why notepad++ more than bluefish / Quanta ? - vertical selection inexistant under Bluefish / Quanta do it ok - xml reindentation not found under Bluefish (I mean the 'pretty print' function [via plugin under notepad++]) - I'm perhaps wrong on it about Quanta, there is the 'format XML code' feature, but I didn't understood it... - tidy function not found under Bluefish [via plugin under notepad++] - Ok under Quanta - [syntax coloration isn't really good in Bluefish (it doesn't recognize <? as <?php for my instant try) but I've seen this part under dev] - quanta Ok on it - search through all opened files - even quanta (that appears to be a stronger tool than Bluefish) don't do it - search through a directory with a file pattern - even quanta don't do it - different files formats win/unix/mac ; also not found into Bluefish - quanta Ok - file modification detection with alerts - quanta Ok (and better than jedit that don't give any choice on action !!! - muti-view (paned views) - even quanta don't do it I'm far away of the one who wants to kill vi, but under windows at least you can drag your text using the default editor... I'm personally switching between jedit(too slow), gedit(too simple but always ready) and Bluefish / Quanta since few minutes. I hope finding an improved, quick, simply rendered and easy to use text editor as notepad++ for linux. And I'm sorry if I said wrong things about Bluefish and Quanta there, correct me then !
