doran 0 Report post Posted May 17, 2006 Hey everyone and where I live there was this teacher that had gotten fired because she was a horrible teacher. Her performance was unbeliveably bad. She did not teach kids right and she just sued are district for 2.4 million dollars and she has won her case. Im wondering if you guys have heard about this. Our prinicipal fired her because her performance was bad and she turned the whole story around and said that it was racial discrimination and now our school district has a low budget. Post here and tell me what you feel about this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
leeleelee 0 Report post Posted May 17, 2006 For "Stupid in America," a special report ABC will air Friday, we gave identical tests to high school students in New Jersey and in Belgium. The Belgian kids cleaned the American kids' clocks. The Belgian kids called the American students "stupid."We didn't pick smart kids to test in Europe and dumb kids in the United States. The American students attend an above-average school in New Jersey, and New Jersey's kids have test scores that are above average for America.The American boy who got the highest score told me: "I'm shocked, 'cause it just shows how advanced they are compared to us."The Belgians did better because their schools are better. At age ten, American students take an international test and score well above the international average. But by age fifteen, when students from forty countries are tested, the Americans place twenty-fifth. The longer kids stay in American schools, the worse they do in international competition. They do worse than kids from countries that spend much less money on education.This should come as no surprise once you remember that public education in the USA is a government monopoly. Don't like your public school? Tough. The school is terrible? Tough. Your taxes fund that school regardless of whether it's good or bad. That's why government monopolies routinely fail their customers. Union-dominated monopolies are even worse.In New York City, it's "just about impossible" to fire a bad teacher, says schools chancellor Joel Klein. The new union contract offers slight relief, but it's still about 200 pages of bureaucracy. "We tolerate mediocrity," said Klein, because "people get paid the same, whether they're outstanding, average, or way below average." One teacher sent sexually oriented emails to "Cutie 101," his sixteen year old student. Klein couldn't fire him for years, "He hasn't taught, but we have had to pay him, because that's what's required under the contract."They've paid him more than $300,000, and only after 6 years of litigation were they able to fire him. Klein employs dozens of teachers who he's afraid to let near the kids, so he has them sit in what they call "rubber rooms." This year he will spend twenty million dollars to warehouse teachers in five rubber rooms. It's an alternative to firing them. In the last four years, only two teachers out of 80,000 were fired for incompetence.When I confronted Union president Randi Weingarten about that, she said, "they [the NYC school board] just don't want to do the work that's entailed." But the "work that's entailed" is so onerous that most principals just give up, or get bad teachers to transfer to another school. They even have a name for it: "the dance of the lemons."The inability to fire the bad and reward the good is the biggest reason schools fail the kids. Lack of money is often cited the reason schools fail, but America doubled per pupil spending, adjusting for inflation, over the last 30 years. Test scores and graduation rates stayed flat. New York City now spends an extraordinary $11,000 per student. That's $220,000 for a classroom of twenty kids. Couldn't you hire two or three excellent teachers and do a better job with $220,000? http://forums.xisto.com/no_longer_exists/ Notice from saint-michael: second post that you have made copying info from other site. credits reduce. warning issued and post suspenstion 3 days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matto 0 Report post Posted May 17, 2006 Well there are several options as to why this occured. Either your school district is horribly stupid and was unable to express what happened in an intelligent and logical fashion, the court that made the decision was bribed (one way or another, but unlikely...) or is mindlessly un-intelligent, or the teacher in question was actually SMART, and perhaps should not have been fired int he first place, but instead instructed as to what she was doing wrong. Actually, if I was in your place I would be pissed off as well. THere is nothing that I despise more than an incompetant teacher. They ruin school and learning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites