Replicator Vs The Flood Who would win?

[csp4.0 1]

My friend was just arguing with me about who would win, a replicator or a Flood...

To make it fair, a flood starts on a planet with in excess of 1 trillion population, and a replicator starts on an uninhabited planet rich with neutronium...

To those who doesn't know what a replicator is... It is a major enemy in the Stargate Universe... Here is a picture:

http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/404.png (too big, so wouldn't be fair for dial-up users...)

and the Flood... It is an enemy that the forerunners gave their lives to destroy, but it has arisen again...

http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/

Both have extra forms, but the pictures are both the most basic form...

So, what do you think?

I choose replicator side, because if you think about it... Replicators are immune to almost every attack the Flood can unleash on them and don't for get the human-form replicators

[t3jem 0]

I would say the replicators because even if the flood did have the technology to destroy the replicators, they aren't smart enough to do so, I mean even the humans needed an extremely high amount of help from the asgard to form a weapon against them that wasn't even entirely effective; however, the replicators are incredibly smart and would probably launch the halos to destroy all the flood's food or they would just eat away the halos that the flood lived on.

[csp4.0 1]

Yeah, but remember that replicators have a way of making something so good, it made even the creators recoil in horror (i.e. the time when they sped up the maximum speed of a Ha'tak 600 times...)So maybe they can turn the Halo rings into something completely unexpected...