tehran says its nuclear program is merely to generate electricity.

 

The U.N. Security Council has insisted that Iran stop all enrichment activity by April 28.

 

ElBaradei told reporters after arriving at Tehran airport that he believed the time was "ripe" for a political solution." He said he would try to persuade Iranian authorities to meet international demands for "confidence-building measures, including suspension of uranium enrichment, until outstanding issues are clarified."

 

Also Thursday, China said it is sending an envoy to Iran and Russia to discuss the dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai is due to leave on Friday.

 

"Recently, there were some developments of the Iranian nuclear issue," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao. "We expressed our concern. ... We hope the parties should exercise restraint and not take any actions that lead to further escalation so we can solve the question properly through dialogue and diplomacy."

 

At the United Nations a day earlier, China expressed strong concern over Iran's announcement that it had successfully enriched uranium and called on Tehran to suspend enrichment. However, both China and Russia have repeated their opposition to any punitive measures against Iran.

 

On Tuesday, Iran announced it had produced enriched uranium on a small scale for the first time, using 164 centrifuges, at a facility in the central town of Natanz.

 

Saeedi said using 54,000 centrifuges will be able to produce enough enriched uranium to provide fuel for a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plant like one Russia is finishing in southern Iran.

 

In theory, that many centrifuges could be used to develop the material needed for hundreds of nuclear warheads if Iran can perfect the techniques for producing the highly enriched uranium needed. Iran is still thought to be years away from a full-scale program.

 

The IAEA is due to report to the Security Council on April 28 whether Iran has met its demand for a full halt to uranium enrichment. If Tehran has not complied, the council will consider the next step. The U.S. and Europe are pressing for sanctions, a step Russia and China have so far opposed.

 

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday the Security Council must consider "strong steps" to induce Tehran to change course. Rice also telephoned ElBaradei to ask him to reinforce demands that Iran comply with its nonproliferation requirements when he holds talks in Tehran on Friday.

 

On Wednesday, Iran's nuclear chief, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, said the United States had no option but to recognize Iran as a nuclear power. But he said Iran was prepared to give the West a share in its enrichment facilities to ease fears that it may seek to make weapons.

 

"The best way to get out of this issue is for countries that have concern become our partners in Natanz in management, production and technology. This is a very important confidence-building measure," he told state-run television.

 

 

 

Picture of "Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad" ===>

 

 

what is your idea about this?

 

what will america do?

what is reaction of IEAE??

will iran use it or no?

does iran have right to use it?

will iran make ATOMIC BOMB! ??

 

please say your opinion about it

 

Thank's much

Edited April 13, 2006 by nini (see edit history)

I dont know that you have heard it or no but as I understood in these days it was a HOT NEWS in every

big website & TV Channel...that the president of iran "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad" said "Iran has reached nuclear energy and now its ready to use in reactors" you can read more complete information about this topic in yahoo & BBC.

this is from yahoo:

Picture of "Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad" ===>

 

 

what is your idea about this?

 

what will america do?

what is reaction of IEAE??

will iran use it or no?

does iran have right to use it?

will iran make ATOMIC BOMB! ??

 

please say your opinion about it

 

Thank's much

 

Well, a couple things: Iran has no coal that I am aware of and they know they have hit pak oil (there are folks here who still have their heads in the sand about that). They do not have hydro power readily available. What oil they do have is better used for export. That leaves very few options as to what to power their economy with. I am not saying Iran won't use the process to create Nukes (given our recent behavior, that only makes sense as well), but that they do have a perfectly legitimate and reasonable purpose.

 

Now, they could negotiate with us for another way out, like North Korea did. Then again, we did not hold up our side of the agreement with NK, either. Which is why Nk is once again building a nuclear program. We have no credibility with anyone right now.

 

Again, I am not saying the situation is not bad, just that we are also to blame and Iran is acting in its own interest. Can we tell them they should not help themselves?

i have to agree with evought. if we in the western world are allowed to generate power using nuclear technology then it is only fair that Iran should.Not that that makes me any more confortable about their plainly mad president and his government posessing such capabilities. But really what is one fundamental [i.e. simplisitic] rightwing religous democracy to another?i'd much rather everyone just got some solar panels and thyen disarmed all nuclear weapons. But that would be too sensible for our leaders wouldn't it.

Yeah!I'm agree to both of you too.But I think iran is complitly deffrent from North Korea because they made atomic bomb & after that they continued negotiating but iran didn't made any one yet...totally i am agree!what's the others idea??

I agree with you all concerning Iran. In fact, I wouldn't even put an 'if' on the statement that Iran is planning to have their own nuclear weaponry. Would they be mad enough to actually use it? Having said that... I believe there is only one country that was 'mad' enough to let one loose on a populated area... Certainly, Iran knows that the moment they detonate a nuclear bomb over one of their enemies, their country will cease to exist. Therefore, no matter how mad the Iranian president is, I don't really think that he would be foolish enough to push the proverbial button.

Therefore, no matter how mad the Iranian president is, I don't really think that he would be foolish enough to push the proverbial button.

Unless somebody else starts trouble with Iran, their leader would have to be possessed by Satan to even consider unleashing a nuclear weapon on any other country/population. I'm pretty sure that half the free world is going to keep an eye on Iran just to make sure the nuclear power doesn't become a nuclear weapon.

I'd rather not see anybody using nuclear anything for any reason, but we all know that's not going to happen anytime soon.

I agree with you all concerning Iran. In fact, I wouldn't even put an 'if' on the statement that Iran is planning to have their own nuclear weaponry. Would they be mad enough to actually use it? Having said that... I believe there is only one country that was 'mad' enough to let one loose on a populated area... Certainly, Iran knows that the moment they detonate a nuclear bomb over one of their enemies, their country will cease to exist. Therefore, no matter how mad the Iranian president is, I don't really think that he would be foolish enough to push the proverbial button.

The problem is, I am sure they will use them for thir own defense, conventional or nuclear. I also do not trust our current leadership to not back them into a corner where they feel it is "use it or lose it".

Yet another possibility is that some terrorist group may set off a weapon (say, in Isreal) and blame it on Iran.

Huff... Nuclear bombs will fly in the air soon if Iran and other get pissed Not good at all... Hmm.. Maybe they just treat us. But if Iran makes nuclear bombs and other big "bombs", who is trying to stop them? Not me.. Damn! It is so stupid to fight like that.

So...You think if iran reach nuclear power can be dangrous?

I think, this is going to be a fire and forget situation.They fire the missile in Israel, and that's it. Goodbye "Zionist Regime".

Edited April 30, 2006 by Opethian (see edit history)

The issue of nations going nuclear would only increase in the future unless a conprehensive solution regarding this matter is achieved and most importantly agreed upon by the 5 permanent UN Security Council members. Ad hoc decision on which nation can and cannot enrich uranium is just not going to work. As with all other technologies, the barrier to entry would only decrease in the future.