Jump to content
xisto Community
Sign in to follow this  
Nitin Mangi

Help Intel Check You Intuition. Hard time for Intel to make bussiness decisions

Intel Itanium Server Chips  

7 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

SAN FRANCISCO (Business 2.0 Magazine) - Much to Wall Street's dismay, Intel is continuing to invest billions of dollars in Itanium, a chip that most of the industry has written off.

Itanium, Xeon, Woodcrest and Opteron

Itanium introduced after ten years in 2001, with no 64-bit software to run and its crappy performance for 32-bit software is already cost a lot to Intel. AMD took the advantage and with its Opteron chip in 2003 which ran both 32-bit and 64-bit software.

Intels effort to adapt a 32-bit chip to run 64-bit software also (Xeon) is no good either until Dual core processors are released. It appears to be a hard time for Intel if it still has to invest in Itanium.

Woodcrest another Intel's codename for an upcoming 32/64-bit server chip which Intel claims will outperform AMD's offerings.

IBM and Dell already shifted to make servers with AMD's Opteron chips. Sun also abandoned its plans to port its Solaris operating system for Itanium systems.

Is spending billions of dollars in Itanium a wise decision?
Edited by Nitin Mangi (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

millions in actual production and designing, but only billions in stock though. But I think though AMD is pretty good for what its supposed to. both amd and celeron are pretty good for the computer systems that have been coming out in the last few years. But of course I never touch a computer that had Itanium, running though, mostly been running pentium processors on the computer I used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

millions in actual production and designing, but only billions in stock though. But I think though AMD is pretty good for what its supposed to. both amd and celeron are pretty good for the computer systems that have been coming out in the last few years. But of course I never touch a computer that had Itanium, running though, mostly been running pentium processors on the computer I used.


Yaa in personal computing too, Intel is loosing its market share to AMD 64 bit processors for Desktops and Notebooks.

Intel ready to see yet another Inflection Point I Guess :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.