BigmanB 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2005 Which do you like better Panoramic or Still Photos? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
organicbmx 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2005 please define panoramic as opposed to still.still being a normal 35mm size photo?and panoranic being some kind of super wide still image?orbeing a rotating image on a computer that places you 'inside' the photographic location?thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2005 Dude panoramic has got it's own charm - but it can never emulate the dramatization/framing that you can achieve through normal 35mm film. Organicbmx: normally panomaric shots would mean a super stretched wide-view still shot, examples of which you can find at: http://forums.xisto.com/topic/82936-topic/?findpost=1064296604But nowadays the defninition of panomaric view is changing - and most likely the 3d-wide angle views, where you are in the center will also be incorporated into the definition of it. Regards,m^e Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
organicbmx 0 Report post Posted June 23, 2005 ok then. well i enjoy those 3d panoramics. normal panoramics seem a bit odd but ok.really the 35mm is king but for a wider view then a montage of 35mm photos is greatwhen normal film cameras take a panoramic photo do they atually change the focal length or do they just letter box the negative and then develop larger? it seems to me that the ones i have seen are the latter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
